Reply to comments on “Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia – A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial”
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Pooja Bihani, Naveen Paliwal, Rishabh Jaju, Shivanand |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1159_24 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia – A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
by: Pooja Bihani, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Comment On ‘Comparative analysis of LMA Blockbuster® clinical performance: Blind versus Miller laryngoscope-guided insertion in paediatric general anaesthesia – A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial’
by: Mamta Rana, et al. -
Paediatric Anaesthesia /
by: Davenport,Harold T.
Published: (1982) -
Thoracic spinal anaesthesia – An effective alternative to general anaesthesia in breast surgeries: A randomised, non-blinded study
by: G. S. Karthik, et al. -
Thoracic spinal anaesthesia – An effective alternative to general anaesthesia in breast surgeries: A randomised, non-blinded study
by: G S Karthik, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01)