Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?

MOOCs generally integrate various resources likely to promote learning. This is particularly the case for communication tools that support exchanges between learners. In this contribution, we compare how learners from two contrasting groups in terms of enrolment modalities (spontaneous vs. enrolled)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karim Boumazguida, Gaëtan Temperman, Antoine Derobertmasure, Bruno De Lièvre
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire 2022-12-01
Series:Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/4278
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841546595131195392
author Karim Boumazguida
Gaëtan Temperman
Antoine Derobertmasure
Bruno De Lièvre
author_facet Karim Boumazguida
Gaëtan Temperman
Antoine Derobertmasure
Bruno De Lièvre
author_sort Karim Boumazguida
collection DOAJ
description MOOCs generally integrate various resources likely to promote learning. This is particularly the case for communication tools that support exchanges between learners. In this contribution, we compare how learners from two contrasting groups in terms of enrolment modalities (spontaneous vs. enrolled) in the MOOC use two different types of communication tools (Forum vs. Facebook group). Our results show that the forum was used more by spontaneous learners than by enrolled learners. The latter preferred a social medium, Facebook. Most messages published on the forum by participants in both groups relate to the coordination of the MOOC, requests for help or clarification, and the sharing of personal information unrelated to the course. The participants publish more massively on the Facebook group messages related to its coordination, of a phatic nature [thanks, humour, greeting] and requests for help. Compared to the forum, the types of messages published by the subjects of the Facebook group differ according to the group to which they belong. Regardless of the communication tool used, we can see that the number of messages published by learners in both groups decreased as the MOOC continued. Finally, the comparison of the participants’ declarations regarding their actual use of the communication tools shows, despite some disparities, an overall adequacy between declared practices and actual use.
format Article
id doaj-art-9892683985fe4e679bf1d9f15a37be53
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-8427
language fra
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire
record_format Article
series Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur
spelling doaj-art-9892683985fe4e679bf1d9f15a37be532025-01-10T16:18:35ZfraAssociation Internationale de Pédagogie UniversitaireRevue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur2076-84272022-12-013810.4000/ripes.4278Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?Karim BoumazguidaGaëtan TempermanAntoine DerobertmasureBruno De LièvreMOOCs generally integrate various resources likely to promote learning. This is particularly the case for communication tools that support exchanges between learners. In this contribution, we compare how learners from two contrasting groups in terms of enrolment modalities (spontaneous vs. enrolled) in the MOOC use two different types of communication tools (Forum vs. Facebook group). Our results show that the forum was used more by spontaneous learners than by enrolled learners. The latter preferred a social medium, Facebook. Most messages published on the forum by participants in both groups relate to the coordination of the MOOC, requests for help or clarification, and the sharing of personal information unrelated to the course. The participants publish more massively on the Facebook group messages related to its coordination, of a phatic nature [thanks, humour, greeting] and requests for help. Compared to the forum, the types of messages published by the subjects of the Facebook group differ according to the group to which they belong. Regardless of the communication tool used, we can see that the number of messages published by learners in both groups decreased as the MOOC continued. Finally, the comparison of the participants’ declarations regarding their actual use of the communication tools shows, despite some disparities, an overall adequacy between declared practices and actual use.https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/4278pédagogie universitairecommunicationMOOCactualité pédagogiqueFacebook
spellingShingle Karim Boumazguida
Gaëtan Temperman
Antoine Derobertmasure
Bruno De Lièvre
Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?
Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur
pédagogie universitaire
communication
MOOC
actualité pédagogique
Facebook
title Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?
title_full Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?
title_fullStr Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?
title_full_unstemmed Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?
title_short Quels usages des outils de communication dans un MOOC selon les profils des participants ?
title_sort quels usages des outils de communication dans un mooc selon les profils des participants
topic pédagogie universitaire
communication
MOOC
actualité pédagogique
Facebook
url https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/4278
work_keys_str_mv AT karimboumazguida quelsusagesdesoutilsdecommunicationdansunmoocselonlesprofilsdesparticipants
AT gaetantemperman quelsusagesdesoutilsdecommunicationdansunmoocselonlesprofilsdesparticipants
AT antoinederobertmasure quelsusagesdesoutilsdecommunicationdansunmoocselonlesprofilsdesparticipants
AT brunodelievre quelsusagesdesoutilsdecommunicationdansunmoocselonlesprofilsdesparticipants