Competing Risks and Their Impact on Treatment Efficacy Assessment in Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study
ABSTRACT Background and Aims The Kaplan‐Meier (KM) method and competing risk analysis are two statistical approaches for analyzing time‐to‐event data. These methods differ in their treatment of competing events, such as deaths occurring before the event of interest, which can impact the interpretati...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Isabella Gruber, Oliver Koelbl |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Health Science Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70447 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors
by: Anna Krämer, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Efficacy and safety of online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer (GASTO-1075): a single-arm, phase 2 trialResearch in context
by: Shiyang Zheng, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Multicenter analysis of stereotactic radiotherapy of the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases
by: Stephanie E. Combs, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Analysis of linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases: efficacy, safety, and dose tolerances
by: Yuhong Li, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Volumetric and spatial changes in brain metastases during stereotactic radiosurgery: a case for off-line adaptive planning
by: Menekse Turna, et al.
Published: (2025-09-01)