Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design
The ultimate goal of the public procurement remedies system is to effectively enforce procurement rules and ensure that tenderers can appeal against contract awards and other decisions as efficiently and quickly as possible. In Finland, multiple measures have been taken to make the public procuremen...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | TalTech Journal of European Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0009 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850216803818536960 |
|---|---|
| author | Kaave Piia Storsjö Isabell Heikkinen Pirkko |
| author_facet | Kaave Piia Storsjö Isabell Heikkinen Pirkko |
| author_sort | Kaave Piia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The ultimate goal of the public procurement remedies system is to effectively enforce procurement rules and ensure that tenderers can appeal against contract awards and other decisions as efficiently and quickly as possible. In Finland, multiple measures have been taken to make the public procurement appeal system more effective, but studies show that reforms have made it more difficult and less attractive to appeal. The current system does not adequately provide access to justice to economic operators and the conventional approach to reforms has not done the job. To radically improve the public procurement remedies system, we discuss the integration of lean thinking, proactive law and legal design to improve access to justice in the public procurement appeal system. Lean thinking, traditionally used in manufacturing, focuses on efficient value creation and continuous improvement, helping streamline processes and improve the quality of justice. Proactive law aims to create legal frameworks that prevent problems before they arise, promote positive outcomes and create opportunities and value. Legal design combines legal thinking with design thinking to make legal systems, including processes, policies and documents, more user-friendly, understandable, transparent and accessible. We identified the following dimensions that integrate these three approaches: proactivity, continuous improvement, user-centricity, multi-professional collaboration, streamlining processes and design dimensions. As a result, we argue that the integration of lean thinking, proactive law and legal design offers promising avenues to improve the efficiency and efficacy of the existing public procurement appeal system. However, to move forward, additional data and empirical studies are needed to further evaluate the current situation, test the integration and assess their impact on existing challenges. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9bee9da6083947e5b0e2e2939346306c |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2674-4619 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-03-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | TalTech Journal of European Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-9bee9da6083947e5b0e2e2939346306c2025-08-20T02:08:12ZengSciendoTalTech Journal of European Studies2674-46192025-03-0115115517810.2478/bjes-2025-0009Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal designKaave Piia0Storsjö Isabell1Heikkinen Pirkko21Faculty of Law, University of Lapland, Yliopistonkatu 8, Rovaniemi 96300, Finland2Faculty of Law, University of Turku, Caloniankuja 3, Turku 20500, Finland3Faculty of Law, University of Lapland, Yliopistonkatu 8 Rovaniemi 96300, FinlandThe ultimate goal of the public procurement remedies system is to effectively enforce procurement rules and ensure that tenderers can appeal against contract awards and other decisions as efficiently and quickly as possible. In Finland, multiple measures have been taken to make the public procurement appeal system more effective, but studies show that reforms have made it more difficult and less attractive to appeal. The current system does not adequately provide access to justice to economic operators and the conventional approach to reforms has not done the job. To radically improve the public procurement remedies system, we discuss the integration of lean thinking, proactive law and legal design to improve access to justice in the public procurement appeal system. Lean thinking, traditionally used in manufacturing, focuses on efficient value creation and continuous improvement, helping streamline processes and improve the quality of justice. Proactive law aims to create legal frameworks that prevent problems before they arise, promote positive outcomes and create opportunities and value. Legal design combines legal thinking with design thinking to make legal systems, including processes, policies and documents, more user-friendly, understandable, transparent and accessible. We identified the following dimensions that integrate these three approaches: proactivity, continuous improvement, user-centricity, multi-professional collaboration, streamlining processes and design dimensions. As a result, we argue that the integration of lean thinking, proactive law and legal design offers promising avenues to improve the efficiency and efficacy of the existing public procurement appeal system. However, to move forward, additional data and empirical studies are needed to further evaluate the current situation, test the integration and assess their impact on existing challenges.https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0009access to justicefair triallean thinkinglegal designproactive lawpublic procurement |
| spellingShingle | Kaave Piia Storsjö Isabell Heikkinen Pirkko Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design TalTech Journal of European Studies access to justice fair trial lean thinking legal design proactive law public procurement |
| title | Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design |
| title_full | Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design |
| title_fullStr | Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design |
| title_full_unstemmed | Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design |
| title_short | Access to justice in public procurement: improving judicial review through lean thinking, proactive law and legal design |
| title_sort | access to justice in public procurement improving judicial review through lean thinking proactive law and legal design |
| topic | access to justice fair trial lean thinking legal design proactive law public procurement |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0009 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kaavepiia accesstojusticeinpublicprocurementimprovingjudicialreviewthroughleanthinkingproactivelawandlegaldesign AT storsjoisabell accesstojusticeinpublicprocurementimprovingjudicialreviewthroughleanthinkingproactivelawandlegaldesign AT heikkinenpirkko accesstojusticeinpublicprocurementimprovingjudicialreviewthroughleanthinkingproactivelawandlegaldesign |