Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial Pinning
Background: Mallet finger, a common finger injury, results from damage to the distal extensor tendon, causing a flexion deformity at the distal interphalangeal joint. While conservative treatment with splinting is often effective, surgical intervention using Kirschner wire fixation may be necessary...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Philippine Orthopaedic Association, Inc.
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://philjorthopaedics.org/index.php/pjo/article/view/10905 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841557032233074688 |
|---|---|
| author | Roel Gabriel Rabino Raymar Sibonga |
| author_facet | Roel Gabriel Rabino Raymar Sibonga |
| author_sort | Roel Gabriel Rabino |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Background: Mallet finger, a common finger injury, results from damage to the distal extensor tendon, causing a flexion deformity at the distal interphalangeal joint. While conservative treatment with splinting is often effective, surgical intervention using Kirschner wire fixation may be necessary for complex cases or non-compliant patients.
Objective: This study compared the outcomes of two treatments for tendinous mallet finger: splinting and pinning. Researchers analyzed patient demographics, distal interphalangeal joint range of motion, clinical outcomes, and complication rates between the two groups.
Methodology: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with tendinous mallet finger injury managed conservatively or surgically from 2018 to 2022 in a tertiary hospital.
Result: Both surgical and conservative treatments were effective, as shown by the excellent total active motion scores and satisfactory qDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) outcomes in both groups. However, when comparing the Miller and Crawford criteria, the surgical group consistently showed slightly better functional outcomes.
Conclusion: Both treatments yielded similar results for range of motion, extension lag, and flexion loss, making them equally effective. However, axial pinning may result in better subjective improvement and satisfaction.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-99c6f46e67274518884ce4bf8245b66f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0118-3362 2012-3264 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Philippine Orthopaedic Association, Inc. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics |
| spelling | doaj-art-99c6f46e67274518884ce4bf8245b66f2025-01-07T03:54:22ZengPhilippine Orthopaedic Association, Inc.Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics0118-33622012-32642025-01-01Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial PinningRoel Gabriel Rabino0Raymar Sibonga1De La Salle University Medical Center, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines De La Salle University Medical Center, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines Background: Mallet finger, a common finger injury, results from damage to the distal extensor tendon, causing a flexion deformity at the distal interphalangeal joint. While conservative treatment with splinting is often effective, surgical intervention using Kirschner wire fixation may be necessary for complex cases or non-compliant patients. Objective: This study compared the outcomes of two treatments for tendinous mallet finger: splinting and pinning. Researchers analyzed patient demographics, distal interphalangeal joint range of motion, clinical outcomes, and complication rates between the two groups. Methodology: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with tendinous mallet finger injury managed conservatively or surgically from 2018 to 2022 in a tertiary hospital. Result: Both surgical and conservative treatments were effective, as shown by the excellent total active motion scores and satisfactory qDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) outcomes in both groups. However, when comparing the Miller and Crawford criteria, the surgical group consistently showed slightly better functional outcomes. Conclusion: Both treatments yielded similar results for range of motion, extension lag, and flexion loss, making them equally effective. However, axial pinning may result in better subjective improvement and satisfaction. https://philjorthopaedics.org/index.php/pjo/article/view/10905tendinous mallet finger injuryaxial pinningmallet finger splinting |
| spellingShingle | Roel Gabriel Rabino Raymar Sibonga Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial Pinning Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics tendinous mallet finger injury axial pinning mallet finger splinting |
| title | Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial Pinning |
| title_full | Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial Pinning |
| title_fullStr | Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial Pinning |
| title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial Pinning |
| title_short | Outcomes of Patients with Tendinous Mallet Finger Injury Managed with DIPJ Extension Splinting vs Axial Pinning |
| title_sort | outcomes of patients with tendinous mallet finger injury managed with dipj extension splinting vs axial pinning |
| topic | tendinous mallet finger injury axial pinning mallet finger splinting |
| url | https://philjorthopaedics.org/index.php/pjo/article/view/10905 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT roelgabrielrabino outcomesofpatientswithtendinousmalletfingerinjurymanagedwithdipjextensionsplintingvsaxialpinning AT raymarsibonga outcomesofpatientswithtendinousmalletfingerinjurymanagedwithdipjextensionsplintingvsaxialpinning |