A simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalities

Abstract Objective To explore a simple quantitative method for detecting fetal abnormal Sylvian fissure (SF) on ultrasonographic screening and to investigate its value in fetuses with SF abnormalities. Methods As the control group, 128 patients were examined prospectively by 2D ultrasound from 22 to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cuixia Guo, Lijuan Sun, Yan Liu, Tiejuan Zhang, Li Wang, Yuting Liang, Jingjing Wang, Qingqing Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-06-01
Series:European Journal of Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02708-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850113196426264576
author Cuixia Guo
Lijuan Sun
Yan Liu
Tiejuan Zhang
Li Wang
Yuting Liang
Jingjing Wang
Qingqing Wu
author_facet Cuixia Guo
Lijuan Sun
Yan Liu
Tiejuan Zhang
Li Wang
Yuting Liang
Jingjing Wang
Qingqing Wu
author_sort Cuixia Guo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To explore a simple quantitative method for detecting fetal abnormal Sylvian fissure (SF) on ultrasonographic screening and to investigate its value in fetuses with SF abnormalities. Methods As the control group, 128 patients were examined prospectively by 2D ultrasound from 22 to 31 gestational weeks. We measured the depth of the SF (SFD) and width of the SF (SFW) and defined a new parameter, namely, the SF ratio (SFR), as the ratio of the SFW to the SFD. Reference equations were constructed for the SF parameters and gestational age (GA). Thirty-eight fetuses with SF abnormalities were included in the study group. Results In total, 310 ultrasound examinations were performed on 128 patients in the control group. The plateau-like insula was always present, and the SFD, SFW, and SFR increased with increasing gestational weeks between 22 and 31 gestational weeks. SFD (mm) = −1.48GA2−0.02GA+16.81 (R 2 = 0.803). SFW (mm) = 5.62GA2−0.08GA–79.34 (R 2 = 0.880). SFR = 0.53GA2−0.01GA-6.55 (R 2 = 0.619). The SFR was >0.7 from 22 to 24 gestational weeks and >1 after 25 gestational weeks in the control group. In the study group, the SFD, SFW, and SFR values were below the 5th percentile of the respective normal ranges in 26/38 (68.4%), 38/38 (100%), and 38/38 (100%) patients with abnormal SF. There were significant differences in three parameters between the two groups (P<0.05). With respect to the final diagnosis, 30/38 (78.9%) fetuses had malformations of cortical development (MCD), and 8/38 (21.1%) fetuses had multiple CNS malformations. Conclusions The SFR was >0.7 from 22-24 gestational weeks, and a value >1 after 25 weeks may serve as a simple parameter for detecting abnormal SF. An abnormal SF tends to be an indicator of CNS anomalies, especially MCD.
format Article
id doaj-art-9cbde69572284ecbba638ba86f692d8d
institution OA Journals
issn 2047-783X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series European Journal of Medical Research
spelling doaj-art-9cbde69572284ecbba638ba86f692d8d2025-08-20T02:37:13ZengBMCEuropean Journal of Medical Research2047-783X2025-06-0130111110.1186/s40001-025-02708-yA simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalitiesCuixia Guo0Lijuan Sun1Yan Liu2Tiejuan Zhang3Li Wang4Yuting Liang5Jingjing Wang6Qingqing Wu7Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalClinical Trial Institution Office, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalAbstract Objective To explore a simple quantitative method for detecting fetal abnormal Sylvian fissure (SF) on ultrasonographic screening and to investigate its value in fetuses with SF abnormalities. Methods As the control group, 128 patients were examined prospectively by 2D ultrasound from 22 to 31 gestational weeks. We measured the depth of the SF (SFD) and width of the SF (SFW) and defined a new parameter, namely, the SF ratio (SFR), as the ratio of the SFW to the SFD. Reference equations were constructed for the SF parameters and gestational age (GA). Thirty-eight fetuses with SF abnormalities were included in the study group. Results In total, 310 ultrasound examinations were performed on 128 patients in the control group. The plateau-like insula was always present, and the SFD, SFW, and SFR increased with increasing gestational weeks between 22 and 31 gestational weeks. SFD (mm) = −1.48GA2−0.02GA+16.81 (R 2 = 0.803). SFW (mm) = 5.62GA2−0.08GA–79.34 (R 2 = 0.880). SFR = 0.53GA2−0.01GA-6.55 (R 2 = 0.619). The SFR was >0.7 from 22 to 24 gestational weeks and >1 after 25 gestational weeks in the control group. In the study group, the SFD, SFW, and SFR values were below the 5th percentile of the respective normal ranges in 26/38 (68.4%), 38/38 (100%), and 38/38 (100%) patients with abnormal SF. There were significant differences in three parameters between the two groups (P<0.05). With respect to the final diagnosis, 30/38 (78.9%) fetuses had malformations of cortical development (MCD), and 8/38 (21.1%) fetuses had multiple CNS malformations. Conclusions The SFR was >0.7 from 22-24 gestational weeks, and a value >1 after 25 weeks may serve as a simple parameter for detecting abnormal SF. An abnormal SF tends to be an indicator of CNS anomalies, especially MCD.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02708-ySylvian fissureFetusUltrasonographyMalformation of cortical developmentGenetic tests
spellingShingle Cuixia Guo
Lijuan Sun
Yan Liu
Tiejuan Zhang
Li Wang
Yuting Liang
Jingjing Wang
Qingqing Wu
A simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalities
European Journal of Medical Research
Sylvian fissure
Fetus
Ultrasonography
Malformation of cortical development
Genetic tests
title A simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalities
title_full A simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalities
title_fullStr A simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalities
title_full_unstemmed A simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalities
title_short A simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal Sylvian fissure abnormalities
title_sort simple and quantitative ultrasonographic screening method for fetal sylvian fissure abnormalities
topic Sylvian fissure
Fetus
Ultrasonography
Malformation of cortical development
Genetic tests
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02708-y
work_keys_str_mv AT cuixiaguo asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT lijuansun asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT yanliu asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT tiejuanzhang asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT liwang asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT yutingliang asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT jingjingwang asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT qingqingwu asimpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT cuixiaguo simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT lijuansun simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT yanliu simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT tiejuanzhang simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT liwang simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT yutingliang simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT jingjingwang simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities
AT qingqingwu simpleandquantitativeultrasonographicscreeningmethodforfetalsylvianfissureabnormalities