Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in Brazil

Abstract Streamflow exhibits persistent decadal variability; however, it is unclear if the magnitude and spatial extent of these variabilities are symmetric for droughts and floods. Here, we examine drought‐rich and flood‐rich periods in 319 streamflow gauges in Brazil from 1940 to 2020. Drought‐ an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vinícius B. P. Chagas, Pedro L. B. Chaffe, Günter Blöschl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-10-01
Series:Water Resources Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035851
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849422700696567808
author Vinícius B. P. Chagas
Pedro L. B. Chaffe
Günter Blöschl
author_facet Vinícius B. P. Chagas
Pedro L. B. Chaffe
Günter Blöschl
author_sort Vinícius B. P. Chagas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Streamflow exhibits persistent decadal variability; however, it is unclear if the magnitude and spatial extent of these variabilities are symmetric for droughts and floods. Here, we examine drought‐rich and flood‐rich periods in 319 streamflow gauges in Brazil from 1940 to 2020. Drought‐ and flood‐rich periods are detected by computing annual streamflow minima and maxima time series and using scan statistics to verify if events exceeding a threshold follow a Bernoulli process. We contrast streamflow time clustering with rainfall, evaporation, water abstraction, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). We detected a higher spatial frequency of drought‐ than flood‐rich periods. For 5‐year return period thresholds, drought‐rich periods are observed in 81% of the basins, 16.7 times the false positive rate (4.8%) and 4.7 times flood‐rich periods (17%). This asymmetry is linked with sharp increases in water abstractions since the 1990s and a higher prevalence of rainfall‐poor periods (41% of gauges) compared to rainfall‐rich (22% of gauges), which we interpret as being further amplified into drought‐rich periods due to an interannual persistence of water storage deficits. Brazil experienced a dry period until the 1960s, extensive flooding in the 1980s, and record low flows from the 2000s onward. Drought and flood‐rich periods are well aligned with rainfall clustering, water abstractions, the AMO and PDO. Droughts‐rich periods are more frequent in shorter time scales (several years to one decade) and flood‐rich periods in longer time scales (a few decades). Our findings highlight the nonlinearity and asymmetry of drought and flood change at decadal scales.
format Article
id doaj-art-9c75966329474aed854fc87a55075c8d
institution Kabale University
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Water Resources Research
spelling doaj-art-9c75966329474aed854fc87a55075c8d2025-08-20T03:30:57ZengWileyWater Resources Research0043-13971944-79732024-10-016010n/an/a10.1029/2023WR035851Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in BrazilVinícius B. P. Chagas0Pedro L. B. Chaffe1Günter Blöschl2Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianopolis BrazilDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianopolis BrazilInstitute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Technische Universität Wien Vienna AustriaAbstract Streamflow exhibits persistent decadal variability; however, it is unclear if the magnitude and spatial extent of these variabilities are symmetric for droughts and floods. Here, we examine drought‐rich and flood‐rich periods in 319 streamflow gauges in Brazil from 1940 to 2020. Drought‐ and flood‐rich periods are detected by computing annual streamflow minima and maxima time series and using scan statistics to verify if events exceeding a threshold follow a Bernoulli process. We contrast streamflow time clustering with rainfall, evaporation, water abstraction, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). We detected a higher spatial frequency of drought‐ than flood‐rich periods. For 5‐year return period thresholds, drought‐rich periods are observed in 81% of the basins, 16.7 times the false positive rate (4.8%) and 4.7 times flood‐rich periods (17%). This asymmetry is linked with sharp increases in water abstractions since the 1990s and a higher prevalence of rainfall‐poor periods (41% of gauges) compared to rainfall‐rich (22% of gauges), which we interpret as being further amplified into drought‐rich periods due to an interannual persistence of water storage deficits. Brazil experienced a dry period until the 1960s, extensive flooding in the 1980s, and record low flows from the 2000s onward. Drought and flood‐rich periods are well aligned with rainfall clustering, water abstractions, the AMO and PDO. Droughts‐rich periods are more frequent in shorter time scales (several years to one decade) and flood‐rich periods in longer time scales (a few decades). Our findings highlight the nonlinearity and asymmetry of drought and flood change at decadal scales.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035851hazardsSouth Americaextremesdroughtsfloodstime clustering
spellingShingle Vinícius B. P. Chagas
Pedro L. B. Chaffe
Günter Blöschl
Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in Brazil
Water Resources Research
hazards
South America
extremes
droughts
floods
time clustering
title Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in Brazil
title_full Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in Brazil
title_fullStr Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in Brazil
title_short Drought‐Rich Periods Are More Likely Than Flood‐Rich Periods in Brazil
title_sort drought rich periods are more likely than flood rich periods in brazil
topic hazards
South America
extremes
droughts
floods
time clustering
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035851
work_keys_str_mv AT viniciusbpchagas droughtrichperiodsaremorelikelythanfloodrichperiodsinbrazil
AT pedrolbchaffe droughtrichperiodsaremorelikelythanfloodrichperiodsinbrazil
AT gunterbloschl droughtrichperiodsaremorelikelythanfloodrichperiodsinbrazil