Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trial

Abstract Background Massive degenerative rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) represent a persistent challenge in shoulder surgery. While arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) remains a widely accepted treatment with good functional outcomes, it is associated with a risk of retear and progression to cuff te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Lädermann, Anthony Pernoud, Blaise Cochard, Hugo Bothorel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08990-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234466310979584
author Alexandre Lädermann
Anthony Pernoud
Blaise Cochard
Hugo Bothorel
author_facet Alexandre Lädermann
Anthony Pernoud
Blaise Cochard
Hugo Bothorel
author_sort Alexandre Lädermann
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Massive degenerative rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) represent a persistent challenge in shoulder surgery. While arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) remains a widely accepted treatment with good functional outcomes, it is associated with a risk of retear and progression to cuff tear arthropathy. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as a viable alternative, particularly in cases where the reparability of the cuff is uncertain, offering pain relief and functional improvement. However, the optimal treatment approach for repairable MRCT in patients aged 60 to 80 years remains debated. This trial aims to assess whether RSA provides non-inferior outcomes to ARCR in patients with degenerative MRCTs, with a particular focus on function, pain, and quality of life. Methods This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 145 patients with symptomatic, repairable MRCT will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either ARCR or RSA. The primary outcome is the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at 24 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include ASES at 6 weeks and 6 months; Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); Constant score; range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, and internal/external rotation; repair integrity (ultrasound for ARCR, radiographs for RSA); and complication rates. PROMs will be assessed at baseline, 1.5, 6, and 24 months. All adverse events and complications will be systematically recorded. Discussion This trial will provide robust comparative data to assess whether RSA is non-inferior to ARCR at two years postoperatively in terms of shoulder function and patient-reported outcomes in patients with repairable MRCT. The results aim to support evidence-based decision-making in clinical practice. Trial registration The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee Board (CCER 2023–00111) in March 2023 and by ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05807854).
format Article
id doaj-art-9cc79463d196471a8df4485cfd6191f6
institution Kabale University
issn 1745-6215
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj-art-9cc79463d196471a8df4485cfd6191f62025-08-20T04:03:07ZengBMCTrials1745-62152025-08-0126111210.1186/s13063-025-08990-9Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trialAlexandre Lädermann0Anthony Pernoud1Blaise Cochard2Hugo Bothorel3Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour HospitalResearch Department, La Tour HospitalDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University HospitalsResearch Department, La Tour HospitalAbstract Background Massive degenerative rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) represent a persistent challenge in shoulder surgery. While arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) remains a widely accepted treatment with good functional outcomes, it is associated with a risk of retear and progression to cuff tear arthropathy. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as a viable alternative, particularly in cases where the reparability of the cuff is uncertain, offering pain relief and functional improvement. However, the optimal treatment approach for repairable MRCT in patients aged 60 to 80 years remains debated. This trial aims to assess whether RSA provides non-inferior outcomes to ARCR in patients with degenerative MRCTs, with a particular focus on function, pain, and quality of life. Methods This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 145 patients with symptomatic, repairable MRCT will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either ARCR or RSA. The primary outcome is the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at 24 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include ASES at 6 weeks and 6 months; Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); Constant score; range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, and internal/external rotation; repair integrity (ultrasound for ARCR, radiographs for RSA); and complication rates. PROMs will be assessed at baseline, 1.5, 6, and 24 months. All adverse events and complications will be systematically recorded. Discussion This trial will provide robust comparative data to assess whether RSA is non-inferior to ARCR at two years postoperatively in terms of shoulder function and patient-reported outcomes in patients with repairable MRCT. The results aim to support evidence-based decision-making in clinical practice. Trial registration The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee Board (CCER 2023–00111) in March 2023 and by ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05807854).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08990-9Massive rotator cuff tearsReverse shoulder arthroplastyArthroscopic repairPROMsROMComplications
spellingShingle Alexandre Lädermann
Anthony Pernoud
Blaise Cochard
Hugo Bothorel
Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trial
Trials
Massive rotator cuff tears
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Arthroscopic repair
PROMs
ROM
Complications
title Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trial
title_full Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trial
title_fullStr Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trial
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trial
title_short Treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears: a study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority comparative surgical trial
title_sort treatment of degenerative massive rotator cuff tears a study protocol for a randomized non inferiority comparative surgical trial
topic Massive rotator cuff tears
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Arthroscopic repair
PROMs
ROM
Complications
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08990-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandreladermann treatmentofdegenerativemassiverotatorcufftearsastudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritycomparativesurgicaltrial
AT anthonypernoud treatmentofdegenerativemassiverotatorcufftearsastudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritycomparativesurgicaltrial
AT blaisecochard treatmentofdegenerativemassiverotatorcufftearsastudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritycomparativesurgicaltrial
AT hugobothorel treatmentofdegenerativemassiverotatorcufftearsastudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritycomparativesurgicaltrial