Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization
In prosthetics, 3D scanning technology plays a crucial role in gathering data for designing prosthetic devices. New tools for capturing the external shape of human body parts are rapidly emerging. This study conducted a comparative analysis to assess the accuracy and precision of two handheld 3D sc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Mustansiriyah University/College of Engineering
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jeasd.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/jeasd/article/view/2818 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849424823322673152 |
|---|---|
| author | Sarah Duraid AlQaissi Ahmed A.A. AlDuroobi Abdulkader Ali. A. Kadaw |
| author_facet | Sarah Duraid AlQaissi Ahmed A.A. AlDuroobi Abdulkader Ali. A. Kadaw |
| author_sort | Sarah Duraid AlQaissi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In prosthetics, 3D scanning technology plays a crucial role in gathering data for designing prosthetic devices. New tools for capturing the external shape of human body parts are rapidly emerging. This study conducted a comparative analysis to assess the accuracy and precision of two handheld 3D scanners, including the Peel 3 3D scanner and a smartphone application, in scanning the residual limb of a transtibial participant. The residual limb was manually measured, and six scans were taken with each scanning system, compared to the reference computed tomography (CT) model. A repetition test was performed to determine the mean value and standard deviation of the scanned models in VXelements software for comparison purposes. The results showed a standard deviation difference between the Peel 3 and CT scans ranging from ± 0.828 to 0.907mm, and from ± 0.823 to ± 0.877mm for the smartphone scans. The repetition test indicated standard deviations ranging from ± 0.531 to 0.599 mm for the Peel 3 and ± 0.458 to 0.690 mm for the smartphone. This analysis evaluated the accuracy of the 3D scanners and identified the essential specifications for their effective use in prosthetics.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9bf2a68577da4d6cb7b564d9846c5aeb |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2520-0917 2520-0925 |
| language | Arabic |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Mustansiriyah University/College of Engineering |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development |
| spelling | doaj-art-9bf2a68577da4d6cb7b564d9846c5aeb2025-08-20T03:29:58ZaraMustansiriyah University/College of EngineeringJournal of Engineering and Sustainable Development2520-09172520-09252025-07-0129410.31272/jeasd.2818Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape CharacterizationSarah Duraid AlQaissi0https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7125-9239Ahmed A.A. AlDuroobi1https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0268-7920Abdulkader Ali. A. Kadaw2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-185XDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, 10070, IraqDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, 10070, IraqTU Bergakademie Freiberg, Institute for Machine Elements, Engineering Design and Manufacturing, 09599, Freiberg, Germany In prosthetics, 3D scanning technology plays a crucial role in gathering data for designing prosthetic devices. New tools for capturing the external shape of human body parts are rapidly emerging. This study conducted a comparative analysis to assess the accuracy and precision of two handheld 3D scanners, including the Peel 3 3D scanner and a smartphone application, in scanning the residual limb of a transtibial participant. The residual limb was manually measured, and six scans were taken with each scanning system, compared to the reference computed tomography (CT) model. A repetition test was performed to determine the mean value and standard deviation of the scanned models in VXelements software for comparison purposes. The results showed a standard deviation difference between the Peel 3 and CT scans ranging from ± 0.828 to 0.907mm, and from ± 0.823 to ± 0.877mm for the smartphone scans. The repetition test indicated standard deviations ranging from ± 0.531 to 0.599 mm for the Peel 3 and ± 0.458 to 0.690 mm for the smartphone. This analysis evaluated the accuracy of the 3D scanners and identified the essential specifications for their effective use in prosthetics. https://jeasd.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/jeasd/article/view/2818AccuracyPeel 3 ScannerPrecisionSmartphone 3D ScanningTranstibial Amputation |
| spellingShingle | Sarah Duraid AlQaissi Ahmed A.A. AlDuroobi Abdulkader Ali. A. Kadaw Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Accuracy Peel 3 Scanner Precision Smartphone 3D Scanning Transtibial Amputation |
| title | Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization |
| title_full | Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization |
| title_fullStr | Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization |
| title_short | Scanning Technologies Adoption for Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization |
| title_sort | scanning technologies adoption for transtibial residual limb shape characterization |
| topic | Accuracy Peel 3 Scanner Precision Smartphone 3D Scanning Transtibial Amputation |
| url | https://jeasd.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/jeasd/article/view/2818 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sarahduraidalqaissi scanningtechnologiesadoptionfortranstibialresiduallimbshapecharacterization AT ahmedaaalduroobi scanningtechnologiesadoptionfortranstibialresiduallimbshapecharacterization AT abdulkaderaliakadaw scanningtechnologiesadoptionfortranstibialresiduallimbshapecharacterization |