Theosis in Patristic Thought
In the current renewal of interest in the deification theme, the consensual and homogeneous character of this concept among early Christian writers is generally assumed. This article concisely examines the intricate complexity of the emergence and development of theosis in patristic theology, acknow...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Eastern European Instute of Theology
2008-12-01
|
| Series: | Богословські роздуми: Східноєвропейський журнал богословʼя |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/87783 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849330002301026304 |
|---|---|
| author | Vladimir KHARLAMOV |
| author_facet | Vladimir KHARLAMOV |
| author_sort | Vladimir KHARLAMOV |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the current renewal of interest in the deification theme, the consensual and homogeneous character of this concept among early Christian writers is generally assumed. This article concisely examines the intricate complexity of the emergence and development of theosis in patristic theology, acknowledging the initially marginal, rhetorical, multi-dimensional, and often contextualized role of this concept prior to its theological consolidation in Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Maximus the Confessor in the sixth and seventh centuries. Important to Palamite and Neo-Palamite Eastern Orthodox theology, the distinction between the divine essence and energy is not necessarily a representative characteristic of the early church fathers. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9c7e7a69d3e14d89ada2fd2340dbf683 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2789-1569 2789-1577 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2008-12-01 |
| publisher | Eastern European Instute of Theology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Богословські роздуми: Східноєвропейський журнал богословʼя |
| spelling | doaj-art-9c7e7a69d3e14d89ada2fd2340dbf6832025-08-20T03:47:06ZengEastern European Instute of TheologyБогословські роздуми: Східноєвропейський журнал богословʼя2789-15692789-15772008-12-019Theosis in Patristic ThoughtVladimir KHARLAMOVIn the current renewal of interest in the deification theme, the consensual and homogeneous character of this concept among early Christian writers is generally assumed. This article concisely examines the intricate complexity of the emergence and development of theosis in patristic theology, acknowledging the initially marginal, rhetorical, multi-dimensional, and often contextualized role of this concept prior to its theological consolidation in Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Maximus the Confessor in the sixth and seventh centuries. Important to Palamite and Neo-Palamite Eastern Orthodox theology, the distinction between the divine essence and energy is not necessarily a representative characteristic of the early church fathers.http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/87783TheosisPseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Maximus the Confessoessence and energy |
| spellingShingle | Vladimir KHARLAMOV Theosis in Patristic Thought Богословські роздуми: Східноєвропейський журнал богословʼя Theosis Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Maximus the Confesso essence and energy |
| title | Theosis in Patristic Thought |
| title_full | Theosis in Patristic Thought |
| title_fullStr | Theosis in Patristic Thought |
| title_full_unstemmed | Theosis in Patristic Thought |
| title_short | Theosis in Patristic Thought |
| title_sort | theosis in patristic thought |
| topic | Theosis Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Maximus the Confesso essence and energy |
| url | http://reflections.eeit-edu.info/article/view/87783 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vladimirkharlamov theosisinpatristicthought |