Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRF

The determination of silicon (Si), total uranium (U) and impurities in uranium-silicide (U3Si2) samples by wavelength dispersion X-ray fluorescence technique (WDXRF) has been already validated and is currently implemented at IPEN’s X-Ray Fluorescence Laboratory (IPEN-CNEN/SP) in São Paulo, Brazil. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcos Antonio Scapin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Radiation Protection Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, SBPR) 2019-02-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/582
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849317830673039360
author Marcos Antonio Scapin
author_facet Marcos Antonio Scapin
author_sort Marcos Antonio Scapin
collection DOAJ
description The determination of silicon (Si), total uranium (U) and impurities in uranium-silicide (U3Si2) samples by wavelength dispersion X-ray fluorescence technique (WDXRF) has been already validated and is currently implemented at IPEN’s X-Ray Fluorescence Laboratory (IPEN-CNEN/SP) in São Paulo, Brazil. Sample preparation requires the use of approximately 3 g of H3BO3 as sample holder and 1.8 g of U3Si2. However, because boron is a neutron absorber, this procedure precludes U3Si2 sample’s recovery, which, in time, considering routinely analysis, may account for significant unusable uranium waste. An estimated average of 15 samples per month is expected to be analyzed by WDXRF, resulting in approx. 320 g of U3Si2 that wouldn’t return to the nuclear fuel cycle. This not only impacts in production losses, but generates another problem: radioactive waste management. The purpose of this paper is to present the mathematical models that may be applied for the correction of systematic errors when H3BO3 sample holder is substituted by cellulose-acetate {[C6H7O2(OH)3-m(OOCCH3)m], m = 0~3}, thus enabling U3Si2 sample’s recovery. The results demonstrate that the adopted mathematical model is statistically satisfactory, allowing the optimization of the procedure.U3Si2, XRF, WDXRF.
format Article
id doaj-art-97f15ccbf027403fae635d9966088eee
institution Kabale University
issn 2319-0612
language English
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Brazilian Radiation Protection Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, SBPR)
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
spelling doaj-art-97f15ccbf027403fae635d9966088eee2025-08-20T03:51:04ZengBrazilian Radiation Protection Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Proteção Radiológica, SBPR)Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences2319-06122019-02-0172A (Suppl.)10.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.582443Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRFMarcos Antonio Scapin0Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e NuclearesThe determination of silicon (Si), total uranium (U) and impurities in uranium-silicide (U3Si2) samples by wavelength dispersion X-ray fluorescence technique (WDXRF) has been already validated and is currently implemented at IPEN’s X-Ray Fluorescence Laboratory (IPEN-CNEN/SP) in São Paulo, Brazil. Sample preparation requires the use of approximately 3 g of H3BO3 as sample holder and 1.8 g of U3Si2. However, because boron is a neutron absorber, this procedure precludes U3Si2 sample’s recovery, which, in time, considering routinely analysis, may account for significant unusable uranium waste. An estimated average of 15 samples per month is expected to be analyzed by WDXRF, resulting in approx. 320 g of U3Si2 that wouldn’t return to the nuclear fuel cycle. This not only impacts in production losses, but generates another problem: radioactive waste management. The purpose of this paper is to present the mathematical models that may be applied for the correction of systematic errors when H3BO3 sample holder is substituted by cellulose-acetate {[C6H7O2(OH)3-m(OOCCH3)m], m = 0~3}, thus enabling U3Si2 sample’s recovery. The results demonstrate that the adopted mathematical model is statistically satisfactory, allowing the optimization of the procedure.U3Si2, XRF, WDXRF.https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/582u3si2xrfwdxrf.
spellingShingle Marcos Antonio Scapin
Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRF
Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences
u3si2
xrf
wdxrf.
title Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRF
title_full Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRF
title_fullStr Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRF
title_full_unstemmed Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRF
title_short Application of bias correction methods to improve U3Si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by WDXRF
title_sort application of bias correction methods to improve u3si2 sample preparation for quantitative analysis by wdxrf
topic u3si2
xrf
wdxrf.
url https://bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/582
work_keys_str_mv AT marcosantonioscapin applicationofbiascorrectionmethodstoimproveu3si2samplepreparationforquantitativeanalysisbywdxrf