Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenarios

Developing forestry action plans with the goal of carbon neutrality is a critical task to identify carbon sink potential and balance the pathways of China's forests. Current research that predicts forest biomass carbon stock and sink potential has shortcomings, such as an incomplete assessment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui-Ling Tian, Jian-Hua Zhu, Xiang-Dong Lei, Xin-Yun Chen, Li-Xiong Zeng, Zun-Ji Jian, Fu-Hua Li, Wen-Fa Xiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2024-12-01
Series:Advances in Climate Change Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927824001539
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841528006364889088
author Hui-Ling Tian
Jian-Hua Zhu
Xiang-Dong Lei
Xin-Yun Chen
Li-Xiong Zeng
Zun-Ji Jian
Fu-Hua Li
Wen-Fa Xiao
author_facet Hui-Ling Tian
Jian-Hua Zhu
Xiang-Dong Lei
Xin-Yun Chen
Li-Xiong Zeng
Zun-Ji Jian
Fu-Hua Li
Wen-Fa Xiao
author_sort Hui-Ling Tian
collection DOAJ
description Developing forestry action plans with the goal of carbon neutrality is a critical task to identify carbon sink potential and balance the pathways of China's forests. Current research that predicts forest biomass carbon stock and sink potential has shortcomings, such as an incomplete assessment of China's forest carbon sink range, assumptions based on unchanged forest area in the base year and insufficient consideration of natural and human disturbance factors. This study utilised the national forest inventory (NFI) data to construct a model of forest growth and consumption using a machine learning algorithm (i.e. random forest), identified suitable areas for future forest expansion by integrating multi-source data, and set up three future forest management scenarios: business as usual (BAU), enhanced policy scenario (EPS) and maximum potential scenario (MPS). In addition, changes in the area, volume stock and biomass carbon stock in China's forests between 2020 and 2060 were predicted under three forestry activities (i.e. existing forest, afforested/reforested (AR) forest and forest conversion) and three climate scenarios (i.e. SSP126, SSP370 and SSP585) based on the 9th NFI (2014–2018). According to China's relevant planning goals and suitable forest space, the area of AR forests is predicted to be 55.55 × 106 hm2 by 2060, and the forest coverage rate is predicted to increase from 23% in 2018 to 28% by 2060. Biomass carbon sequestration (BCS) between 2020 and 2060 in AR forests is predicted to be 36.00 TgC per year. By 2060, the average BCS is predicted to be approximately 140.00–287.56 TgC per year in China's forests, which is mainly owing to arbor forest management. Under the BAU and EPS scenarios, BCS in China's forests is expected to decline from 2020 to 2060. However, under the MPS, BCS in China's forests is projected to increase and be maintained at 322 TgC per year or above by 2060, with wood production reaching 4.71 × 108 m3 per year. China's forests are predicted to experience an increase in biomass carbon stock in the future and play a role as a carbon sink. By taking measures to achieve the maximum growth potential of all forest types, China's forests will achieve a win‒win situation between carbon sinks and timber production.
format Article
id doaj-art-99405292cb324717ad038534fedff1d0
institution Kabale University
issn 1674-9278
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Advances in Climate Change Research
spelling doaj-art-99405292cb324717ad038534fedff1d02025-01-15T04:11:35ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Advances in Climate Change Research1674-92782024-12-0115611211129Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenariosHui-Ling Tian0Jian-Hua Zhu1Xiang-Dong Lei2Xin-Yun Chen3Li-Xiong Zeng4Zun-Ji Jian5Fu-Hua Li6Wen-Fa Xiao7Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China; Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaEcology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China; Corresponding author. Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, ChinaAcademy of Forest and Grassland Inventory and Planning of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100714, ChinaEcology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China; Academy of Forest and Grassland Inventory and Planning of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100714, ChinaEcology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, ChinaNational Nature Reserve Management Bureau of Beichuan Heyuan District, Datong 810100, ChinaAcademy of Forestry and Grassland Carbon Sink, Beijing 100091, China; Corresponding author.Developing forestry action plans with the goal of carbon neutrality is a critical task to identify carbon sink potential and balance the pathways of China's forests. Current research that predicts forest biomass carbon stock and sink potential has shortcomings, such as an incomplete assessment of China's forest carbon sink range, assumptions based on unchanged forest area in the base year and insufficient consideration of natural and human disturbance factors. This study utilised the national forest inventory (NFI) data to construct a model of forest growth and consumption using a machine learning algorithm (i.e. random forest), identified suitable areas for future forest expansion by integrating multi-source data, and set up three future forest management scenarios: business as usual (BAU), enhanced policy scenario (EPS) and maximum potential scenario (MPS). In addition, changes in the area, volume stock and biomass carbon stock in China's forests between 2020 and 2060 were predicted under three forestry activities (i.e. existing forest, afforested/reforested (AR) forest and forest conversion) and three climate scenarios (i.e. SSP126, SSP370 and SSP585) based on the 9th NFI (2014–2018). According to China's relevant planning goals and suitable forest space, the area of AR forests is predicted to be 55.55 × 106 hm2 by 2060, and the forest coverage rate is predicted to increase from 23% in 2018 to 28% by 2060. Biomass carbon sequestration (BCS) between 2020 and 2060 in AR forests is predicted to be 36.00 TgC per year. By 2060, the average BCS is predicted to be approximately 140.00–287.56 TgC per year in China's forests, which is mainly owing to arbor forest management. Under the BAU and EPS scenarios, BCS in China's forests is expected to decline from 2020 to 2060. However, under the MPS, BCS in China's forests is projected to increase and be maintained at 322 TgC per year or above by 2060, with wood production reaching 4.71 × 108 m3 per year. China's forests are predicted to experience an increase in biomass carbon stock in the future and play a role as a carbon sink. By taking measures to achieve the maximum growth potential of all forest types, China's forests will achieve a win‒win situation between carbon sinks and timber production.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927824001539National forest inventoryRandom forestForestry activityForest managementBiomass carbon sinkTimber production
spellingShingle Hui-Ling Tian
Jian-Hua Zhu
Xiang-Dong Lei
Xin-Yun Chen
Li-Xiong Zeng
Zun-Ji Jian
Fu-Hua Li
Wen-Fa Xiao
Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenarios
Advances in Climate Change Research
National forest inventory
Random forest
Forestry activity
Forest management
Biomass carbon sink
Timber production
title Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenarios
title_full Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenarios
title_fullStr Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenarios
title_short Timber and carbon sequestration potential of Chinese forests under different forest management scenarios
title_sort timber and carbon sequestration potential of chinese forests under different forest management scenarios
topic National forest inventory
Random forest
Forestry activity
Forest management
Biomass carbon sink
Timber production
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927824001539
work_keys_str_mv AT huilingtian timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios
AT jianhuazhu timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios
AT xiangdonglei timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios
AT xinyunchen timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios
AT lixiongzeng timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios
AT zunjijian timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios
AT fuhuali timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios
AT wenfaxiao timberandcarbonsequestrationpotentialofchineseforestsunderdifferentforestmanagementscenarios