Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review

**Background:** Congenital heart disease is the most common congenital condition worldwide, with a prevalence of 80 cases per 10 000 live births. In addition to perinatal morbidity and mortality, it entails long-term consequences such as multiple surgeries, prolonged hospitalizations, lifelong cardi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darío Londoño Trujillo, Paula A. Castro García, Kristian K. Rojas López, Karen J. Moreno-Medina, María T. Dominguez Torres, Rodolfo J. Dennis Verano, Nestor F. Sandoval Reyes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2024-05-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.116147
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860296870002688
author Darío Londoño Trujillo
Paula A. Castro García
Kristian K. Rojas López
Karen J. Moreno-Medina
María T. Dominguez Torres
Rodolfo J. Dennis Verano
Nestor F. Sandoval Reyes
author_facet Darío Londoño Trujillo
Paula A. Castro García
Kristian K. Rojas López
Karen J. Moreno-Medina
María T. Dominguez Torres
Rodolfo J. Dennis Verano
Nestor F. Sandoval Reyes
author_sort Darío Londoño Trujillo
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Congenital heart disease is the most common congenital condition worldwide, with a prevalence of 80 cases per 10 000 live births. In addition to perinatal morbidity and mortality, it entails long-term consequences such as multiple surgeries, prolonged hospitalizations, lifelong cardiac follow-up, reduced quality of life, risk of heart failure, and premature mortality in adulthood. This significant health and economic burden on healthcare systems and families highlights the relevance of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of methods for early detection of this condition. **Objective:** To conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify and analyze existing economic evaluations on prenatal detection of congenital heart diseases through ultrasound, focusing on the reported cost-effectiveness results and the methodological quality of the evaluated studies according to established criteria. **Methods:** An SLR of economic evaluations was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A quantitative synthesis of key methodological components of each economic evaluation was performed. The incremental medical costs, effectiveness measures, and cost-effectiveness ratios reported in each study were compiled and compared. The methodological quality was assessed according to compliance with the 24 CHEERS criteria. **Results:** We found 785 articles, of which only 7 met all inclusion criteria. Most were cost-effectiveness analyses, with the most common outcome being number of cases detected. Screening with only 4-chamber views interpreted by general practitioners or cardiologists were dominant strategies compared with screening with 4-chamber plus outflow views interpreted by a general practitioner. Fetal echocardiography was most effective but most expensive. Screening with 4-chamber and outflow view, followed by referral to a specialist, were recommended as the least expensive strategy per defect detected. On average, articles met 17 of the 24 CHEERS criteria. **Discussion:** While recent cost-effectiveness analyses demonstrated improved methodological quality, there was a lack of homogeneity due to differences in comparators and population subgroups analyzed. Despite this heterogeneity, fetal ultrasonography screening was consistently identified as a cost-effective strategy, with its cost-effectiveness heavily influenced by the expertise of the interpreting physician. **Conclusion:** Most studies recommend implementing obstetric ultrasonography screening, without routine fetal echocardiography, for detecting congenital heart diseases.
format Article
id doaj-art-985e046b8a5d4c469a5a7f83b3719148
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-985e046b8a5d4c469a5a7f83b37191482025-02-10T16:13:20ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362024-05-01111Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature ReviewDarío Londoño TrujilloPaula A. Castro GarcíaKristian K. Rojas LópezKaren J. Moreno-MedinaMaría T. Dominguez TorresRodolfo J. Dennis VeranoNestor F. Sandoval Reyes**Background:** Congenital heart disease is the most common congenital condition worldwide, with a prevalence of 80 cases per 10 000 live births. In addition to perinatal morbidity and mortality, it entails long-term consequences such as multiple surgeries, prolonged hospitalizations, lifelong cardiac follow-up, reduced quality of life, risk of heart failure, and premature mortality in adulthood. This significant health and economic burden on healthcare systems and families highlights the relevance of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of methods for early detection of this condition. **Objective:** To conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify and analyze existing economic evaluations on prenatal detection of congenital heart diseases through ultrasound, focusing on the reported cost-effectiveness results and the methodological quality of the evaluated studies according to established criteria. **Methods:** An SLR of economic evaluations was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A quantitative synthesis of key methodological components of each economic evaluation was performed. The incremental medical costs, effectiveness measures, and cost-effectiveness ratios reported in each study were compiled and compared. The methodological quality was assessed according to compliance with the 24 CHEERS criteria. **Results:** We found 785 articles, of which only 7 met all inclusion criteria. Most were cost-effectiveness analyses, with the most common outcome being number of cases detected. Screening with only 4-chamber views interpreted by general practitioners or cardiologists were dominant strategies compared with screening with 4-chamber plus outflow views interpreted by a general practitioner. Fetal echocardiography was most effective but most expensive. Screening with 4-chamber and outflow view, followed by referral to a specialist, were recommended as the least expensive strategy per defect detected. On average, articles met 17 of the 24 CHEERS criteria. **Discussion:** While recent cost-effectiveness analyses demonstrated improved methodological quality, there was a lack of homogeneity due to differences in comparators and population subgroups analyzed. Despite this heterogeneity, fetal ultrasonography screening was consistently identified as a cost-effective strategy, with its cost-effectiveness heavily influenced by the expertise of the interpreting physician. **Conclusion:** Most studies recommend implementing obstetric ultrasonography screening, without routine fetal echocardiography, for detecting congenital heart diseases.https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.116147
spellingShingle Darío Londoño Trujillo
Paula A. Castro García
Kristian K. Rojas López
Karen J. Moreno-Medina
María T. Dominguez Torres
Rodolfo J. Dennis Verano
Nestor F. Sandoval Reyes
Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of the Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort cost effectiveness of the prenatal detection of congenital heart diseases a systematic literature review
url https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.116147
work_keys_str_mv AT dariolondonotrujillo costeffectivenessoftheprenataldetectionofcongenitalheartdiseasesasystematicliteraturereview
AT paulaacastrogarcia costeffectivenessoftheprenataldetectionofcongenitalheartdiseasesasystematicliteraturereview
AT kristiankrojaslopez costeffectivenessoftheprenataldetectionofcongenitalheartdiseasesasystematicliteraturereview
AT karenjmorenomedina costeffectivenessoftheprenataldetectionofcongenitalheartdiseasesasystematicliteraturereview
AT mariatdomingueztorres costeffectivenessoftheprenataldetectionofcongenitalheartdiseasesasystematicliteraturereview
AT rodolfojdennisverano costeffectivenessoftheprenataldetectionofcongenitalheartdiseasesasystematicliteraturereview
AT nestorfsandovalreyes costeffectivenessoftheprenataldetectionofcongenitalheartdiseasesasystematicliteraturereview