Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible Assets

In conditions of digital economy development intangible assets act as one of key sources of progress, as a strategic factor influencing conditions and prospects of the national finance system development, which stipulates topicality and timeliness of the research. The absence of a simple definition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. V. Manuylenko, M. V. Galasova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 2022-02-01
Series:Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1254
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849244310195666944
author V. V. Manuylenko
M. V. Galasova
author_facet V. V. Manuylenko
M. V. Galasova
author_sort V. V. Manuylenko
collection DOAJ
description In conditions of digital economy development intangible assets act as one of key sources of progress, as a strategic factor influencing conditions and prospects of the national finance system development, which stipulates topicality and timeliness of the research. The absence of a simple definition of the notion ’intangible assets’ in Russian and overseas literature, its close connection and coincidence with such terms as ‘intangible, intellectual assets’, ‘goodwill’, ‘intellectual capital’, poor understanding of industrial purpose of intangible assets in organization business make up debatable aspects of the paper. The goal of the research is to reveal the economic content and to estimate capacity of organization intangible assets. As for the theoretical aspect of the research the author studies the notion ‘organization intangible assets’ in view of Russian and overseas legislation, identifies its distinctive characteristic and shows the logical interrelation between such notions as ‘intangible, intellectual assets’, ‘goodwill’, ‘intellectual capital’. Concerning the practical field of the research the author grounds the choice of J. Tobin coefficient both for estimation of intangible asset capacity and assessing the risk of getting / missing profits of their use. As a result a low capacity of intangible assets was elicited, which at the same time show risk of inefficiency use.
format Article
id doaj-art-9bd693c367644bc4b23182fe4e59929f
institution Kabale University
issn 2413-2829
2587-9251
language Russian
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
record_format Article
series Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова
spelling doaj-art-9bd693c367644bc4b23182fe4e59929f2025-08-20T03:59:12ZrusPlekhanov Russian University of EconomicsВестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова2413-28292587-92512022-02-010112313010.21686/2413-2829-2022-1-123-130919Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible AssetsV. V. Manuylenko0M. V. Galasova1North-Caucasus Federal UniversityNorth Ossetian state University named after Kosta Levanovich KhetagurovIn conditions of digital economy development intangible assets act as one of key sources of progress, as a strategic factor influencing conditions and prospects of the national finance system development, which stipulates topicality and timeliness of the research. The absence of a simple definition of the notion ’intangible assets’ in Russian and overseas literature, its close connection and coincidence with such terms as ‘intangible, intellectual assets’, ‘goodwill’, ‘intellectual capital’, poor understanding of industrial purpose of intangible assets in organization business make up debatable aspects of the paper. The goal of the research is to reveal the economic content and to estimate capacity of organization intangible assets. As for the theoretical aspect of the research the author studies the notion ‘organization intangible assets’ in view of Russian and overseas legislation, identifies its distinctive characteristic and shows the logical interrelation between such notions as ‘intangible, intellectual assets’, ‘goodwill’, ‘intellectual capital’. Concerning the practical field of the research the author grounds the choice of J. Tobin coefficient both for estimation of intangible asset capacity and assessing the risk of getting / missing profits of their use. As a result a low capacity of intangible assets was elicited, which at the same time show risk of inefficiency use.https://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1254intangibleintellectual assetsintellectual capitalcapacityj. tobin coefficientrisk missing
spellingShingle V. V. Manuylenko
M. V. Galasova
Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible Assets
Вестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова
intangible
intellectual assets
intellectual capital
capacity
j. tobin coefficient
risk missing
title Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible Assets
title_full Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible Assets
title_fullStr Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible Assets
title_full_unstemmed Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible Assets
title_short Debatable Provisions Concerning Characteritic and Estimation of Capacity of Organization Intangible Assets
title_sort debatable provisions concerning characteritic and estimation of capacity of organization intangible assets
topic intangible
intellectual assets
intellectual capital
capacity
j. tobin coefficient
risk missing
url https://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/1254
work_keys_str_mv AT vvmanuylenko debatableprovisionsconcerningcharacteriticandestimationofcapacityoforganizationintangibleassets
AT mvgalasova debatableprovisionsconcerningcharacteriticandestimationofcapacityoforganizationintangibleassets