Comparative Analysis of Systematic, Scoping, Umbrella, and Narrative Reviews in Clinical Research: Critical Considerations and Future Directions
Review studies play a key role in the development of clinical practice by synthesizing data and drawing conclusions from multiple scientific sources. In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of review studies conducted and published by researchers. In clinical research,...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Mohamad Motevalli |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Clinical Practice |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ijcp/9929300 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Systematic Reviews Comparing Direct and Indirect Restorations: An Umbrella Review That Examines Restoration Type and Confidence in Results
by: Mona Kimmel, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Critical thinking and clinical skills by problem-based learning educational methods: an umbrella systematic review
by: Wei-Li Ge, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Potentialities and critical issues of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: An umbrella review
by: Nicola Veronese, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Serious games in Science and Mathematics Education: a scoping umbrella review
by: Ayaz Karimov, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Clinical indications and future directions of carbon-ion
radiotherapy: a narrative review
by: Seo Hee Choi, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)