The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Supine sleep position is associated with stillbirth, likely secondary to inferior vena cava compression, and a reduction in cardiac output (CO) and uteroplacental perfusion. Evidence for the effects of prone position in pregnancy is less clear. This study aimed to de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Ormesher, Jessica Catchpole, Linda Peacock, Heather Pitt, Anastasia Fabian-Hunt, Dexter Hayes, Claudia Popp, Jason M Carson, Raoul van Loon, Lynne Warrander, Karli Büchling, Alexander E P Heazell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287804
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540129273577472
author Laura Ormesher
Jessica Catchpole
Linda Peacock
Heather Pitt
Anastasia Fabian-Hunt
Dexter Hayes
Claudia Popp
Jason M Carson
Raoul van Loon
Lynne Warrander
Karli Büchling
Alexander E P Heazell
author_facet Laura Ormesher
Jessica Catchpole
Linda Peacock
Heather Pitt
Anastasia Fabian-Hunt
Dexter Hayes
Claudia Popp
Jason M Carson
Raoul van Loon
Lynne Warrander
Karli Büchling
Alexander E P Heazell
author_sort Laura Ormesher
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Supine sleep position is associated with stillbirth, likely secondary to inferior vena cava compression, and a reduction in cardiac output (CO) and uteroplacental perfusion. Evidence for the effects of prone position in pregnancy is less clear. This study aimed to determine the effect maternal prone position on maternal haemodynamics and fetal heart rate, compared with left lateral position.<h4>Methods</h4>Twenty-one women >28 weeks' gestation underwent non-invasive CO monitoring (Cheetah) every 5 minutes and continuous fetal heart rate monitoring (MONICA) in left lateral (20 minutes), prone (30 minutes), followed by left lateral (20 minutes). Anxiety and comfort were assessed by questionnaires. Regression analyses (adjusted for time) compared variables between positions. The information derived from the primary study was used in an existing mathematical model of maternal circulation in pregnancy, to determine whether occlusion of the inferior vena cava could account for the observed effects. In addition, a scoping review was performed to identify reported clinical, haemodynamic and fetal effects of maternal prone position; studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes or effects or maternal prone position in pregnancy. Study records were grouped by publication type for ease of data synthesis and critical analysis. Meta-analysis was performed where there were sufficient studies.<h4>Results</h4>Maternal blood pressure (BP) and total vascular resistance (TVR) were increased in prone (sBP 109 vs 104 mmHg, p = 0.03; dBP 74 vs 67 mmHg, p = 0.003; TVR 1302 vs 1075 dyne.s-1cm-5, p = 0.03). CO was reduced in prone (5.7 vs 7.1 mL/minute, p = 0.003). Fetal heart rate, variability and decelerations were unaltered. However, fetal accelerations were less common in prone position (86% vs 95%, p = 0.03). Anxiety was reduced after the procedure, compared to beforehand (p = 0.002), despite a marginal decline in comfort (p = 0.04).The model predicted that if occlusion of the inferior vena cava occurred, the sBP, dBP and CO would generally decrease. However, the TVR remained relatively consistent, which implies that the MAP and CO decrease at a similar rate when occlusion occurs. The scoping review found that maternal and fetal outcomes from 47 included case reports of prone positioning during pregnancy were generally favourable. Meta-analysis of three prospective studies investigating maternal haemodynamic effects of prone position found an increase in sBP and maternal heart rate, but no effect on respiratory rate, oxygen saturation or baseline fetal heart rate (though there was significant heterogeneity between studies).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Prone position was associated with a reduction in CO but an uncertain effect on fetal wellbeing. The decline in CO may be due to caval compression, as supported by the computational model. Further work is needed to optimise the safety of prone positioning in pregnancy.<h4>Trial registration</h4>This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04586283).
format Article
id doaj-art-9b8a1bb995fe42579c4dd9d19470910e
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-9b8a1bb995fe42579c4dd9d19470910e2025-02-05T05:32:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-011810e028780410.1371/journal.pone.0287804The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.Laura OrmesherJessica CatchpoleLinda PeacockHeather PittAnastasia Fabian-HuntDexter HayesClaudia PoppJason M CarsonRaoul van LoonLynne WarranderKarli BüchlingAlexander E P Heazell<h4>Introduction</h4>Supine sleep position is associated with stillbirth, likely secondary to inferior vena cava compression, and a reduction in cardiac output (CO) and uteroplacental perfusion. Evidence for the effects of prone position in pregnancy is less clear. This study aimed to determine the effect maternal prone position on maternal haemodynamics and fetal heart rate, compared with left lateral position.<h4>Methods</h4>Twenty-one women >28 weeks' gestation underwent non-invasive CO monitoring (Cheetah) every 5 minutes and continuous fetal heart rate monitoring (MONICA) in left lateral (20 minutes), prone (30 minutes), followed by left lateral (20 minutes). Anxiety and comfort were assessed by questionnaires. Regression analyses (adjusted for time) compared variables between positions. The information derived from the primary study was used in an existing mathematical model of maternal circulation in pregnancy, to determine whether occlusion of the inferior vena cava could account for the observed effects. In addition, a scoping review was performed to identify reported clinical, haemodynamic and fetal effects of maternal prone position; studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes or effects or maternal prone position in pregnancy. Study records were grouped by publication type for ease of data synthesis and critical analysis. Meta-analysis was performed where there were sufficient studies.<h4>Results</h4>Maternal blood pressure (BP) and total vascular resistance (TVR) were increased in prone (sBP 109 vs 104 mmHg, p = 0.03; dBP 74 vs 67 mmHg, p = 0.003; TVR 1302 vs 1075 dyne.s-1cm-5, p = 0.03). CO was reduced in prone (5.7 vs 7.1 mL/minute, p = 0.003). Fetal heart rate, variability and decelerations were unaltered. However, fetal accelerations were less common in prone position (86% vs 95%, p = 0.03). Anxiety was reduced after the procedure, compared to beforehand (p = 0.002), despite a marginal decline in comfort (p = 0.04).The model predicted that if occlusion of the inferior vena cava occurred, the sBP, dBP and CO would generally decrease. However, the TVR remained relatively consistent, which implies that the MAP and CO decrease at a similar rate when occlusion occurs. The scoping review found that maternal and fetal outcomes from 47 included case reports of prone positioning during pregnancy were generally favourable. Meta-analysis of three prospective studies investigating maternal haemodynamic effects of prone position found an increase in sBP and maternal heart rate, but no effect on respiratory rate, oxygen saturation or baseline fetal heart rate (though there was significant heterogeneity between studies).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Prone position was associated with a reduction in CO but an uncertain effect on fetal wellbeing. The decline in CO may be due to caval compression, as supported by the computational model. Further work is needed to optimise the safety of prone positioning in pregnancy.<h4>Trial registration</h4>This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04586283).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287804
spellingShingle Laura Ormesher
Jessica Catchpole
Linda Peacock
Heather Pitt
Anastasia Fabian-Hunt
Dexter Hayes
Claudia Popp
Jason M Carson
Raoul van Loon
Lynne Warrander
Karli Büchling
Alexander E P Heazell
The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.
PLoS ONE
title The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.
title_full The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.
title_fullStr The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.
title_short The effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester-A primary cohort study with a scoping review.
title_sort effect of prone positioning on maternal haemodynamics and fetal wellbeing in the third trimester a primary cohort study with a scoping review
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287804
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraormesher theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT jessicacatchpole theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT lindapeacock theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT heatherpitt theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT anastasiafabianhunt theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT dexterhayes theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT claudiapopp theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT jasonmcarson theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT raoulvanloon theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT lynnewarrander theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT karlibuchling theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT alexanderepheazell theeffectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT lauraormesher effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT jessicacatchpole effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT lindapeacock effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT heatherpitt effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT anastasiafabianhunt effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT dexterhayes effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT claudiapopp effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT jasonmcarson effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT raoulvanloon effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT lynnewarrander effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT karlibuchling effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview
AT alexanderepheazell effectofpronepositioningonmaternalhaemodynamicsandfetalwellbeinginthethirdtrimesteraprimarycohortstudywithascopingreview