What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?

The idea of evidence-alone being central to generation of scientific knowledge in general and medical-scientific knowledge in particular may not have a historical context to it and therefore needs to be looked into.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunil Kumar Raina, Raman Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jascp.jascp_55_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849323992464228352
author Sunil Kumar Raina
Raman Kumar
author_facet Sunil Kumar Raina
Raman Kumar
author_sort Sunil Kumar Raina
collection DOAJ
description The idea of evidence-alone being central to generation of scientific knowledge in general and medical-scientific knowledge in particular may not have a historical context to it and therefore needs to be looked into.
format Article
id doaj-art-9bebc2da3a1e42c9a3f5d5fcb4321476
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-364X
2772-3658
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice
spelling doaj-art-9bebc2da3a1e42c9a3f5d5fcb43214762025-08-20T03:48:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice2772-364X2772-36582025-01-01611310.4103/jascp.jascp_55_24What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?Sunil Kumar RainaRaman KumarThe idea of evidence-alone being central to generation of scientific knowledge in general and medical-scientific knowledge in particular may not have a historical context to it and therefore needs to be looked into.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jascp.jascp_55_24evidence generationpositive epistemicscience
spellingShingle Sunil Kumar Raina
Raman Kumar
What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?
Journal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice
evidence generation
positive epistemic
science
title What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?
title_full What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?
title_fullStr What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?
title_full_unstemmed What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?
title_short What Defines the Philosophy of Science – Positive Epistemic, Evidence Generation, or a Combination of Both?
title_sort what defines the philosophy of science positive epistemic evidence generation or a combination of both
topic evidence generation
positive epistemic
science
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jascp.jascp_55_24
work_keys_str_mv AT sunilkumarraina whatdefinesthephilosophyofsciencepositiveepistemicevidencegenerationoracombinationofboth
AT ramankumar whatdefinesthephilosophyofsciencepositiveepistemicevidencegenerationoracombinationofboth