Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow

Abstract The decline of pelagophil minnows is related to river fragmentation across the southern Great Plains landscape. Because we know little about pelagophil movement patterns and timing, we aimed to quantify the movements of the vulnerable Arkansas River shiner (ARS) during the winter (November–...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Desiree M. Moore, Shannon K. Brewer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89500-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850208050367954944
author Desiree M. Moore
Shannon K. Brewer
author_facet Desiree M. Moore
Shannon K. Brewer
author_sort Desiree M. Moore
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The decline of pelagophil minnows is related to river fragmentation across the southern Great Plains landscape. Because we know little about pelagophil movement patterns and timing, we aimed to quantify the movements of the vulnerable Arkansas River shiner (ARS) during the winter (November–March) and prespawning (April–June) seasons. We tagged 4233 ARS using visible implant elastomer, passive integrated transponder, or p-Chip micro-transponder tags in 2018–2020. We sampled to recapture tagged fish weekly during the winter and biweekly during the spring. Tagged fish exhibited a downstream movement bias and movement was weakly related to increasing temperature, discharge, and photoperiod during winter, however most of the variability was explained by a random individual effect. Larger individuals moved greater distances than smaller fish. Upstream movements by a migratory portion of the population appeared to begin around late February based on the presence of fish at previously unoccupied sites. However, the first long-distance (30-km) upstream movement by a tagged fish was documented in late May. We show evidence that some ARS may be resident fish at sites throughout winter and spring of multiple years. To conserve freshwater pelagophil minnows, our results indicate water management strategies improving river connectivity in late winter through the spawning season may benefit spawning by migratory individuals, whereas lateral connectivity might benefit the resident portion of the population. Research efforts under experimental flows could provide insight to improved recovery options.
format Article
id doaj-art-99a4e18c73b840baa1dfcfd8f92640cf
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-99a4e18c73b840baa1dfcfd8f92640cf2025-08-20T02:10:19ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-03-0115111510.1038/s41598-025-89500-4Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnowDesiree M. Moore0Shannon K. Brewer1Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 007 Agriculture Hall, Oklahoma State UniversityU.S. Geological Survey, Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources Ecology and Management, 007 Agriculture Hall, Oklahoma State UniversityAbstract The decline of pelagophil minnows is related to river fragmentation across the southern Great Plains landscape. Because we know little about pelagophil movement patterns and timing, we aimed to quantify the movements of the vulnerable Arkansas River shiner (ARS) during the winter (November–March) and prespawning (April–June) seasons. We tagged 4233 ARS using visible implant elastomer, passive integrated transponder, or p-Chip micro-transponder tags in 2018–2020. We sampled to recapture tagged fish weekly during the winter and biweekly during the spring. Tagged fish exhibited a downstream movement bias and movement was weakly related to increasing temperature, discharge, and photoperiod during winter, however most of the variability was explained by a random individual effect. Larger individuals moved greater distances than smaller fish. Upstream movements by a migratory portion of the population appeared to begin around late February based on the presence of fish at previously unoccupied sites. However, the first long-distance (30-km) upstream movement by a tagged fish was documented in late May. We show evidence that some ARS may be resident fish at sites throughout winter and spring of multiple years. To conserve freshwater pelagophil minnows, our results indicate water management strategies improving river connectivity in late winter through the spawning season may benefit spawning by migratory individuals, whereas lateral connectivity might benefit the resident portion of the population. Research efforts under experimental flows could provide insight to improved recovery options.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89500-4
spellingShingle Desiree M. Moore
Shannon K. Brewer
Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow
Scientific Reports
title Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow
title_full Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow
title_fullStr Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow
title_full_unstemmed Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow
title_short Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow
title_sort overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89500-4
work_keys_str_mv AT desireemmoore overwinterandprespawningmovementsbyavulnerablefreshwaterpelagophilicminnow
AT shannonkbrewer overwinterandprespawningmovementsbyavulnerablefreshwaterpelagophilicminnow