Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationship

Abstract We present the assembly of gene brushes by means of a photolithographic approach that allows us to control the density of end‐immobilized linear double‐stranded DNA polymers coding for entire genes. For 2 kbp DNAs, the mean distance varies from 300 nm, where DNAs are dilute and assume relax...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amnon Buxboim, Shirley S Daube, Roy Bar‐Ziv
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2008-04-01
Series:Molecular Systems Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.20
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850179639765368832
author Amnon Buxboim
Shirley S Daube
Roy Bar‐Ziv
author_facet Amnon Buxboim
Shirley S Daube
Roy Bar‐Ziv
author_sort Amnon Buxboim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We present the assembly of gene brushes by means of a photolithographic approach that allows us to control the density of end‐immobilized linear double‐stranded DNA polymers coding for entire genes. For 2 kbp DNAs, the mean distance varies from 300 nm, where DNAs are dilute and assume relaxed conformations, down to 30 nm, where steric repulsion at dense packing forces stretching out. We investigated the gene‐to‐protein relationship of firefly luciferase under the T7/E.Coli‐extract expression system, as well as transcription‐only reactions with T7 RNA polymerase, and found both systems to be highly sensitive to brush density, conformation, and orientation. A ‘structure–function’ picture emerges in which extension of genes induced by moderate packing exposes coding sequences and improves their interaction with the transcription/translation machinery. However, tighter packing impairs the penetration of the machinery into the brush. The response of expression to two‐dimensional gene crowding at the nanoscale identifies gene brushes as basic controllable units en route to multicomponent synthetic systems. In turn, these brushes could deepen our understanding of biochemical reactions taking place under confinement and molecular crowding in living cells.
format Article
id doaj-art-9a1d233f3a2145c4935bba0730d57fb2
institution OA Journals
issn 1744-4292
language English
publishDate 2008-04-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Molecular Systems Biology
spelling doaj-art-9a1d233f3a2145c4935bba0730d57fb22025-08-20T02:18:27ZengSpringer NatureMolecular Systems Biology1744-42922008-04-01411810.1038/msb.2008.20Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationshipAmnon Buxboim0Shirley S Daube1Roy Bar‐Ziv2Department of Materials and Interfaces, The Weizmann Institute of ScienceChemical Research Support Unit, The Weizmann Institute of ScienceDepartment of Materials and Interfaces, The Weizmann Institute of ScienceAbstract We present the assembly of gene brushes by means of a photolithographic approach that allows us to control the density of end‐immobilized linear double‐stranded DNA polymers coding for entire genes. For 2 kbp DNAs, the mean distance varies from 300 nm, where DNAs are dilute and assume relaxed conformations, down to 30 nm, where steric repulsion at dense packing forces stretching out. We investigated the gene‐to‐protein relationship of firefly luciferase under the T7/E.Coli‐extract expression system, as well as transcription‐only reactions with T7 RNA polymerase, and found both systems to be highly sensitive to brush density, conformation, and orientation. A ‘structure–function’ picture emerges in which extension of genes induced by moderate packing exposes coding sequences and improves their interaction with the transcription/translation machinery. However, tighter packing impairs the penetration of the machinery into the brush. The response of expression to two‐dimensional gene crowding at the nanoscale identifies gene brushes as basic controllable units en route to multicomponent synthetic systems. In turn, these brushes could deepen our understanding of biochemical reactions taking place under confinement and molecular crowding in living cells.https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.20in vitro synthetic biologynano‐biotechnologycell‐free gene expressionmolecular crowdingbiochip
spellingShingle Amnon Buxboim
Shirley S Daube
Roy Bar‐Ziv
Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationship
Molecular Systems Biology
in vitro synthetic biology
nano‐biotechnology
cell‐free gene expression
molecular crowding
biochip
title Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationship
title_full Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationship
title_fullStr Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationship
title_full_unstemmed Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationship
title_short Synthetic gene brushes: a structure–function relationship
title_sort synthetic gene brushes a structure function relationship
topic in vitro synthetic biology
nano‐biotechnology
cell‐free gene expression
molecular crowding
biochip
url https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2008.20
work_keys_str_mv AT amnonbuxboim syntheticgenebrushesastructurefunctionrelationship
AT shirleysdaube syntheticgenebrushesastructurefunctionrelationship
AT roybarziv syntheticgenebrushesastructurefunctionrelationship