Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence
Abstract Animals often make decisions without perfect knowledge of environmental parameters like the quality of an encountered food patch or a potential mate. Theoreticians often assume animals make such decisions using a Bayesian updating process that combines prior information about the frequency...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-07-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11495 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850059717211062272 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas J. Valone |
| author_facet | Thomas J. Valone |
| author_sort | Thomas J. Valone |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Animals often make decisions without perfect knowledge of environmental parameters like the quality of an encountered food patch or a potential mate. Theoreticians often assume animals make such decisions using a Bayesian updating process that combines prior information about the frequency distribution of resources in the environment with sample information from an encountered resource; such a process leads to decisions that maximize fitness, given the available information. I examine three aspects of empirical work that shed light on the idea that animals can make such decisions in a Bayesian‐like manner. First, many animals are sensitive to variance differences in behavioral options, one metric used to characterize frequency distributions. Second, several species use information about the relative frequency of preferred versus nonpreferred items in different populations to make probabilistic inferences about samples taken from populations in a manner that results in maximizing the likelihood of obtaining a preferred reward. Third, the predictions of Bayesian models often match the behavior of individuals in two main approaches. One approach compares behavior to models that make different assumptions about how individuals estimate the quality of an environmental parameter. The patch exploitation behavior of nine species of birds and mammals has matched the predictions of Bayesian models. The other approach compares the behavior of individuals who learn, through experience, different frequency distributions of resources in their environment. The behavior of three bird species and bumblebees exploiting food patches and fruit flies selecting mates is influenced by their experience learning different frequency distributions of food and mates, respectively, in ways consistent with Bayesian models. These studies lend support to the idea that animals may combine prior and sample information in a Bayesian‐like manner to make decisions under uncertainty, but additional work on a greater diversity of species is required to better understand the generality of this ability. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-992edfac6b4c42a39369718ee5819d74 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2045-7758 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-07-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Evolution |
| spelling | doaj-art-992edfac6b4c42a39369718ee5819d742025-08-20T02:50:48ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-07-01147n/an/a10.1002/ece3.11495Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidenceThomas J. Valone0Department of Biology Saint Louis University Saint Louis Missouri USAAbstract Animals often make decisions without perfect knowledge of environmental parameters like the quality of an encountered food patch or a potential mate. Theoreticians often assume animals make such decisions using a Bayesian updating process that combines prior information about the frequency distribution of resources in the environment with sample information from an encountered resource; such a process leads to decisions that maximize fitness, given the available information. I examine three aspects of empirical work that shed light on the idea that animals can make such decisions in a Bayesian‐like manner. First, many animals are sensitive to variance differences in behavioral options, one metric used to characterize frequency distributions. Second, several species use information about the relative frequency of preferred versus nonpreferred items in different populations to make probabilistic inferences about samples taken from populations in a manner that results in maximizing the likelihood of obtaining a preferred reward. Third, the predictions of Bayesian models often match the behavior of individuals in two main approaches. One approach compares behavior to models that make different assumptions about how individuals estimate the quality of an environmental parameter. The patch exploitation behavior of nine species of birds and mammals has matched the predictions of Bayesian models. The other approach compares the behavior of individuals who learn, through experience, different frequency distributions of resources in their environment. The behavior of three bird species and bumblebees exploiting food patches and fruit flies selecting mates is influenced by their experience learning different frequency distributions of food and mates, respectively, in ways consistent with Bayesian models. These studies lend support to the idea that animals may combine prior and sample information in a Bayesian‐like manner to make decisions under uncertainty, but additional work on a greater diversity of species is required to better understand the generality of this ability.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11495Bayesian updatingcognitiondecision‐making under uncertaintypatch useprobability distribution |
| spellingShingle | Thomas J. Valone Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence Ecology and Evolution Bayesian updating cognition decision‐making under uncertainty patch use probability distribution |
| title | Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence |
| title_full | Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence |
| title_fullStr | Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence |
| title_short | Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals: Empirical evidence |
| title_sort | probabilistic inference and bayesian like estimation in animals empirical evidence |
| topic | Bayesian updating cognition decision‐making under uncertainty patch use probability distribution |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11495 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasjvalone probabilisticinferenceandbayesianlikeestimationinanimalsempiricalevidence |