Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals

Abstract Social exclusion is a negative experience in social interaction which can be modulated by the perceived eye gaze. In our Cyberball study, we asked how gaze direction – direct versus averted – affects the processing of social exclusion by using electroencephalogram (EEG) methods. Participant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Fang Yang, Xu Fang, Michael Niedeggen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97840-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850181907674824704
author Yu-Fang Yang
Xu Fang
Michael Niedeggen
author_facet Yu-Fang Yang
Xu Fang
Michael Niedeggen
author_sort Yu-Fang Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Social exclusion is a negative experience in social interaction which can be modulated by the perceived eye gaze. In our Cyberball study, we asked how gaze direction – direct versus averted – affects the processing of social exclusion by using electroencephalogram (EEG) methods. Participants encountered neutral gazes in the inclusion phase (Block1) and then either direct or averted gazes during the exclusion phase (Block2). We measured self-reports on Need-Threat Questionnaires (belonging, control, meaningful existence, self-esteem) and negative mood, along with event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically the P3 component (P300) - an indicator of expectation violation. Findings demonstrated that the P3 amplitude showed differential changes between gaze conditions during the transition from inclusion to exclusion, with direct gaze eliciting stronger neural responses. This difference signals that direct gaze enhances the expected participation, thus sensitizing participants for exclusionary signals. Simultaneously, self-reports indicated that the transition evoked weaker negative emotions in the direct gaze group and stronger negative emotions in the averted gaze group, signalling that direct gaze also serves as an affiliative signal. These results illuminate how gaze directions shape cognitive and emotional reactions to social exclusion. However, further research is necessary to unravel these effects amidst other non-verbal cues and fully comprehend their impact on neural and behavioural responses to social exclusion.
format Article
id doaj-art-9cab1b8a65df426eb02de54a4624800b
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-9cab1b8a65df426eb02de54a4624800b2025-08-20T02:17:47ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-04-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-97840-4Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signalsYu-Fang Yang0Xu Fang1Michael Niedeggen2Division of Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität BerlinDivision of Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität BerlinDivision of Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität BerlinAbstract Social exclusion is a negative experience in social interaction which can be modulated by the perceived eye gaze. In our Cyberball study, we asked how gaze direction – direct versus averted – affects the processing of social exclusion by using electroencephalogram (EEG) methods. Participants encountered neutral gazes in the inclusion phase (Block1) and then either direct or averted gazes during the exclusion phase (Block2). We measured self-reports on Need-Threat Questionnaires (belonging, control, meaningful existence, self-esteem) and negative mood, along with event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically the P3 component (P300) - an indicator of expectation violation. Findings demonstrated that the P3 amplitude showed differential changes between gaze conditions during the transition from inclusion to exclusion, with direct gaze eliciting stronger neural responses. This difference signals that direct gaze enhances the expected participation, thus sensitizing participants for exclusionary signals. Simultaneously, self-reports indicated that the transition evoked weaker negative emotions in the direct gaze group and stronger negative emotions in the averted gaze group, signalling that direct gaze also serves as an affiliative signal. These results illuminate how gaze directions shape cognitive and emotional reactions to social exclusion. However, further research is necessary to unravel these effects amidst other non-verbal cues and fully comprehend their impact on neural and behavioural responses to social exclusion.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97840-4Social exclusionEye directionP300Event-related potentialsCyberball paradigm
spellingShingle Yu-Fang Yang
Xu Fang
Michael Niedeggen
Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals
Scientific Reports
Social exclusion
Eye direction
P300
Event-related potentials
Cyberball paradigm
title Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals
title_full Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals
title_fullStr Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals
title_full_unstemmed Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals
title_short Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals
title_sort direct and averted gaze modulate the event related brain responses to social exclusion signals
topic Social exclusion
Eye direction
P300
Event-related potentials
Cyberball paradigm
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97840-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yufangyang directandavertedgazemodulatetheeventrelatedbrainresponsestosocialexclusionsignals
AT xufang directandavertedgazemodulatetheeventrelatedbrainresponsestosocialexclusionsignals
AT michaelniedeggen directandavertedgazemodulatetheeventrelatedbrainresponsestosocialexclusionsignals