Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations

One reason to end a mandate agreement involves the unilateral termination procedure regulated under Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations (TCO). According to this provision, the mandatee and mandator are entitled to unilaterally terminate a mandate agreement without need to propound upon a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Tolga Özer
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Istanbul University Press 2023-05-01
Series:Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/35FBC398CA18410D85A946D99A655BBE
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849315615664242688
author M. Tolga Özer
author_facet M. Tolga Özer
author_sort M. Tolga Özer
collection DOAJ
description One reason to end a mandate agreement involves the unilateral termination procedure regulated under Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations (TCO). According to this provision, the mandatee and mandator are entitled to unilaterally terminate a mandate agreement without need to propound upon a rightful reason or grant a notice period. The purpose of this provision is to allow the parties to easily terminate a contractual relationship in the event of a deterioration between the parties in the mutual trust that lies at the foundation of the mandate agreement. However, terminating an agreement without any reason or notice period may have detrimental effects on the other party in certain cases. In consideration of this possibility, legislators have regulated that the party who terminates a mandate agreement at an inopportune juncture shall compensate the other party for the damages arising from such a termination (qqv. TCO Art. 512 /p. 2). This study aims to review the right to unilaterally terminate a mandate agreement regulated under Article 512 of the TCO. The study will review within this scope the legal nature of this right, the procedures for its use, and its field of application in the first stage. Following this stage, the study will peruse information on compensation liability due to the termination of a mandate agreement at an inopportune juncture and review the legal grounds and scope regarding this compensation. The study will conclude by questioning whether Article 512 of the TCO is a mandatory provision or not.
format Article
id doaj-art-9c29974e4dfc41c5b1ba6420f65bc142
institution Kabale University
issn 0578-9745
2687-4113
language deu
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul
spelling doaj-art-9c29974e4dfc41c5b1ba6420f65bc1422025-08-20T03:52:06ZdeuIstanbul University PressAnnales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul0578-97452687-41132023-05-0172315210.26650/annales.2023.72.0003123456Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of ObligationsM. Tolga Özer0Türk-Alman Üniversitesi, Istanbul, TurkiyeOne reason to end a mandate agreement involves the unilateral termination procedure regulated under Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations (TCO). According to this provision, the mandatee and mandator are entitled to unilaterally terminate a mandate agreement without need to propound upon a rightful reason or grant a notice period. The purpose of this provision is to allow the parties to easily terminate a contractual relationship in the event of a deterioration between the parties in the mutual trust that lies at the foundation of the mandate agreement. However, terminating an agreement without any reason or notice period may have detrimental effects on the other party in certain cases. In consideration of this possibility, legislators have regulated that the party who terminates a mandate agreement at an inopportune juncture shall compensate the other party for the damages arising from such a termination (qqv. TCO Art. 512 /p. 2). This study aims to review the right to unilaterally terminate a mandate agreement regulated under Article 512 of the TCO. The study will review within this scope the legal nature of this right, the procedures for its use, and its field of application in the first stage. Following this stage, the study will peruse information on compensation liability due to the termination of a mandate agreement at an inopportune juncture and review the legal grounds and scope regarding this compensation. The study will conclude by questioning whether Article 512 of the TCO is a mandatory provision or not.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/35FBC398CA18410D85A946D99A655BBEmandatemandate agreementterminationrescissionmandateemandatorcompensation
spellingShingle M. Tolga Özer
Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations
Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul
mandate
mandate agreement
termination
rescission
mandatee
mandator
compensation
title Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations
title_full Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations
title_fullStr Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations
title_full_unstemmed Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations
title_short Unilaterally Termination of the Mandate Agreement as Per Article 512 of the Turkish Code of Obligations
title_sort unilaterally termination of the mandate agreement as per article 512 of the turkish code of obligations
topic mandate
mandate agreement
termination
rescission
mandatee
mandator
compensation
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/35FBC398CA18410D85A946D99A655BBE
work_keys_str_mv AT mtolgaozer unilaterallyterminationofthemandateagreementasperarticle512oftheturkishcodeofobligations