BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSIS

Aim of the study: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various bone reconstruction techniques for preparing the prosthetic field for dental implants. Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and 2024 was conducted. Databases...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ioana Dobrovat, Tibeica Andreea, Haddad Clara Diana, Adam Eduard, Agop-Forna Doriana, Norina Forna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Romanian Dental Association for Education 2024-06-01
Series:Romanian Journal of Medical and Dental Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.adre.ro/bone-reconstruction-techniques-for-dental-implant-prosthetic-fields-a-meta-analysis/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554952562933760
author Ioana Dobrovat
Tibeica Andreea
Haddad Clara Diana
Adam Eduard
Agop-Forna Doriana
Norina Forna
author_facet Ioana Dobrovat
Tibeica Andreea
Haddad Clara Diana
Adam Eduard
Agop-Forna Doriana
Norina Forna
author_sort Ioana Dobrovat
collection DOAJ
description Aim of the study: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various bone reconstruction techniques for preparing the prosthetic field for dental implants. Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and 2024 was conducted. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Studies were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were extracted and analyzed using standard meta-analytic techniques. Results: The meta-analysis included 15 studies, with a total of 1,200 patients. The results indicated that autogenous bone grafts provided the highest implant success rates and long-term bone stability compared to allografts and synthetic materials. Complications were more common with allografts and synthetic materials. Conclusions: Autogenous bone grafts are recommended for optimal outcomes in dental implant procedures, although allografts and synthetic materials remain viable alternatives in specific clinical scenarios.
format Article
id doaj-art-9868b8a866f9494687cfd238c2a377e3
institution Kabale University
issn 2393-1531
2393-1108
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Romanian Dental Association for Education
record_format Article
series Romanian Journal of Medical and Dental Education
spelling doaj-art-9868b8a866f9494687cfd238c2a377e32025-01-08T07:45:59ZengRomanian Dental Association for EducationRomanian Journal of Medical and Dental Education2393-15312393-11082024-06-01133610BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSISIoana Dobrovat0Tibeica Andreea1Haddad Clara Diana2Adam Eduard3Agop-Forna Doriana4Norina Forna5“Gr. T. Popa" U.M.Ph. - Iași, Romania, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Proshodontics“Gr. T. Popa" U.M.Ph. - Iași, Romania, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of ProshodonticsGr. T. Popa" U.M.Ph. - Iași, Romania ,PhD studentGr. T. Popa" U.M.Ph. - Iași, Romania ,PhD student“Gr. T. Popa" U.M.Ph. - Iași, Romania, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Surgery“Gr. T. Popa" U.M.Ph. - Iași, Romania, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of ProshodonticsAim of the study: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various bone reconstruction techniques for preparing the prosthetic field for dental implants. Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and 2024 was conducted. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Studies were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were extracted and analyzed using standard meta-analytic techniques. Results: The meta-analysis included 15 studies, with a total of 1,200 patients. The results indicated that autogenous bone grafts provided the highest implant success rates and long-term bone stability compared to allografts and synthetic materials. Complications were more common with allografts and synthetic materials. Conclusions: Autogenous bone grafts are recommended for optimal outcomes in dental implant procedures, although allografts and synthetic materials remain viable alternatives in specific clinical scenarios.https://journal.adre.ro/bone-reconstruction-techniques-for-dental-implant-prosthetic-fields-a-meta-analysis/bone reconstructiondental implantsautograftallograftsynthetic bone substitutes
spellingShingle Ioana Dobrovat
Tibeica Andreea
Haddad Clara Diana
Adam Eduard
Agop-Forna Doriana
Norina Forna
BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSIS
Romanian Journal of Medical and Dental Education
bone reconstruction
dental implants
autograft
allograft
synthetic bone substitutes
title BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSIS
title_full BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSIS
title_fullStr BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSIS
title_short BONE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR DENTAL IMPLANT PROSTHETIC FIELDS: A META-ANALYSIS
title_sort bone reconstruction techniques for dental implant prosthetic fields a meta analysis
topic bone reconstruction
dental implants
autograft
allograft
synthetic bone substitutes
url https://journal.adre.ro/bone-reconstruction-techniques-for-dental-implant-prosthetic-fields-a-meta-analysis/
work_keys_str_mv AT ioanadobrovat bonereconstructiontechniquesfordentalimplantprostheticfieldsametaanalysis
AT tibeicaandreea bonereconstructiontechniquesfordentalimplantprostheticfieldsametaanalysis
AT haddadclaradiana bonereconstructiontechniquesfordentalimplantprostheticfieldsametaanalysis
AT adameduard bonereconstructiontechniquesfordentalimplantprostheticfieldsametaanalysis
AT agopfornadoriana bonereconstructiontechniquesfordentalimplantprostheticfieldsametaanalysis
AT norinaforna bonereconstructiontechniquesfordentalimplantprostheticfieldsametaanalysis