Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>It remains unclear which treatment is the most effective for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer. We conducted a network meta-analysis to address this important issue.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Embase,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuiyu Lin, Tingting Liu, Jun Chen, Guang Li, Jun Dang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252751&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849699735561043968
author Shuiyu Lin
Tingting Liu
Jun Chen
Guang Li
Jun Dang
author_facet Shuiyu Lin
Tingting Liu
Jun Chen
Guang Li
Jun Dang
author_sort Shuiyu Lin
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>It remains unclear which treatment is the most effective for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer. We conducted a network meta-analysis to address this important issue.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of interest, which was reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).<h4>Results</h4>Sixteen RCTs involving 3372 patients and evaluating 15 treatments were included in this network meta-analysis. Ramucirumab+chemotherapy (CT) (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.77) and use of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, including camrelizumab (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.88), sintilimab (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.98), nivolumab (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.94), and pembrolizumab (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98), conferred better OS than CT; however, this OS benefit was not observed for PD-L1 inhibitor (avelumab) and other target agents (trastuzumab, everolimus, gefitinib, and anlotinib). In subgroup analysis, ramucirumab+CT and pembrolizumab showed significant improvement in OS, when compared to CT, in esophageal/EGJ adenocarcinoma (AC) cases; moreover, all PD-1 inhibitors had significant OS advantage over CT in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Based on treatment ranking in terms of OS, ramucirumab+CT and camrelizumab were ranked the best treatments for patients with AC and SCC, respectively.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Ramucirumab+CT and PD-1 inhibitors were superior to CT for previously treated cases of advanced esophageal/EGJ cancer. Ramucirumab+CT seemed to be the most effective treatment in patients with esophageal/EGJ AC, while use of PD-1 inhibitors, especially camrelizumab, was likely to be the optimal treatment in patients with esophageal SCC.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b40e6044c274efba4feb25233a434d5
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-9b40e6044c274efba4feb25233a434d52025-08-20T03:18:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025275110.1371/journal.pone.0252751Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.Shuiyu LinTingting LiuJun ChenGuang LiJun Dang<h4>Background</h4>It remains unclear which treatment is the most effective for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer. We conducted a network meta-analysis to address this important issue.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of interest, which was reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).<h4>Results</h4>Sixteen RCTs involving 3372 patients and evaluating 15 treatments were included in this network meta-analysis. Ramucirumab+chemotherapy (CT) (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.77) and use of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, including camrelizumab (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.88), sintilimab (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.98), nivolumab (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.94), and pembrolizumab (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98), conferred better OS than CT; however, this OS benefit was not observed for PD-L1 inhibitor (avelumab) and other target agents (trastuzumab, everolimus, gefitinib, and anlotinib). In subgroup analysis, ramucirumab+CT and pembrolizumab showed significant improvement in OS, when compared to CT, in esophageal/EGJ adenocarcinoma (AC) cases; moreover, all PD-1 inhibitors had significant OS advantage over CT in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Based on treatment ranking in terms of OS, ramucirumab+CT and camrelizumab were ranked the best treatments for patients with AC and SCC, respectively.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Ramucirumab+CT and PD-1 inhibitors were superior to CT for previously treated cases of advanced esophageal/EGJ cancer. Ramucirumab+CT seemed to be the most effective treatment in patients with esophageal/EGJ AC, while use of PD-1 inhibitors, especially camrelizumab, was likely to be the optimal treatment in patients with esophageal SCC.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252751&type=printable
spellingShingle Shuiyu Lin
Tingting Liu
Jun Chen
Guang Li
Jun Dang
Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.
title_full Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.
title_short Comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A network meta-analysis.
title_sort comparative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer a network meta analysis
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252751&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT shuiyulin comparativeefficacyoftreatmentsforpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedesophagealandesophagogastricjunctioncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT tingtingliu comparativeefficacyoftreatmentsforpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedesophagealandesophagogastricjunctioncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT junchen comparativeefficacyoftreatmentsforpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedesophagealandesophagogastricjunctioncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT guangli comparativeefficacyoftreatmentsforpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedesophagealandesophagogastricjunctioncanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT jundang comparativeefficacyoftreatmentsforpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedesophagealandesophagogastricjunctioncanceranetworkmetaanalysis