Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.

<h4>Background</h4>Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been extensively developed for cancer risk prediction in European populations, but their effectiveness in the Chinese population remains uncertain.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We constructed 80 PRSs for the 13 most common c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meng Zhu, Xia Zhu, Yuting Han, Zhimin Ma, Chen Ji, Tianpei Wang, Caiwang Yan, Ci Song, Canqing Yu, Dianjianyi Sun, Yue Jiang, Jiaping Chen, Ling Yang, Yiping Chen, Huaidong Du, Robin Walters, Iona Y Millwood, Juncheng Dai, Hongxia Ma, Zhengdong Zhang, Zhengming Chen, Zhibin Hu, Jun Lv, Guangfu Jin, Liming Li, Hongbing Shen, China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-02-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004534
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849328818496471040
author Meng Zhu
Xia Zhu
Yuting Han
Zhimin Ma
Chen Ji
Tianpei Wang
Caiwang Yan
Ci Song
Canqing Yu
Dianjianyi Sun
Yue Jiang
Jiaping Chen
Ling Yang
Yiping Chen
Huaidong Du
Robin Walters
Iona Y Millwood
Juncheng Dai
Hongxia Ma
Zhengdong Zhang
Zhengming Chen
Zhibin Hu
Jun Lv
Guangfu Jin
Liming Li
Hongbing Shen
China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
author_facet Meng Zhu
Xia Zhu
Yuting Han
Zhimin Ma
Chen Ji
Tianpei Wang
Caiwang Yan
Ci Song
Canqing Yu
Dianjianyi Sun
Yue Jiang
Jiaping Chen
Ling Yang
Yiping Chen
Huaidong Du
Robin Walters
Iona Y Millwood
Juncheng Dai
Hongxia Ma
Zhengdong Zhang
Zhengming Chen
Zhibin Hu
Jun Lv
Guangfu Jin
Liming Li
Hongbing Shen
China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
author_sort Meng Zhu
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been extensively developed for cancer risk prediction in European populations, but their effectiveness in the Chinese population remains uncertain.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We constructed 80 PRSs for the 13 most common cancers using seven schemes and evaluated these PRSs in 100,219 participants from the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB). The optimal PRSs with the highest discriminatory ability were used to define genetic risk, and their site-specific and cross-cancer associations were assessed. We modeled 10-year absolute risk trajectories for each cancer across risk strata defined by PRSs and modifiable risk scores and quantified the explained relative risk (ERR) of PRSs with modifiable risk factors for different cancers. More than 60% (50/80) of the PRSs demonstrated significant associations with the corresponding cancer outcomes. Optimal PRSs for nine common cancers were identified, with each standard deviation increase significantly associated with corresponding cancer risk (hazard ratios (HRs) ranging from 1.20 to 1.76). Compared with participants at low genetic risk and reduced modifiable risk scores, those with high genetic risk and elevated modifiable risk scores had the highest risk of incident cancer, with HRs ranging from 1.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-3.48 for cervical cancer, P = 0.020) to 8.26 (95% CI: 1.92-35.46 for prostate cancer, P = 0.005). We observed nine significant cross-cancer associations for PRSs and found the integration of PRSs significantly increased the prediction accuracy for most cancers. The PRSs contributed 2.6%-20.3%, while modifiable risk factors explained 2.3%-16.7% of the ERR in the Chinese population.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The integration of existing evidence has facilitated the development of PRSs associated with nine common cancer risks in the Chinese population, potentially improving clinical risk assessment.
format Article
id doaj-art-9a748508e9df4403beb4e6bbeda10bd7
institution Kabale University
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Medicine
spelling doaj-art-9a748508e9df4403beb4e6bbeda10bd72025-08-20T03:47:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762025-02-01222e100453410.1371/journal.pmed.1004534Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.Meng ZhuXia ZhuYuting HanZhimin MaChen JiTianpei WangCaiwang YanCi SongCanqing YuDianjianyi SunYue JiangJiaping ChenLing YangYiping ChenHuaidong DuRobin WaltersIona Y MillwoodJuncheng DaiHongxia MaZhengdong ZhangZhengming ChenZhibin HuJun LvGuangfu JinLiming LiHongbing ShenChina Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group<h4>Background</h4>Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been extensively developed for cancer risk prediction in European populations, but their effectiveness in the Chinese population remains uncertain.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We constructed 80 PRSs for the 13 most common cancers using seven schemes and evaluated these PRSs in 100,219 participants from the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB). The optimal PRSs with the highest discriminatory ability were used to define genetic risk, and their site-specific and cross-cancer associations were assessed. We modeled 10-year absolute risk trajectories for each cancer across risk strata defined by PRSs and modifiable risk scores and quantified the explained relative risk (ERR) of PRSs with modifiable risk factors for different cancers. More than 60% (50/80) of the PRSs demonstrated significant associations with the corresponding cancer outcomes. Optimal PRSs for nine common cancers were identified, with each standard deviation increase significantly associated with corresponding cancer risk (hazard ratios (HRs) ranging from 1.20 to 1.76). Compared with participants at low genetic risk and reduced modifiable risk scores, those with high genetic risk and elevated modifiable risk scores had the highest risk of incident cancer, with HRs ranging from 1.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-3.48 for cervical cancer, P = 0.020) to 8.26 (95% CI: 1.92-35.46 for prostate cancer, P = 0.005). We observed nine significant cross-cancer associations for PRSs and found the integration of PRSs significantly increased the prediction accuracy for most cancers. The PRSs contributed 2.6%-20.3%, while modifiable risk factors explained 2.3%-16.7% of the ERR in the Chinese population.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The integration of existing evidence has facilitated the development of PRSs associated with nine common cancer risks in the Chinese population, potentially improving clinical risk assessment.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004534
spellingShingle Meng Zhu
Xia Zhu
Yuting Han
Zhimin Ma
Chen Ji
Tianpei Wang
Caiwang Yan
Ci Song
Canqing Yu
Dianjianyi Sun
Yue Jiang
Jiaping Chen
Ling Yang
Yiping Chen
Huaidong Du
Robin Walters
Iona Y Millwood
Juncheng Dai
Hongxia Ma
Zhengdong Zhang
Zhengming Chen
Zhibin Hu
Jun Lv
Guangfu Jin
Liming Li
Hongbing Shen
China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.
PLoS Medicine
title Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.
title_full Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.
title_fullStr Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.
title_full_unstemmed Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.
title_short Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.
title_sort polygenic risk scores for pan cancer risk prediction in the chinese population a population based cohort study based on the china kadoorie biobank
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004534
work_keys_str_mv AT mengzhu polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT xiazhu polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT yutinghan polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT zhiminma polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT chenji polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT tianpeiwang polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT caiwangyan polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT cisong polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT canqingyu polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT dianjianyisun polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT yuejiang polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT jiapingchen polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT lingyang polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT yipingchen polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT huaidongdu polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT robinwalters polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT ionaymillwood polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT junchengdai polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT hongxiama polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT zhengdongzhang polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT zhengmingchen polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT zhibinhu polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT junlv polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT guangfujin polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT limingli polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT hongbingshen polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank
AT chinakadooriebiobankcollaborativegroup polygenicriskscoresforpancancerriskpredictioninthechinesepopulationapopulationbasedcohortstudybasedonthechinakadooriebiobank