Implication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate Redshift

Powerful galactic outflows driven by active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are commonly considered as one of the main mechanisms to regulate star formation in massive galaxies. Ultra- and hyperluminous IR galaxies (U/HyLIRGs) are thought to represent a transition phase of galaxies from a rapidly growing per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoyang Chen, Masayuki Akiyama, Kohei Ichikawa, Yoshiki Toba, Toshihiro Kawaguchi, Takuma Izumi, Toshiki Saito, Daisuke Iono, Masatoshi Imanishi, Kianhong Lee, Hiroshi Nagai, Hirofumi Noda, Abdurro’uf, Mitsuru Kokubo, Naoki Matsumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad93ab
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527694379974656
author Xiaoyang Chen
Masayuki Akiyama
Kohei Ichikawa
Yoshiki Toba
Toshihiro Kawaguchi
Takuma Izumi
Toshiki Saito
Daisuke Iono
Masatoshi Imanishi
Kianhong Lee
Hiroshi Nagai
Hirofumi Noda
Abdurro’uf
Mitsuru Kokubo
Naoki Matsumoto
author_facet Xiaoyang Chen
Masayuki Akiyama
Kohei Ichikawa
Yoshiki Toba
Toshihiro Kawaguchi
Takuma Izumi
Toshiki Saito
Daisuke Iono
Masatoshi Imanishi
Kianhong Lee
Hiroshi Nagai
Hirofumi Noda
Abdurro’uf
Mitsuru Kokubo
Naoki Matsumoto
author_sort Xiaoyang Chen
collection DOAJ
description Powerful galactic outflows driven by active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are commonly considered as one of the main mechanisms to regulate star formation in massive galaxies. Ultra- and hyperluminous IR galaxies (U/HyLIRGs) are thought to represent a transition phase of galaxies from a rapidly growing period to a quiescent status as gas is swept out by outflows, providing a laboratory in which to investigate outflows and their feedback effects on hosts. In this paper we report recent Gemini and Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of a HyLIRG, J1126, at z = 0.46842, which has been identified with a puzzling coexistence of a fast ionized outflow (>2000 km s ^−1 ) and an intense starburst (star formation rate of 800 M _⊙ yr ^−1 ). The Gemini observation shows the fast ionized outflow is extended to several kiloparsecs with a mass-loss rate of 180 M _⊙ yr ^−1 . A massive molecular outflow with a high mass-loss rate (2500 M _⊙ yr ^−1 ) is revealed by ALMA. The multiphase outflows show large factors of momentum boost and loading of kinetic power, indicating a driving by the thermal pressure of a nuclear hot wind and/or the radiation pressure of a highly obscured AGN. In addition to ejection of kinetic energy, it is also found that the powerful outflow can induce an ionizing shock in the galaxy disk and enhance the excitation and dissociation of molecular gas. The powerful outflow probably results in an instantaneous negative feedback and shows potential to regulate host growth in the long term.
format Article
id doaj-art-98412dddfa5f441f91c41177599e4580
institution Kabale University
issn 1538-4357
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj-art-98412dddfa5f441f91c41177599e45802025-01-15T08:16:50ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572025-01-0197913210.3847/1538-4357/ad93abImplication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate RedshiftXiaoyang Chen0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-473XMasayuki Akiyama1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2651-1701Kohei Ichikawa2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4377-903XYoshiki Toba3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-7863Toshihiro Kawaguchi4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3866-9645Takuma Izumi5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9452-0813Toshiki Saito6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-9328Daisuke Iono7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-0823Masatoshi Imanishi8https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-8792Kianhong Lee9https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-0101Hiroshi Nagai10https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0292-3645Hirofumi Noda11https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6020-517XAbdurro’uf12https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-8761Mitsuru Kokubo13https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6402-1415Naoki Matsumoto14https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8299-0006National Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jpAstronomical Institute, Tohoku University , 6-3 Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, JapanFaculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University , 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8050, JapanNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jp; Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics , 11F of Astronomy-Mathematics Building, AS/NTU, No. 1, Section 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; Research Center for Space and Cosmic Evolution, Ehime University , 2-5 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, JapanDepartment of Economics, Management and Information Science, Onomichi City University , Hisayamada 1600-2, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-8506, JapanNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jpDepartment of Global Interdisciplinary Science and Innovation, Shizuoka University , 836 Ohya, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka-Shi 422-8529, JapanNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jpNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jpNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jp; Astronomical Institute, Tohoku University , 6-3 Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, JapanNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jpAstronomical Institute, Tohoku University , 6-3 Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, JapanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University , 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USANational Astronomical Observatory of Japan , 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan ; xiaoyang.chen@nao.ac.jpAstronomical Institute, Tohoku University , 6-3 Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, JapanPowerful galactic outflows driven by active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are commonly considered as one of the main mechanisms to regulate star formation in massive galaxies. Ultra- and hyperluminous IR galaxies (U/HyLIRGs) are thought to represent a transition phase of galaxies from a rapidly growing period to a quiescent status as gas is swept out by outflows, providing a laboratory in which to investigate outflows and their feedback effects on hosts. In this paper we report recent Gemini and Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of a HyLIRG, J1126, at z = 0.46842, which has been identified with a puzzling coexistence of a fast ionized outflow (>2000 km s ^−1 ) and an intense starburst (star formation rate of 800 M _⊙ yr ^−1 ). The Gemini observation shows the fast ionized outflow is extended to several kiloparsecs with a mass-loss rate of 180 M _⊙ yr ^−1 . A massive molecular outflow with a high mass-loss rate (2500 M _⊙ yr ^−1 ) is revealed by ALMA. The multiphase outflows show large factors of momentum boost and loading of kinetic power, indicating a driving by the thermal pressure of a nuclear hot wind and/or the radiation pressure of a highly obscured AGN. In addition to ejection of kinetic energy, it is also found that the powerful outflow can induce an ionizing shock in the galaxy disk and enhance the excitation and dissociation of molecular gas. The powerful outflow probably results in an instantaneous negative feedback and shows potential to regulate host growth in the long term.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad93abActive galactic nucleiUltraluminous infrared galaxiesGalaxy windsGalaxy quenching
spellingShingle Xiaoyang Chen
Masayuki Akiyama
Kohei Ichikawa
Yoshiki Toba
Toshihiro Kawaguchi
Takuma Izumi
Toshiki Saito
Daisuke Iono
Masatoshi Imanishi
Kianhong Lee
Hiroshi Nagai
Hirofumi Noda
Abdurro’uf
Mitsuru Kokubo
Naoki Matsumoto
Implication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate Redshift
The Astrophysical Journal
Active galactic nuclei
Ultraluminous infrared galaxies
Galaxy winds
Galaxy quenching
title Implication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate Redshift
title_full Implication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate Redshift
title_fullStr Implication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate Redshift
title_full_unstemmed Implication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate Redshift
title_short Implication of Galaxy-scale Negative Feedback by One of the Most Powerful Multiphase Outflows in a Hyperluminous Infrared Galaxy at Intermediate Redshift
title_sort implication of galaxy scale negative feedback by one of the most powerful multiphase outflows in a hyperluminous infrared galaxy at intermediate redshift
topic Active galactic nuclei
Ultraluminous infrared galaxies
Galaxy winds
Galaxy quenching
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad93ab
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyangchen implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT masayukiakiyama implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT koheiichikawa implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT yoshikitoba implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT toshihirokawaguchi implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT takumaizumi implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT toshikisaito implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT daisukeiono implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT masatoshiimanishi implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT kianhonglee implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT hiroshinagai implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT hirofuminoda implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT abdurrouf implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT mitsurukokubo implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift
AT naokimatsumoto implicationofgalaxyscalenegativefeedbackbyoneofthemostpowerfulmultiphaseoutflowsinahyperluminousinfraredgalaxyatintermediateredshift