Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No Alternative

Having proclaimed its neutral status in 1834, Sweden has long followed a special trajectory that allowed it to distance itself from participation in armed conflicts and military-political blocs. In the context of preparations to join the EU, the Swedish political discourse shifted from neutrality t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ігор Гурак, Ігор Цепенда, Сергій Дерев'янко
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University 2023-06-01
Series:Історико-політичні проблеми сучасного світу
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mhpi.chnu.edu.ua/mhpi/article/view/60
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850195865556221952
author Ігор Гурак
Ігор Цепенда
Сергій Дерев'янко
author_facet Ігор Гурак
Ігор Цепенда
Сергій Дерев'янко
author_sort Ігор Гурак
collection DOAJ
description Having proclaimed its neutral status in 1834, Sweden has long followed a special trajectory that allowed it to distance itself from participation in armed conflicts and military-political blocs. In the context of preparations to join the EU, the Swedish political discourse shifted from neutrality to the principles of ‘non-alignment’ and ‘military non-alignment’. At the beginning of the 21st century, neutrality virtually disappeared from the official documents of the kingdom. At the same time, Sweden was undergoing demilitarization, which was not hindered even by the war in Georgia in 2008. Only with the beginning of Russian aggression against Ukraine, the Swedes resorted to increasing military spending, military personnel, shifted focus from the foreign activity of the country’s armed forces to territorial defense, and also intensifying cooperation with NATO. A qualitative transformation of the official Stockholm approaches to the implementation of state policy in the field of security and defense emerged after the start of Russia’s large-scale war against Ukraine. In May 2022, contrary to the long-standing tradition of neutrality / non-alignment, official Stockholm applied for the country’s accession to NATO.
format Article
id doaj-art-9bf764689ee5437f8b04d8c6eae7904c
institution OA Journals
issn 2519-4518
2617-2372
language deu
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
record_format Article
series Історико-політичні проблеми сучасного світу
spelling doaj-art-9bf764689ee5437f8b04d8c6eae7904c2025-08-20T02:13:39ZdeuYuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National UniversityІсторико-політичні проблеми сучасного світу2519-45182617-23722023-06-014710.31861/mhpi2023.47.73-8560Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No AlternativeІгор Гурак0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-4024Ігор Цепенда1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2926-8935Сергій Дерев'янко2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3848-7072Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National UniversityVasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National UniversityVasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University Having proclaimed its neutral status in 1834, Sweden has long followed a special trajectory that allowed it to distance itself from participation in armed conflicts and military-political blocs. In the context of preparations to join the EU, the Swedish political discourse shifted from neutrality to the principles of ‘non-alignment’ and ‘military non-alignment’. At the beginning of the 21st century, neutrality virtually disappeared from the official documents of the kingdom. At the same time, Sweden was undergoing demilitarization, which was not hindered even by the war in Georgia in 2008. Only with the beginning of Russian aggression against Ukraine, the Swedes resorted to increasing military spending, military personnel, shifted focus from the foreign activity of the country’s armed forces to territorial defense, and also intensifying cooperation with NATO. A qualitative transformation of the official Stockholm approaches to the implementation of state policy in the field of security and defense emerged after the start of Russia’s large-scale war against Ukraine. In May 2022, contrary to the long-standing tradition of neutrality / non-alignment, official Stockholm applied for the country’s accession to NATO. https://mhpi.chnu.edu.ua/mhpi/article/view/60Swedenneutralitynon-alignmentRussiaUkraineNATO
spellingShingle Ігор Гурак
Ігор Цепенда
Сергій Дерев'янко
Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No Alternative
Історико-політичні проблеми сучасного світу
Sweden
neutrality
non-alignment
Russia
Ukraine
NATO
title Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No Alternative
title_full Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No Alternative
title_fullStr Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No Alternative
title_full_unstemmed Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No Alternative
title_short Sweden’s Rejection of Neutral / Non-Aligned Status Or Why Ukraine’s Membership in NATO Should Have No Alternative
title_sort sweden s rejection of neutral non aligned status or why ukraine s membership in nato should have no alternative
topic Sweden
neutrality
non-alignment
Russia
Ukraine
NATO
url https://mhpi.chnu.edu.ua/mhpi/article/view/60
work_keys_str_mv AT ígorgurak swedensrejectionofneutralnonalignedstatusorwhyukrainesmembershipinnatoshouldhavenoalternative
AT ígorcependa swedensrejectionofneutralnonalignedstatusorwhyukrainesmembershipinnatoshouldhavenoalternative
AT sergíjderevânko swedensrejectionofneutralnonalignedstatusorwhyukrainesmembershipinnatoshouldhavenoalternative