Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete

Geopolymer concrete has been regarded as one of the most important green construction materials, which has been restrained in engineering applications partially due to a lack of bond studies. The structural performance of the reinforced concrete components primarily relies on the sufficient bond bet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yifei Cui, Peng Zhang, Jiuwen Bao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9812526
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553210668122112
author Yifei Cui
Peng Zhang
Jiuwen Bao
author_facet Yifei Cui
Peng Zhang
Jiuwen Bao
author_sort Yifei Cui
collection DOAJ
description Geopolymer concrete has been regarded as one of the most important green construction materials, which has been restrained in engineering applications partially due to a lack of bond studies. The structural performance of the reinforced concrete components primarily relies on the sufficient bond between the concrete and the reinforcing bars. Before being utilized in any concrete structure, GPC must demonstrate that it possesses understandable bond behaviour with commercial steel reinforcements. This work presents an experimental investigation on the bond stress of steel bars in reinforced geopolymer concrete (GPC) structures. Standard beam-end pull-out tests were conducted on GPC specimens reinforced with 16 mm plain and ribbed bars that were equipped with electrical resistance strain gauges. The longitudinal variation in the bond stress in the GPC beams during the pull-out tests was calculated and plotted, as well as the stress in steel bars. The cracks on the bond area of the GPC were compared with those of the corresponding ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC), as well as the steel stress and bond stress. The results showed that the relative slip between plain bar and geopolymer concrete varies from 30–450 microns from the loaded end to the free end when the bond stress decreased by 83%. The relative slip between ribbed bar and geopolymer concrete varies from 280–3,000 microns from the loaded end to the free end when the bond stress decreased by 57%. Generally, GPC is different from OPC in terms of bond stress distribution.
format Article
id doaj-art-9aae0704c96b4568841f53f11be05472
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8442
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
spelling doaj-art-9aae0704c96b4568841f53f11be054722025-02-03T05:54:37ZengWileyAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84422020-01-01202010.1155/2020/98125269812526Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer ConcreteYifei Cui0Peng Zhang1Jiuwen Bao2Center for Durability & Sustainability Studies of Shandong ProvinceCenter for Durability & Sustainability Studies of Shandong ProvinceCenter for Durability & Sustainability Studies of Shandong ProvinceGeopolymer concrete has been regarded as one of the most important green construction materials, which has been restrained in engineering applications partially due to a lack of bond studies. The structural performance of the reinforced concrete components primarily relies on the sufficient bond between the concrete and the reinforcing bars. Before being utilized in any concrete structure, GPC must demonstrate that it possesses understandable bond behaviour with commercial steel reinforcements. This work presents an experimental investigation on the bond stress of steel bars in reinforced geopolymer concrete (GPC) structures. Standard beam-end pull-out tests were conducted on GPC specimens reinforced with 16 mm plain and ribbed bars that were equipped with electrical resistance strain gauges. The longitudinal variation in the bond stress in the GPC beams during the pull-out tests was calculated and plotted, as well as the stress in steel bars. The cracks on the bond area of the GPC were compared with those of the corresponding ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC), as well as the steel stress and bond stress. The results showed that the relative slip between plain bar and geopolymer concrete varies from 30–450 microns from the loaded end to the free end when the bond stress decreased by 83%. The relative slip between ribbed bar and geopolymer concrete varies from 280–3,000 microns from the loaded end to the free end when the bond stress decreased by 57%. Generally, GPC is different from OPC in terms of bond stress distribution.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9812526
spellingShingle Yifei Cui
Peng Zhang
Jiuwen Bao
Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
title Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete
title_full Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete
title_fullStr Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete
title_full_unstemmed Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete
title_short Bond Stress between Steel-Reinforced Bars and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete
title_sort bond stress between steel reinforced bars and fly ash based geopolymer concrete
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9812526
work_keys_str_mv AT yifeicui bondstressbetweensteelreinforcedbarsandflyashbasedgeopolymerconcrete
AT pengzhang bondstressbetweensteelreinforcedbarsandflyashbasedgeopolymerconcrete
AT jiuwenbao bondstressbetweensteelreinforcedbarsandflyashbasedgeopolymerconcrete