What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?
The idea of evidence-alone being central to generation of scientific knowledge in general and medical-scientific knowledge in particular may not have a historical context to it and therefore needs to be looked into.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Sunil Kumar Raina, Raman Kumar |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jascp.jascp_55_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
“Knowledge was clearly associated with education.” epistemic positioning in the context of informed choice: a scoping review and secondary qualitative analysis
by: Niamh Ireland-Blake, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Epistemic Responsibility in Political Discourse (on Materials of D. Trump’s Press Conference)
by: A. I. Chepurnaya
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Expanding the Epistemic Framework of Tuberculosis beyond the National Program to Develop Adaptive Health Policy for Better Control
by: Sunil Kumar Raina
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Rethinking the Epistemic Compass
by: Fran Collyer, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Socio-epistemic analysis of scientific knowledge production in little science research
by: Alberto Pepe
Published: (2008-12-01)