Automated interpretation of PD-L1 CPS based on multi-AI models integration strategy in gastric cancer

IntroductionProgrammed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) evaluation plays a pivotal role in predicting immunotherapy efficacy for gastric cancer. However, manual CPS assessment suffers from significant inter-observer variability among pathologists, leading to clinical inconsi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ting Han, Meng Zhuo, Ziyu Song, Peilin Chen, Shiting Chen, Wei Zhang, Yuanyuan Zhou, Hong Li, Dadong Zhang, Xiaolin Lin, Zebing Liu, Xiuying Xiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1614099/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionProgrammed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) evaluation plays a pivotal role in predicting immunotherapy efficacy for gastric cancer. However, manual CPS assessment suffers from significant inter-observer variability among pathologists, leading to clinical inconsistencies. To address this limitation, we developed a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that automates PD-L1 CPS quantification for patients with gastric cancer (GC) using whole slide images (WSIs).MethodsWe developed a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that automates PD-L1 CPS quantification for patients with gastric cancer (GC) using whole slide images (WSIs). Our pipeline firstly employs a dual-network architecture for tumor region detection: MobileNet for patch-level classification and U-Net for pixel-level segmentation. Followed by a YOLO-based cell detection model to compute PD-L1 expression on different cells for CPS calculation. A total of 308 GC WSIs were included, including 210 in the internal cohort and 98 in the external cohort. Within the internal cohort, 100 WSIs were utilized for the model development, while the remaining 110 WSIs served as an internal testing set for comparative analysis between AI-derived CPS values and pathologist-derived reference standards.ResultsThe AI-derived CPS demonstrated strong concordance with expert pathologists’ consensus in internal cohort (Cohen’s kappa = 0.782). Furthermore, the AI-based CPS prediction pipeline was evaluated for its performance in the external cohort, and showed robust performance (Cohen’s kappa = 0.737).DiscussionOur system provides a standardized decision-support tool for immunotherapy stratification in GC management, demonstrating potential to improve CPS assessment reproducibility.
ISSN:1664-3224