The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?

It is acknowledged in the literature that Newcastle English is characterised by the use of rising tones as the default tone, Tyneside English being part as such of those varieties displaying a typical Urban Northern British Intonation (UNBI). A previous study on Newcastle English performed on the NE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Herment, Laetitia Leonarduzzi, Caroline Bouzon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires du Midi 2020-12-01
Series:Anglophonia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/3297
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579253283061760
author Sophie Herment
Laetitia Leonarduzzi
Caroline Bouzon
author_facet Sophie Herment
Laetitia Leonarduzzi
Caroline Bouzon
author_sort Sophie Herment
collection DOAJ
description It is acknowledged in the literature that Newcastle English is characterised by the use of rising tones as the default tone, Tyneside English being part as such of those varieties displaying a typical Urban Northern British Intonation (UNBI). A previous study on Newcastle English performed on the NECTE corpus allowed to make out two main types of rises: simple rises or rise-plateaus on the one hand, and up-stepped level tones on the other hand. In this study we hypothesise that the difference between these two types of rises is a phonological rather than a phonetic distinction, meaning that each type of rise has a specific function. We tested this hypothesis by carrying out a pilot study based on a perception experiment. The test fails to show a clear phonological difference between the two types of rises but confirms that Newcastle English belongs to the UNBI group. The results of the test lead us towards another hypothesis, namely that one of our rising contours would actually be a contour known as HRT (High Rising Terminal or Uptalk). HRT has indeed begun to spread through UNBI varieties, and this would be the case in Newcastle, where there would be a coexistence between the two intonations. If this were to be the case, then it could be said that there is a phonological distinction between the two types of rises since it has been demonstrated that HRTs have interactional functions.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d0b9f082f6a4d1b80d6f8418902d3cc
institution Kabale University
issn 1278-3331
2427-0466
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Presses Universitaires du Midi
record_format Article
series Anglophonia
spelling doaj-art-9d0b9f082f6a4d1b80d6f8418902d3cc2025-01-30T12:32:59ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662020-12-012910.4000/anglophonia.3297The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?Sophie HermentLaetitia LeonarduzziCaroline BouzonIt is acknowledged in the literature that Newcastle English is characterised by the use of rising tones as the default tone, Tyneside English being part as such of those varieties displaying a typical Urban Northern British Intonation (UNBI). A previous study on Newcastle English performed on the NECTE corpus allowed to make out two main types of rises: simple rises or rise-plateaus on the one hand, and up-stepped level tones on the other hand. In this study we hypothesise that the difference between these two types of rises is a phonological rather than a phonetic distinction, meaning that each type of rise has a specific function. We tested this hypothesis by carrying out a pilot study based on a perception experiment. The test fails to show a clear phonological difference between the two types of rises but confirms that Newcastle English belongs to the UNBI group. The results of the test lead us towards another hypothesis, namely that one of our rising contours would actually be a contour known as HRT (High Rising Terminal or Uptalk). HRT has indeed begun to spread through UNBI varieties, and this would be the case in Newcastle, where there would be a coexistence between the two intonations. If this were to be the case, then it could be said that there is a phonological distinction between the two types of rises since it has been demonstrated that HRTs have interactional functions.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/3297HRTTyneside Englishrising intonationUNBIvariation.
spellingShingle Sophie Herment
Laetitia Leonarduzzi
Caroline Bouzon
The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?
Anglophonia
HRT
Tyneside English
rising intonation
UNBI
variation.
title The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?
title_full The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?
title_fullStr The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?
title_full_unstemmed The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?
title_short The various rising tones in Newcastle English: a phonological distinction?
title_sort various rising tones in newcastle english a phonological distinction
topic HRT
Tyneside English
rising intonation
UNBI
variation.
url https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/3297
work_keys_str_mv AT sophieherment thevariousrisingtonesinnewcastleenglishaphonologicaldistinction
AT laetitialeonarduzzi thevariousrisingtonesinnewcastleenglishaphonologicaldistinction
AT carolinebouzon thevariousrisingtonesinnewcastleenglishaphonologicaldistinction
AT sophieherment variousrisingtonesinnewcastleenglishaphonologicaldistinction
AT laetitialeonarduzzi variousrisingtonesinnewcastleenglishaphonologicaldistinction
AT carolinebouzon variousrisingtonesinnewcastleenglishaphonologicaldistinction