PiCCO or Cardiac Ultrasound? Which Is Better for Hemodynamic Monitoring in ICU?
Advanced hemodynamic monitoring is fundamental in the management of the critically ill. Blood pressure and cardiac function are key markers of cardiovascular system function;, thus, having accurate measurements of these parameters in critically ill patients is essential. Currently, there are various...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Maria Andrei, Nicoleta Alice Dragoescu, Andreea Stanculescu, Luminita Chiutu, Octavian Dragoescu, Octavian Istratoaie |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Medicina |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/11/1884 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparative analysis of hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheter and transthoracic echocardiography in patients with cardiogenic shock
by: V. V. Ryabov, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management
by: Ryota Sato, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Hemodynamic Characteristics and Prognostic Implication of Modified Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Shock Classification in Comatose Patients With Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest
by: Louise Linde, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Comparison of different AI systems for diagnosing sepsis, septic shock, and cardiogenic shock: a retrospective study
by: Dirk Obmann, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
The golden ratio in the pulmonary circulation in patients with heart failure and cardiogenic shock
by: Hoong Sern Lim, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)