An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea

This study attempts to examine how cancer drug lags in South Korea, along with submission-to-approval and approval-to-reimbursement decision time spans, have evolved over the last decade, from 2013 to 2022. For the same set of cancer drugs, the drug lags observed in South Korea were compared with th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sung Kyung Lee, Jong Hyuk Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-08-01
Series:Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251363855
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849389806608449536
author Sung Kyung Lee
Jong Hyuk Lee
author_facet Sung Kyung Lee
Jong Hyuk Lee
author_sort Sung Kyung Lee
collection DOAJ
description This study attempts to examine how cancer drug lags in South Korea, along with submission-to-approval and approval-to-reimbursement decision time spans, have evolved over the last decade, from 2013 to 2022. For the same set of cancer drugs, the drug lags observed in South Korea were compared with those of United States, European Union, and Japan. Multivariate linear regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to conduct quantitative analyses. Compared with the 3 other advanced medicine agencies, South Korea (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]) displays an average delay of 1 to 2 years in submission and approval over the sample period. However, the average review processing time is much shorter than the submission and approval lags, and the MFDS fares even better than the European Union (European Medicines Agency [EMA]) in terms of reviewing efficiency. Notable progress has been made in addressing delays in the reimbursement decision process, roughly cut in half over the period, whereas other lags are rather elongated. The multivariate regression results confirm that the variations in approval delays in South Korea are largely associated with submission delays. The fact that South Korea fares poorly in submission and ensuing approval lags compared to other nations and regions with advanced medicine agencies mirrors the reality that South Korea is still not yet being considered as one of the most preferred testing grounds for innovative cancer drugs. The findings highlight that the goal of regulators should be geared towards ensuring more equitable access to oncology drugs in a timely manner for the Korean population.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b9d1b0100b045cfa58dd74c8b0a9226
institution Kabale University
issn 0046-9580
1945-7243
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
spelling doaj-art-9b9d1b0100b045cfa58dd74c8b0a92262025-08-20T03:41:50ZengSAGE PublishingInquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing0046-95801945-72432025-08-016210.1177/00469580251363855An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South KoreaSung Kyung Lee0Jong Hyuk Lee1Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, Sejong, Republic of KoreaCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of KoreaThis study attempts to examine how cancer drug lags in South Korea, along with submission-to-approval and approval-to-reimbursement decision time spans, have evolved over the last decade, from 2013 to 2022. For the same set of cancer drugs, the drug lags observed in South Korea were compared with those of United States, European Union, and Japan. Multivariate linear regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to conduct quantitative analyses. Compared with the 3 other advanced medicine agencies, South Korea (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]) displays an average delay of 1 to 2 years in submission and approval over the sample period. However, the average review processing time is much shorter than the submission and approval lags, and the MFDS fares even better than the European Union (European Medicines Agency [EMA]) in terms of reviewing efficiency. Notable progress has been made in addressing delays in the reimbursement decision process, roughly cut in half over the period, whereas other lags are rather elongated. The multivariate regression results confirm that the variations in approval delays in South Korea are largely associated with submission delays. The fact that South Korea fares poorly in submission and ensuing approval lags compared to other nations and regions with advanced medicine agencies mirrors the reality that South Korea is still not yet being considered as one of the most preferred testing grounds for innovative cancer drugs. The findings highlight that the goal of regulators should be geared towards ensuring more equitable access to oncology drugs in a timely manner for the Korean population.https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251363855
spellingShingle Sung Kyung Lee
Jong Hyuk Lee
An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea
Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
title An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea
title_full An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea
title_fullStr An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea
title_full_unstemmed An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea
title_short An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea
title_sort empirical analysis of anti cancer drug lags in south korea
url https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251363855
work_keys_str_mv AT sungkyunglee anempiricalanalysisofanticancerdruglagsinsouthkorea
AT jonghyuklee anempiricalanalysisofanticancerdruglagsinsouthkorea
AT sungkyunglee empiricalanalysisofanticancerdruglagsinsouthkorea
AT jonghyuklee empiricalanalysisofanticancerdruglagsinsouthkorea