Zwierzę w filozofii moralności
The discussion about the rights of animals is always up-to-date. The dichotomy division into philoanimalists and philohominists, although reasonable, is not satisfactory to everyone. It is too strongly associated with the division into people and things in Roman law. To avoid this association in the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
2004-12-01
|
| Series: | Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6835 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832573569286012928 |
|---|---|
| author | Wiesław Dyk |
| author_facet | Wiesław Dyk |
| author_sort | Wiesław Dyk |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The discussion about the rights of animals is always up-to-date. The dichotomy division into philoanimalists and philohominists, although reasonable, is not satisfactory to everyone. It is too strongly associated with the division into people and things in Roman law. To avoid this association in the context of biocentric trends in ecological ethics, accomplishments of evolutionary psychology and the concept of animal welfare, it is suggested that a third moral dimension dealing with creatures with highly developed nervous system be introduced between moral objectivity of creatures with high perception and moral subjectivity of people - creatures characterized by self-awareness and reflexive awareness. Human beings on the one hand are responsible for recognizing their rights given by nature and on the other hand, they are obliged to create a law to protect themselves. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9b5e8c1c4c824136b8f28ed2f8fe5186 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1733-1218 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2004-12-01 |
| publisher | Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae |
| spelling | doaj-art-9b5e8c1c4c824136b8f28ed2f8fe51862025-02-02T03:47:18ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieStudia Ecologiae et Bioethicae1733-12182004-12-012110.21697/seb.2004.2.1.13Zwierzę w filozofii moralnościWiesław Dyk0Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet SzczecińskiThe discussion about the rights of animals is always up-to-date. The dichotomy division into philoanimalists and philohominists, although reasonable, is not satisfactory to everyone. It is too strongly associated with the division into people and things in Roman law. To avoid this association in the context of biocentric trends in ecological ethics, accomplishments of evolutionary psychology and the concept of animal welfare, it is suggested that a third moral dimension dealing with creatures with highly developed nervous system be introduced between moral objectivity of creatures with high perception and moral subjectivity of people - creatures characterized by self-awareness and reflexive awareness. Human beings on the one hand are responsible for recognizing their rights given by nature and on the other hand, they are obliged to create a law to protect themselves.https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6835zwierzętaprawa zwierzątetyka środowiskowa |
| spellingShingle | Wiesław Dyk Zwierzę w filozofii moralności Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae zwierzęta prawa zwierząt etyka środowiskowa |
| title | Zwierzę w filozofii moralności |
| title_full | Zwierzę w filozofii moralności |
| title_fullStr | Zwierzę w filozofii moralności |
| title_full_unstemmed | Zwierzę w filozofii moralności |
| title_short | Zwierzę w filozofii moralności |
| title_sort | zwierze w filozofii moralnosci |
| topic | zwierzęta prawa zwierząt etyka środowiskowa |
| url | https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6835 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wiesławdyk zwierzewfilozofiimoralnosci |