Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding Today

The Ottoman Empire, within the constraints of its own circumstances, made reasonable efforts to modernize the profession of “legal representative for the case” existing under the term “attorneyship for being party in the case/hearing” in Islamic Law. In this regard, the Regulation on Legal Represent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mustafa Okan Yağcı
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istanbul University Press 2024-08-01
Series:İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/31A1E7C2ABAC48D18803828415D880C9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849311719092912128
author Mustafa Okan Yağcı
author_facet Mustafa Okan Yağcı
author_sort Mustafa Okan Yağcı
collection DOAJ
description The Ottoman Empire, within the constraints of its own circumstances, made reasonable efforts to modernize the profession of “legal representative for the case” existing under the term “attorneyship for being party in the case/hearing” in Islamic Law. In this regard, the Regulation on Legal Representatives for the Case of Regulatory/Nizamiye Courts dated 1875, the first regulatory framework related to the legal profession, holds the status of being the foundational regulation for the profession of advocacy in the Turkish legal system. When the Turkish Republic era was reached, the prevailing view was that the profession of legal representative for the case was inadequate, and there was a need to create a new one. In this context, Attorney’s Act numbered 460 was enacted within the ongoing judicial reform efforts. The consensus that has been present since the Ottoman period on the fundamental solutions outlined in the Attorney’s Act has led to debates in the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye focusing more on secondary issues. These issues include the duration and form of the internship required to be eligible for the profession of attorneyship, whether graduation from a law school is a prerequisite for practicing as an attorney, and whether the terms “muhami/muhamat” which means “protector”, are suitable for the newly established profession. In this study, I will first examine the development of the attorneyship profession in the Ottoman Empire. Subsequently, I will discuss the regulations introduced by the Attorney’s Act and the debates held in the Parliament, drawing connections to today’s perspective.
format Article
id doaj-art-9966a5f53ee04af39d030a81b7e7c974
institution Kabale University
issn 2667-6974
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası
spelling doaj-art-9966a5f53ee04af39d030a81b7e7c9742025-08-20T03:53:18ZengIstanbul University Pressİstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası2667-69742024-08-0182264767010.26650/mecmua.2024.82.2.0009123456Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding TodayMustafa Okan Yağcı0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-3775Piri Reis Üniversitesi, Istanbul, TurkiyeThe Ottoman Empire, within the constraints of its own circumstances, made reasonable efforts to modernize the profession of “legal representative for the case” existing under the term “attorneyship for being party in the case/hearing” in Islamic Law. In this regard, the Regulation on Legal Representatives for the Case of Regulatory/Nizamiye Courts dated 1875, the first regulatory framework related to the legal profession, holds the status of being the foundational regulation for the profession of advocacy in the Turkish legal system. When the Turkish Republic era was reached, the prevailing view was that the profession of legal representative for the case was inadequate, and there was a need to create a new one. In this context, Attorney’s Act numbered 460 was enacted within the ongoing judicial reform efforts. The consensus that has been present since the Ottoman period on the fundamental solutions outlined in the Attorney’s Act has led to debates in the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye focusing more on secondary issues. These issues include the duration and form of the internship required to be eligible for the profession of attorneyship, whether graduation from a law school is a prerequisite for practicing as an attorney, and whether the terms “muhami/muhamat” which means “protector”, are suitable for the newly established profession. In this study, I will first examine the development of the attorneyship profession in the Ottoman Empire. Subsequently, I will discuss the regulations introduced by the Attorney’s Act and the debates held in the Parliament, drawing connections to today’s perspective.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/31A1E7C2ABAC48D18803828415D880C9the law of attorneyshipattorneyship professionlegal representative for the caselegal representationjudicial reforms i̇n türkiyeattorney’s act numbered 460regulation on legal representatives for the case of regulatory/nizamiye courts dated 1875
spellingShingle Mustafa Okan Yağcı
Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding Today
İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası
the law of attorneyship
attorneyship profession
legal representative for the case
legal representation
judicial reforms i̇n türkiye
attorney’s act numbered 460
regulation on legal representatives for the case of regulatory/nizamiye courts dated 1875
title Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding Today
title_full Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding Today
title_fullStr Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding Today
title_full_unstemmed Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding Today
title_short Transition to Modern Attorneyship Profession During the Republican Era, Discussions in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), and Criticisms Regarding Today
title_sort transition to modern attorneyship profession during the republican era discussions in the turkish grand national assembly tbmm and criticisms regarding today
topic the law of attorneyship
attorneyship profession
legal representative for the case
legal representation
judicial reforms i̇n türkiye
attorney’s act numbered 460
regulation on legal representatives for the case of regulatory/nizamiye courts dated 1875
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/31A1E7C2ABAC48D18803828415D880C9
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafaokanyagcı transitiontomodernattorneyshipprofessionduringtherepublicaneradiscussionsintheturkishgrandnationalassemblytbmmandcriticismsregardingtoday