Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent (SSA) and transparent films with absorbent (TFA) dressings are reportedly effective postoperative knee surgery dressings; however, there have been no direct comparative studies on these two innovative dressings over the hip areas. In this s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chirathit Anusitviwat, Varah Yuenyongviwat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05448-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571463373160448
author Chirathit Anusitviwat
Varah Yuenyongviwat
author_facet Chirathit Anusitviwat
Varah Yuenyongviwat
author_sort Chirathit Anusitviwat
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent (SSA) and transparent films with absorbent (TFA) dressings are reportedly effective postoperative knee surgery dressings; however, there have been no direct comparative studies on these two innovative dressings over the hip areas. In this study, we aimed to compare user satisfaction and potential complications between TFA and SSA dressings for the hip area. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital. The hip side to receive the polyurethane film with SSA dressing (Mepilex® Border Post-Op) was randomly allocated. The other side of the hip was covered with TFA (OPSITE Post-Op). Participants were scheduled for follow-ups 7 and 14 days after the initial application. Between-group outcomes were compared using a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables and McNemar’s chi-square test for categorical variables. Results Thirty-two participants (30 − 60 years) without a history of hip surgery were included in the study. The participants were predominantly female, with a mean age of 42.8 years. Pain, difficulties in daily activities, and satisfaction scores were similar between the groups. However, moisture accumulation was significantly higher with the TFA dressing (37.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.01), with more dressing failures (34.5% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.016) and complications (37.9% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.012) at the 14-day follow-up than with the SSA dressing. Conclusions SSA dressings are preferable for hip wound care because of better moisture management, fewer dressing changes required, and fewer complications if applied for > 7 days. Both dressings offered high user satisfaction, minimal pain, and minor difficulties in daily activities.
format Article
id doaj-art-9cc9888288b84f29a847fb1397168559
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-9cc9888288b84f29a847fb13971685592025-02-02T12:34:12ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-02-012011710.1186/s13018-024-05448-7Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trialChirathit Anusitviwat0Varah Yuenyongviwat1Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityAbstract Background Silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent (SSA) and transparent films with absorbent (TFA) dressings are reportedly effective postoperative knee surgery dressings; however, there have been no direct comparative studies on these two innovative dressings over the hip areas. In this study, we aimed to compare user satisfaction and potential complications between TFA and SSA dressings for the hip area. Methods This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital. The hip side to receive the polyurethane film with SSA dressing (Mepilex® Border Post-Op) was randomly allocated. The other side of the hip was covered with TFA (OPSITE Post-Op). Participants were scheduled for follow-ups 7 and 14 days after the initial application. Between-group outcomes were compared using a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables and McNemar’s chi-square test for categorical variables. Results Thirty-two participants (30 − 60 years) without a history of hip surgery were included in the study. The participants were predominantly female, with a mean age of 42.8 years. Pain, difficulties in daily activities, and satisfaction scores were similar between the groups. However, moisture accumulation was significantly higher with the TFA dressing (37.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.01), with more dressing failures (34.5% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.016) and complications (37.9% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.012) at the 14-day follow-up than with the SSA dressing. Conclusions SSA dressings are preferable for hip wound care because of better moisture management, fewer dressing changes required, and fewer complications if applied for > 7 days. Both dressings offered high user satisfaction, minimal pain, and minor difficulties in daily activities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05448-7MepilexOPSITEDressingHip
spellingShingle Chirathit Anusitviwat
Varah Yuenyongviwat
Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Mepilex
OPSITE
Dressing
Hip
title Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing silicone-coated self-adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing silicone coated self adhesive absorbent polyurethane films with transparent absorbent films for bilateral hip dressing a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Mepilex
OPSITE
Dressing
Hip
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05448-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chirathitanusitviwat comparingsiliconecoatedselfadhesiveabsorbentpolyurethanefilmswithtransparentabsorbentfilmsforbilateralhipdressingaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT varahyuenyongviwat comparingsiliconecoatedselfadhesiveabsorbentpolyurethanefilmswithtransparentabsorbentfilmsforbilateralhipdressingaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial