Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized Study

Background. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an ED sepsis protocol on the time to antibiotics for emergency department (ED) patients with severe sepsis. Methods. Quasiexperimental prospective study was conducted at the emergency department. Consecutive patients with severe se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rifat S. Rehmani, Javed I. Memon, Ayman Al-Gammal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Critical Care Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/410430
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850179722373234688
author Rifat S. Rehmani
Javed I. Memon
Ayman Al-Gammal
author_facet Rifat S. Rehmani
Javed I. Memon
Ayman Al-Gammal
author_sort Rifat S. Rehmani
collection DOAJ
description Background. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an ED sepsis protocol on the time to antibiotics for emergency department (ED) patients with severe sepsis. Methods. Quasiexperimental prospective study was conducted at the emergency department. Consecutive patients with severe sepsis were included before and after the implementation of a sepsis protocol. The outcome measures were time from recognition of severe sepsis/septic shock to first antibiotic dose delivery and the appropriateness of initial choice of antibiotics based on the presumed source of infection. Results. There were 47 patients in preintervention group and 112 patients in postintervention group. Before implementation, mean time from severe sepsis recognition to delivery of antibiotics was 140 ± 97 minutes. During the intervention period, the mean time was 68 ± 67 minutes, with an overall reduction of 72 minutes. The protocol resulted in an overall improvement of 37% in the compliance, as 62% received appropriate initial antibiotics for the presumed source of infection as compared to 25% before the start of protocol. Conclusion. Implementation of ED sepsis protocol improved the time from recognition of severe sepsis/septic shock to first antibiotic dose delivery as well as the appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b8a7bff7e654e109cd9a45c58b08e3a
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-1305
2090-1313
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Critical Care Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-9b8a7bff7e654e109cd9a45c58b08e3a2025-08-20T02:18:25ZengWileyCritical Care Research and Practice2090-13052090-13132014-01-01201410.1155/2014/410430410430Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized StudyRifat S. Rehmani0Javed I. Memon1Ayman Al-Gammal2Department of Emergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, P.O. Box 2477, Al-Ahsa, Saudi ArabiaIntensive Care, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, P.O. Box 2477, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi ArabiaInfectious Diseases/Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi ArabiaBackground. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an ED sepsis protocol on the time to antibiotics for emergency department (ED) patients with severe sepsis. Methods. Quasiexperimental prospective study was conducted at the emergency department. Consecutive patients with severe sepsis were included before and after the implementation of a sepsis protocol. The outcome measures were time from recognition of severe sepsis/septic shock to first antibiotic dose delivery and the appropriateness of initial choice of antibiotics based on the presumed source of infection. Results. There were 47 patients in preintervention group and 112 patients in postintervention group. Before implementation, mean time from severe sepsis recognition to delivery of antibiotics was 140 ± 97 minutes. During the intervention period, the mean time was 68 ± 67 minutes, with an overall reduction of 72 minutes. The protocol resulted in an overall improvement of 37% in the compliance, as 62% received appropriate initial antibiotics for the presumed source of infection as compared to 25% before the start of protocol. Conclusion. Implementation of ED sepsis protocol improved the time from recognition of severe sepsis/septic shock to first antibiotic dose delivery as well as the appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/410430
spellingShingle Rifat S. Rehmani
Javed I. Memon
Ayman Al-Gammal
Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized Study
Critical Care Research and Practice
title Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized Study
title_full Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized Study
title_fullStr Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized Study
title_short Implementing a Collaborative Sepsis Protocol on the Time to Antibiotics in an Emergency Department of a Saudi Hospital: Quasi Randomized Study
title_sort implementing a collaborative sepsis protocol on the time to antibiotics in an emergency department of a saudi hospital quasi randomized study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/410430
work_keys_str_mv AT rifatsrehmani implementingacollaborativesepsisprotocolonthetimetoantibioticsinanemergencydepartmentofasaudihospitalquasirandomizedstudy
AT javedimemon implementingacollaborativesepsisprotocolonthetimetoantibioticsinanemergencydepartmentofasaudihospitalquasirandomizedstudy
AT aymanalgammal implementingacollaborativesepsisprotocolonthetimetoantibioticsinanemergencydepartmentofasaudihospitalquasirandomizedstudy