Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study

Abstract Objective This study aimed to analyze the profiles and evolution of Staphylococcus aureus in the pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) of 17 hospitals in China from 2016 to 2022. Methods Susceptibility testing was performed to bacterial strains with a uniform monitoring protocol, which was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-Lei Zhang, Jing Liu, Pan Fu, Yi-Xue Wang, Pan-Pan Fan, Jin-Lan Zhou, Xian-Qi Xiang, Hui-Li Shen, Ting-Yan Liu, Ying-Ying Zhang, Ting Zhu, Cai-Yan Zhang, Chuan-Qing Wang, Guo-Ping Lu, Gang-Feng Yan, the China paediatric Intensive care Unit Pathogen Surveillance Network (CHIPS) Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10704-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850253336857542656
author Xiao-Lei Zhang
Jing Liu
Pan Fu
Yi-Xue Wang
Pan-Pan Fan
Jin-Lan Zhou
Xian-Qi Xiang
Hui-Li Shen
Ting-Yan Liu
Ying-Ying Zhang
Ting Zhu
Cai-Yan Zhang
Chuan-Qing Wang
Guo-Ping Lu
Gang-Feng Yan
the China paediatric Intensive care Unit Pathogen Surveillance Network (CHIPS) Study Group
author_facet Xiao-Lei Zhang
Jing Liu
Pan Fu
Yi-Xue Wang
Pan-Pan Fan
Jin-Lan Zhou
Xian-Qi Xiang
Hui-Li Shen
Ting-Yan Liu
Ying-Ying Zhang
Ting Zhu
Cai-Yan Zhang
Chuan-Qing Wang
Guo-Ping Lu
Gang-Feng Yan
the China paediatric Intensive care Unit Pathogen Surveillance Network (CHIPS) Study Group
author_sort Xiao-Lei Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This study aimed to analyze the profiles and evolution of Staphylococcus aureus in the pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) of 17 hospitals in China from 2016 to 2022. Methods Susceptibility testing was performed to bacterial strains with a uniform monitoring protocol, which was provided by the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and used by the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET). The results were interpreted in accordance with the performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing issued by the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Results Twenty-six thousand six hundred thirteen bacterial strains were isolated from 17 PICUs in China from 2016 to 2022, 3,147 of which were Staphylococcus aureus, ranking second among etiological agents of infections from PICUs. In 2022, Staphylococcus aureus had the highest detection rate, being 36.19%. And in 2021, MRSA had the highest detection rate, being 10.35% in Staphylococcus aureus. There were statistically significant differences in the annual detection rate of gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA between the years from 2016 to 2022 (P < 0.05). More males were found with Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but there were no statistical differences in gender distribution between any two years (P < 0.05). The top 3 highest detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus in age groups were infants (1244, 39.7%), toddlers (741, 23.7%), and children at school age and older (731, 23.4%). For MRSA, The top 3 in age groups were infants (91, 38.9%), children at school age and older (87, 29.1%), and toddlers (48, 20.5%). The detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus was statistically different in the distribution of age stratification (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in these two aspects of MRSA (P > 0.05). The top 3 highest detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus in infected sites were the lower respiratory tract (2,552, 81.7%), bloodstream (217, 6.5%), and skin wounds (110, 3.9%). For MRSA, The top 3 in infected sites were the lower respiratory tract (156, 77.9%), skin wounds (47, 8.8%), and bloodstream (15, 6.6%). The detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA was statistically different in the distribution of infected sites (P < 0.05). All the strains of Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive to tigecycline, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin, and linezolid. The resistant rate of Staphylococcus aureus, to penicillin G was as high as 87.5% at least, to erythromycin was as high as 51.8% at least, to benzocillin was as high as 38.0% at least, to cefoxitin was as high as 35.5% at least, and to clindamycin was as high as 32.7% at least. All the strains of MRSA were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and tigecycline. Of these 234 strains of MRSA, 179 (76.5%) were resistant to erythromycin, 116 (49.6%) to clindamycin, 39 (16.7%) to tetracycline, 29 (12.4%) to levofloxacin, 27 (11.5%) to ciprofloxacin, 27 (11.5%) to moxifloxacin, 14 (6.0%) to TMP-SMX, eight (3.4%) to rifampicin, and six (2.6%) to gentamicin. Conclusions Staphylococcus aureus is the most common gram-positive bacterium in PICUs. Infants are most likely to be infected by Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. And the lower respiratory tract is the most common infected site of Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus has a high resistant rates to commonly used antimicriobials in pediatrics, but no strains resistant to vancomycin and/or linezolid were found. When considering Staphylococcus aureus infection clinically, it is necessary to select antimicrobials reasonably based on the patient's age, infected site and local epidemiological characteristics.
format Article
id doaj-art-9a1892bc0aab4e7eb327df53ae38491c
institution OA Journals
issn 1471-2334
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-9a1892bc0aab4e7eb327df53ae38491c2025-08-20T01:57:25ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342025-03-0125111310.1186/s12879-025-10704-0Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective studyXiao-Lei Zhang0Jing Liu1Pan Fu2Yi-Xue Wang3Pan-Pan Fan4Jin-Lan Zhou5Xian-Qi Xiang6Hui-Li Shen7Ting-Yan Liu8Ying-Ying Zhang9Ting Zhu10Cai-Yan Zhang11Chuan-Qing Wang12Guo-Ping Lu13Gang-Feng Yan14the China paediatric Intensive care Unit Pathogen Surveillance Network (CHIPS) Study GroupDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Lab of Microbiology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Lab of Microbiology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Center for Children’s HealthAbstract Objective This study aimed to analyze the profiles and evolution of Staphylococcus aureus in the pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) of 17 hospitals in China from 2016 to 2022. Methods Susceptibility testing was performed to bacterial strains with a uniform monitoring protocol, which was provided by the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and used by the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET). The results were interpreted in accordance with the performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing issued by the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Results Twenty-six thousand six hundred thirteen bacterial strains were isolated from 17 PICUs in China from 2016 to 2022, 3,147 of which were Staphylococcus aureus, ranking second among etiological agents of infections from PICUs. In 2022, Staphylococcus aureus had the highest detection rate, being 36.19%. And in 2021, MRSA had the highest detection rate, being 10.35% in Staphylococcus aureus. There were statistically significant differences in the annual detection rate of gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA between the years from 2016 to 2022 (P < 0.05). More males were found with Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but there were no statistical differences in gender distribution between any two years (P < 0.05). The top 3 highest detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus in age groups were infants (1244, 39.7%), toddlers (741, 23.7%), and children at school age and older (731, 23.4%). For MRSA, The top 3 in age groups were infants (91, 38.9%), children at school age and older (87, 29.1%), and toddlers (48, 20.5%). The detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus was statistically different in the distribution of age stratification (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in these two aspects of MRSA (P > 0.05). The top 3 highest detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus in infected sites were the lower respiratory tract (2,552, 81.7%), bloodstream (217, 6.5%), and skin wounds (110, 3.9%). For MRSA, The top 3 in infected sites were the lower respiratory tract (156, 77.9%), skin wounds (47, 8.8%), and bloodstream (15, 6.6%). The detection rate of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA was statistically different in the distribution of infected sites (P < 0.05). All the strains of Staphylococcus aureus were sensitive to tigecycline, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin, and linezolid. The resistant rate of Staphylococcus aureus, to penicillin G was as high as 87.5% at least, to erythromycin was as high as 51.8% at least, to benzocillin was as high as 38.0% at least, to cefoxitin was as high as 35.5% at least, and to clindamycin was as high as 32.7% at least. All the strains of MRSA were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and tigecycline. Of these 234 strains of MRSA, 179 (76.5%) were resistant to erythromycin, 116 (49.6%) to clindamycin, 39 (16.7%) to tetracycline, 29 (12.4%) to levofloxacin, 27 (11.5%) to ciprofloxacin, 27 (11.5%) to moxifloxacin, 14 (6.0%) to TMP-SMX, eight (3.4%) to rifampicin, and six (2.6%) to gentamicin. Conclusions Staphylococcus aureus is the most common gram-positive bacterium in PICUs. Infants are most likely to be infected by Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. And the lower respiratory tract is the most common infected site of Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus has a high resistant rates to commonly used antimicriobials in pediatrics, but no strains resistant to vancomycin and/or linezolid were found. When considering Staphylococcus aureus infection clinically, it is necessary to select antimicrobials reasonably based on the patient's age, infected site and local epidemiological characteristics.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10704-0Pediatric intensive-care unitStaphylococcus aureusAntimicrobial resistanceEvolution
spellingShingle Xiao-Lei Zhang
Jing Liu
Pan Fu
Yi-Xue Wang
Pan-Pan Fan
Jin-Lan Zhou
Xian-Qi Xiang
Hui-Li Shen
Ting-Yan Liu
Ying-Ying Zhang
Ting Zhu
Cai-Yan Zhang
Chuan-Qing Wang
Guo-Ping Lu
Gang-Feng Yan
the China paediatric Intensive care Unit Pathogen Surveillance Network (CHIPS) Study Group
Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study
BMC Infectious Diseases
Pediatric intensive-care unit
Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrobial resistance
Evolution
title Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study
title_full Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study
title_fullStr Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study
title_short Epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus in Chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022: a multi-center retrospective study
title_sort epidemiological profile and antimicrobial resistance trends of staphylococcus aureus in chinese pediatric intensive care units from 2016 to 2022 a multi center retrospective study
topic Pediatric intensive-care unit
Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrobial resistance
Evolution
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10704-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoleizhang epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT jingliu epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT panfu epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT yixuewang epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT panpanfan epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT jinlanzhou epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT xianqixiang epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT huilishen epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT tingyanliu epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT yingyingzhang epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT tingzhu epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT caiyanzhang epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT chuanqingwang epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT guopinglu epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT gangfengyan epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT thechinapaediatricintensivecareunitpathogensurveillancenetworkchipsstudygroup epidemiologicalprofileandantimicrobialresistancetrendsofstaphylococcusaureusinchinesepediatricintensivecareunitsfrom2016to2022amulticenterretrospectivestudy