Mapping the groundwater potential zones in mountainous areas of Southern China using GIS, AHP, and fuzzy AHP
Abstract Rapid identification of groundwater sources is crucial for emergency water supplies. Yudu County (YDC) in Southern China serves as a case study due to its typical mountainous terrain and pressing groundwater demands. To address the limitations of conventional groundwater mapping methods in...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01837-y |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Rapid identification of groundwater sources is crucial for emergency water supplies. Yudu County (YDC) in Southern China serves as a case study due to its typical mountainous terrain and pressing groundwater demands. To address the limitations of conventional groundwater mapping methods in large-scale areas with sparse data, this study integrates remote sensing (RS), geographic information systems (GIS), and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques to delineate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) in YDC. Following a series of correlation tests, seven assessment indicators were selected from various groundwater influencing factors, including two innovative ones: terrestrial water storage change (TWSC) and spring flow. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy AHP (FAHP) models were employed to calculate factor weights, and GWPZ maps were generated using weighted overlay analysis in GIS. The model performance was validated using borewell data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and yield prediction models. Additionally, four water enrichment types and their spatial distribution were identified by field investigations and yield prediction assessments. Results indicated a remarkable similarity between GWPZs delineated by AHP and FAHP, categorized into five classes: very high (13.92% for AHP and 14.33% for FAHP), high (26.29 and 27.55%), medium (29.33 and 28.14%), low (20.66 and 21.50%), and very low (9.80 and 8.48%). The area under the curve (AUC) for FAHP was 85.09%, slightly higher than the 84.41% of AHP, while the correlation coefficient (R2 of the prediction model improved from 0.747 to 0.817 with FAHP. These findings confirmed the reliability of combining GIS and MCDA methods to delineate GWPZs, with FAHP demonstrating an advantage over AHP. The proposed methodology and resulting mapping significantly enhance sustainable water resource management and development in YDC, offering a practical framework for rapid groundwater investigations in disaster response, as well as for long-term water security planning in similar mountainous environments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2045-2322 |