A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata

Aims. To explore the risk factors for rebleeding in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients with high-risk stigmata after endoscopic hemostasis and to develop a new scoring system for them. Methods. A retrospective single-center study was conducted from January 2012 to June 2017....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhiyu Dong, Junwen Wang, Tingting Zhan, Haiqin Zhang, Lisha Yi, Shuchang Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5032657
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849404255985729536
author Zhiyu Dong
Junwen Wang
Tingting Zhan
Haiqin Zhang
Lisha Yi
Shuchang Xu
author_facet Zhiyu Dong
Junwen Wang
Tingting Zhan
Haiqin Zhang
Lisha Yi
Shuchang Xu
author_sort Zhiyu Dong
collection DOAJ
description Aims. To explore the risk factors for rebleeding in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients with high-risk stigmata after endoscopic hemostasis and to develop a new scoring system for them. Methods. A retrospective single-center study was conducted from January 2012 to June 2017. The logistic regression model was used to explore risk factors of poor clinical outcomes. Accuracy of new scoring systems was compared with Rockall score (RS) and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) using receiver operating characteristics curve. Results. Two hundred nine patients were included. In multivariate regression analysis, systolic blood pressure, endoscopic hemostasis method, hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine were identified as indicators for rebleeding. New scoring systems with 4 variables and 5 variables based on these 5 risk factors were chosen. The 4-variable scoring system outperformed GBS in predicting rebleeding while 5-variable scoring system outperformed RS and GBS in predicting rebleeding significantly. Score 2 was identified as the best cut-off of these 2 scoring systems. Conclusions. Systolic blood pressure, endoscopic hemostasis method, hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine were all associated with poor clinical outcomes. The new scoring systems had greater accuracy than RS and GBS in predicting rebleeding. Further external validation should be performed to verify the results.
format Article
id doaj-art-9934ac009de74cac935331d87a215145
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-9934ac009de74cac935331d87a2151452025-08-20T03:37:03ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2018-01-01201810.1155/2018/50326575032657A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk StigmataZhiyu Dong0Junwen Wang1Tingting Zhan2Haiqin Zhang3Lisha Yi4Shuchang Xu5Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaAims. To explore the risk factors for rebleeding in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients with high-risk stigmata after endoscopic hemostasis and to develop a new scoring system for them. Methods. A retrospective single-center study was conducted from January 2012 to June 2017. The logistic regression model was used to explore risk factors of poor clinical outcomes. Accuracy of new scoring systems was compared with Rockall score (RS) and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) using receiver operating characteristics curve. Results. Two hundred nine patients were included. In multivariate regression analysis, systolic blood pressure, endoscopic hemostasis method, hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine were identified as indicators for rebleeding. New scoring systems with 4 variables and 5 variables based on these 5 risk factors were chosen. The 4-variable scoring system outperformed GBS in predicting rebleeding while 5-variable scoring system outperformed RS and GBS in predicting rebleeding significantly. Score 2 was identified as the best cut-off of these 2 scoring systems. Conclusions. Systolic blood pressure, endoscopic hemostasis method, hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine were all associated with poor clinical outcomes. The new scoring systems had greater accuracy than RS and GBS in predicting rebleeding. Further external validation should be performed to verify the results.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5032657
spellingShingle Zhiyu Dong
Junwen Wang
Tingting Zhan
Haiqin Zhang
Lisha Yi
Shuchang Xu
A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata
title_full A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata
title_fullStr A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata
title_full_unstemmed A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata
title_short A New Scoring System to Predict Poor Clinical Outcomes in Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients with High-Risk Stigmata
title_sort new scoring system to predict poor clinical outcomes in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients with high risk stigmata
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5032657
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiyudong anewscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT junwenwang anewscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT tingtingzhan anewscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT haiqinzhang anewscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT lishayi anewscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT shuchangxu anewscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT zhiyudong newscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT junwenwang newscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT tingtingzhan newscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT haiqinzhang newscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT lishayi newscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata
AT shuchangxu newscoringsystemtopredictpoorclinicaloutcomesinacutenonvaricealuppergastrointestinalbleedingpatientswithhighriskstigmata