Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based diets

BackgroundPet and animal feed store employees face numerous occupational health hazards, including exposure to pathogens from handling contaminated animal food products. This study aimed to (1) investigate knowledge, sanitation practices, and workplace policies related to handling animal food and tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Lord, Marie Cozzarelli, Sara Lyon, Sheri Pugh, Sharon R. Thompson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1523996/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850270510853652480
author Jennifer Lord
Marie Cozzarelli
Sara Lyon
Sara Lyon
Sheri Pugh
Sheri Pugh
Sharon R. Thompson
Sharon R. Thompson
author_facet Jennifer Lord
Marie Cozzarelli
Sara Lyon
Sara Lyon
Sheri Pugh
Sheri Pugh
Sharon R. Thompson
Sharon R. Thompson
author_sort Jennifer Lord
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPet and animal feed store employees face numerous occupational health hazards, including exposure to pathogens from handling contaminated animal food products. This study aimed to (1) investigate knowledge, sanitation practices, and workplace policies related to handling animal food and treats among employees of pet food and animal feed retailers in the United States (US) and (2) determine whether differences exist between employees of stores that sell raw pet food products and those that do not.MethodsA survey evaluating sanitation practices, training, and knowledge of disease risk related to animal husbandry and food handling was distributed to pet and animal feed store employees across the US by the University of Tennessee Center for Agriculture and Food Security and Preparedness (CAFSP), part of the Tennessee Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence. Pet and feed stores that were contacted for participation were identified by searching for stores that posted their email addresses online. Student workers and CAFSP contractors helped to identify pet and feed stores in their area and distribute surveys, which were disseminated via email, mail, and hand-delivery. Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess differences between employees of stores that sold raw pet food and those that did not.ResultsTwo hundred and six surveys were completed by employees of pet and animal feed stores in the 15 states, located in the Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, and Western US. Overall, just 25.3% (95% CI, 19.7, 31.7%) of respondents had received training on disease risk related to handling animal food. Compared to employees of stores that did not sell raw food, those who worked at raw food retailers had significantly higher perceived risk of illness (p = 0.0360). They tended to report more frequent surface disinfection (p = 0.0054), but not handwashing (p = 0.0542) than those who did not sell raw food. There were no significant differences in general workplace handwashing policies (p = 0.7800) or those specifically related to handling animal food (p = 0.0517). A substantial percentage of employees of both raw food retailers (41.5%) and those that did not sell raw food (67.8%) either rarely or never provided customers with food safety information.ConclusionFindings of this study indicate a need for ongoing training and outreach regarding food safety practices and zoonotic and foodborne disease risk among animal feed store employees. Stores should implement clear workplace hygiene policies and expand employee training and customer education to improve food safety standards and minimize disease risks.
format Article
id doaj-art-9956420567c248a59ce7277d3917d77e
institution OA Journals
issn 2297-1769
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj-art-9956420567c248a59ce7277d3917d77e2025-08-20T01:52:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692025-05-011210.3389/fvets.2025.15239961523996Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based dietsJennifer Lord0Marie Cozzarelli1Sara Lyon2Sara Lyon3Sheri Pugh4Sheri Pugh5Sharon R. Thompson6Sharon R. Thompson7Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Public Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Public Health, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United StatesGillings School of Public Health, Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United StatesCenter for Agriculture and Food Security and Preparedness, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United StatesTennessee Integrated Food Safety Center for Excellence, Nashville and Knoxville, TN, United StatesCenter for Agriculture and Food Security and Preparedness, Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United StatesTennessee Integrated Food Safety Center for Excellence, Nashville and Knoxville, TN, United StatesBackgroundPet and animal feed store employees face numerous occupational health hazards, including exposure to pathogens from handling contaminated animal food products. This study aimed to (1) investigate knowledge, sanitation practices, and workplace policies related to handling animal food and treats among employees of pet food and animal feed retailers in the United States (US) and (2) determine whether differences exist between employees of stores that sell raw pet food products and those that do not.MethodsA survey evaluating sanitation practices, training, and knowledge of disease risk related to animal husbandry and food handling was distributed to pet and animal feed store employees across the US by the University of Tennessee Center for Agriculture and Food Security and Preparedness (CAFSP), part of the Tennessee Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence. Pet and feed stores that were contacted for participation were identified by searching for stores that posted their email addresses online. Student workers and CAFSP contractors helped to identify pet and feed stores in their area and distribute surveys, which were disseminated via email, mail, and hand-delivery. Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess differences between employees of stores that sold raw pet food and those that did not.ResultsTwo hundred and six surveys were completed by employees of pet and animal feed stores in the 15 states, located in the Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, and Western US. Overall, just 25.3% (95% CI, 19.7, 31.7%) of respondents had received training on disease risk related to handling animal food. Compared to employees of stores that did not sell raw food, those who worked at raw food retailers had significantly higher perceived risk of illness (p = 0.0360). They tended to report more frequent surface disinfection (p = 0.0054), but not handwashing (p = 0.0542) than those who did not sell raw food. There were no significant differences in general workplace handwashing policies (p = 0.7800) or those specifically related to handling animal food (p = 0.0517). A substantial percentage of employees of both raw food retailers (41.5%) and those that did not sell raw food (67.8%) either rarely or never provided customers with food safety information.ConclusionFindings of this study indicate a need for ongoing training and outreach regarding food safety practices and zoonotic and foodborne disease risk among animal feed store employees. Stores should implement clear workplace hygiene policies and expand employee training and customer education to improve food safety standards and minimize disease risks.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1523996/fullzoonotic diseasefood safetyraw pet foodpublic healthpet storeanimal feed
spellingShingle Jennifer Lord
Marie Cozzarelli
Sara Lyon
Sara Lyon
Sheri Pugh
Sheri Pugh
Sharon R. Thompson
Sharon R. Thompson
Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based diets
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
zoonotic disease
food safety
raw pet food
public health
pet store
animal feed
title Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based diets
title_full Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based diets
title_fullStr Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based diets
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based diets
title_short Investigation of food safety perceptions, practices, and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat-based diets
title_sort investigation of food safety perceptions practices and workplace policies among employees of pet and animal feed stores that sell and do not sell raw meat based diets
topic zoonotic disease
food safety
raw pet food
public health
pet store
animal feed
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1523996/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferlord investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets
AT mariecozzarelli investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets
AT saralyon investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets
AT saralyon investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets
AT sheripugh investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets
AT sheripugh investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets
AT sharonrthompson investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets
AT sharonrthompson investigationoffoodsafetyperceptionspracticesandworkplacepoliciesamongemployeesofpetandanimalfeedstoresthatsellanddonotsellrawmeatbaseddiets