Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover session

BackgroundIn long tennis matches, the number of unforced errors in groundstrokes increases. However, players need to maintain their successful strokes consistently in order to be successful in matches. To overcome this situation, tennis players utilize certain ergogenic supplements. In order to dete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mekki Abdioglu, Ahmet Mor, Dan Iulian Alexe, Raul Marian Todor, Elena Adelina Panaet, Cristina Ioana Alexe, Firat Akca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1608893/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849718245124210688
author Mekki Abdioglu
Ahmet Mor
Dan Iulian Alexe
Raul Marian Todor
Elena Adelina Panaet
Cristina Ioana Alexe
Firat Akca
author_facet Mekki Abdioglu
Ahmet Mor
Dan Iulian Alexe
Raul Marian Todor
Elena Adelina Panaet
Cristina Ioana Alexe
Firat Akca
author_sort Mekki Abdioglu
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIn long tennis matches, the number of unforced errors in groundstrokes increases. However, players need to maintain their successful strokes consistently in order to be successful in matches. To overcome this situation, tennis players utilize certain ergogenic supplements. In order to determine the most effective ergogenic supplement on players’ performance, it is aimed to investigate the effects of caffeinated chewing gum (CAFGUM), carbohydrate gel (CHOGEL) and cho gel + cafe gum (CHOGEL + CAFGUM) on tennis players’ basic strokes, countermovement jumps (CMJ), heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and gastrointestinal discomfort in a training session.MethodThe study included 14 male tennis players (mean age: 15.93 ± 0.83 years, height: 173.86 ± 6.89 cm, and body mass: 60.64 ± 2.58 kg) with experience in national and international tournaments. Players ingested CHOGEL (21.1 g) + CAFGUM (100 mg) or CHOGEL (21.1 g) + gum placebo (PLAGUM) or CAFGUM (100 mg) or PLAGUM before a high-intensity workout and at the end of each set.ResultsThe CHOGEL + CAFGUM session performed better groundstrokes than the control (CON) (p = 0.001) and the PLAGUM sessions (p = 0.001). When total RPE values were considered in the training session, the CHOGEL + CAFGUM session had lower RPE scores than the CON (p = 0.010) and PLAGUM (p = 0.044) sessions. The CHOGEL + PLAGUM session had significantly lower RPE scores than the CON (p = 0.005) and PLAGUM (p = 0.005) sessions. The CAFGUM session had significantly lower RPE scores than the CON (p = 0.013). It was observed that no supplements significantly affected either HR (p = 0.188) or CMJ (p = 0.349) scores.ConclusionsIn conclusion, there was a significant difference on basic strokes and RPE scores between CHOGEL + CAFGUM supplementation used before and during training compared with the control session. At the same time, there was no significant performance outcomes between CHOGEL and CAFGUM sessions.
format Article
id doaj-art-9861fb73768b4ddfa74a31f3c07214b7
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-861X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Nutrition
spelling doaj-art-9861fb73768b4ddfa74a31f3c07214b72025-08-20T03:12:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2025-07-011210.3389/fnut.2025.16088931608893Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover sessionMekki Abdioglu0Ahmet Mor1Dan Iulian Alexe2Raul Marian Todor3Elena Adelina Panaet4Cristina Ioana Alexe5Firat Akca6Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, TürkiyeDepartment of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sinop University, Sinop, TürkiyeDepartment of Physical and Occupational Therapy, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacau, Bacău, RomaniaDepartment of Environmental Science, Physics, Physical Education and Sport, ”Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Sibiu, RomaniaDepartment of Physical and Occupational Therapy, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacau, Bacău, RomaniaDepartment of Physical Education and Sports Performance, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacău, Bacău, RomaniaDepartment of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, TürkiyeBackgroundIn long tennis matches, the number of unforced errors in groundstrokes increases. However, players need to maintain their successful strokes consistently in order to be successful in matches. To overcome this situation, tennis players utilize certain ergogenic supplements. In order to determine the most effective ergogenic supplement on players’ performance, it is aimed to investigate the effects of caffeinated chewing gum (CAFGUM), carbohydrate gel (CHOGEL) and cho gel + cafe gum (CHOGEL + CAFGUM) on tennis players’ basic strokes, countermovement jumps (CMJ), heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and gastrointestinal discomfort in a training session.MethodThe study included 14 male tennis players (mean age: 15.93 ± 0.83 years, height: 173.86 ± 6.89 cm, and body mass: 60.64 ± 2.58 kg) with experience in national and international tournaments. Players ingested CHOGEL (21.1 g) + CAFGUM (100 mg) or CHOGEL (21.1 g) + gum placebo (PLAGUM) or CAFGUM (100 mg) or PLAGUM before a high-intensity workout and at the end of each set.ResultsThe CHOGEL + CAFGUM session performed better groundstrokes than the control (CON) (p = 0.001) and the PLAGUM sessions (p = 0.001). When total RPE values were considered in the training session, the CHOGEL + CAFGUM session had lower RPE scores than the CON (p = 0.010) and PLAGUM (p = 0.044) sessions. The CHOGEL + PLAGUM session had significantly lower RPE scores than the CON (p = 0.005) and PLAGUM (p = 0.005) sessions. The CAFGUM session had significantly lower RPE scores than the CON (p = 0.013). It was observed that no supplements significantly affected either HR (p = 0.188) or CMJ (p = 0.349) scores.ConclusionsIn conclusion, there was a significant difference on basic strokes and RPE scores between CHOGEL + CAFGUM supplementation used before and during training compared with the control session. At the same time, there was no significant performance outcomes between CHOGEL and CAFGUM sessions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1608893/fullgroundstrokesergogenic aidstennisperformancetraining
spellingShingle Mekki Abdioglu
Ahmet Mor
Dan Iulian Alexe
Raul Marian Todor
Elena Adelina Panaet
Cristina Ioana Alexe
Firat Akca
Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover session
Frontiers in Nutrition
groundstrokes
ergogenic aids
tennis
performance
training
title Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover session
title_full Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover session
title_fullStr Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover session
title_full_unstemmed Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover session
title_short Effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance: single-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover session
title_sort effects of isolated or combined carbohydrate and caffeine supplementation on tennis training performance single blind randomized placebo controlled crossover session
topic groundstrokes
ergogenic aids
tennis
performance
training
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1608893/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mekkiabdioglu effectsofisolatedorcombinedcarbohydrateandcaffeinesupplementationontennistrainingperformancesingleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoversession
AT ahmetmor effectsofisolatedorcombinedcarbohydrateandcaffeinesupplementationontennistrainingperformancesingleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoversession
AT daniulianalexe effectsofisolatedorcombinedcarbohydrateandcaffeinesupplementationontennistrainingperformancesingleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoversession
AT raulmariantodor effectsofisolatedorcombinedcarbohydrateandcaffeinesupplementationontennistrainingperformancesingleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoversession
AT elenaadelinapanaet effectsofisolatedorcombinedcarbohydrateandcaffeinesupplementationontennistrainingperformancesingleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoversession
AT cristinaioanaalexe effectsofisolatedorcombinedcarbohydrateandcaffeinesupplementationontennistrainingperformancesingleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoversession
AT firatakca effectsofisolatedorcombinedcarbohydrateandcaffeinesupplementationontennistrainingperformancesingleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoversession