Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over Iran

Study region: Six climate zones in Iran: Zone 1 (humid Caspian region), Zone 2 (cold and semi-arid northwestern Iran), Zone 3 (mild and semi-humid western Iran), Zone 4 (mild and semi-arid northeastern Iran), Zone 5 (warm and semi-arid southwestern Iran), and Zone 6 (warm and arid eastern, southern,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Saeed Najafi, Omid Alizadeh, Tobias Sauter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825000588
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850034700708478976
author Mohammad Saeed Najafi
Omid Alizadeh
Tobias Sauter
author_facet Mohammad Saeed Najafi
Omid Alizadeh
Tobias Sauter
author_sort Mohammad Saeed Najafi
collection DOAJ
description Study region: Six climate zones in Iran: Zone 1 (humid Caspian region), Zone 2 (cold and semi-arid northwestern Iran), Zone 3 (mild and semi-humid western Iran), Zone 4 (mild and semi-arid northeastern Iran), Zone 5 (warm and semi-arid southwestern Iran), and Zone 6 (warm and arid eastern, southern, and southeastern Iran). Study focus: This study evaluates the performance of seven gridded precipitation datasets (CRU TS, TMPA 3B43, GPCC, IMERG, MERRA-2, ERA5, and PDIR) against rain gauge data. The accuracy of these datasets in representing precipitation patterns is assessed from 2000 to 2017, with a focus on their performance across diverse climate zones in Iran. New insights for the region: In Zone 1, ERA5 performs best in winter and autumn, while GPCC excels in spring and summer. In Zones 2 and 3, GPCC is the top performer in most seasons, while CRU TS performs best in autumn and winter for Zone 2. In Zone 4, GPCC outperforms all datasets year-round. In Zone 5, TMPA 3B43 performs best in winter, with GPCC slightly outperforming others in other seasons. Overall, ERA5 is most accurate in Zone 1, while GPCC performs best in other zones, with PDIR consistently underperforming across all zones. GPCC captures interannual precipitation variability well, making it the best overall performer. We recommend ERA5 for real-time monitoring in Zone 1, while GPCC is better suited for long-term studies in areas with dense rain gauge networks.
format Article
id doaj-art-97c5ee308f98412f8ec500d0798b3437
institution DOAJ
issn 2214-5818
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
spelling doaj-art-97c5ee308f98412f8ec500d0798b34372025-08-20T02:57:44ZengElsevierJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies2214-58182025-04-015810223410.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102234Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over IranMohammad Saeed Najafi0Omid Alizadeh1Tobias Sauter2Department of Water Resources Study and Research, Water Research Institute (WRI), Tehran, IranGeography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Corresponding author.Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyStudy region: Six climate zones in Iran: Zone 1 (humid Caspian region), Zone 2 (cold and semi-arid northwestern Iran), Zone 3 (mild and semi-humid western Iran), Zone 4 (mild and semi-arid northeastern Iran), Zone 5 (warm and semi-arid southwestern Iran), and Zone 6 (warm and arid eastern, southern, and southeastern Iran). Study focus: This study evaluates the performance of seven gridded precipitation datasets (CRU TS, TMPA 3B43, GPCC, IMERG, MERRA-2, ERA5, and PDIR) against rain gauge data. The accuracy of these datasets in representing precipitation patterns is assessed from 2000 to 2017, with a focus on their performance across diverse climate zones in Iran. New insights for the region: In Zone 1, ERA5 performs best in winter and autumn, while GPCC excels in spring and summer. In Zones 2 and 3, GPCC is the top performer in most seasons, while CRU TS performs best in autumn and winter for Zone 2. In Zone 4, GPCC outperforms all datasets year-round. In Zone 5, TMPA 3B43 performs best in winter, with GPCC slightly outperforming others in other seasons. Overall, ERA5 is most accurate in Zone 1, while GPCC performs best in other zones, with PDIR consistently underperforming across all zones. GPCC captures interannual precipitation variability well, making it the best overall performer. We recommend ERA5 for real-time monitoring in Zone 1, while GPCC is better suited for long-term studies in areas with dense rain gauge networks.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825000588Gridded precipitation datasetsRain gauge datasetClimate zonesIranDataset evaluation
spellingShingle Mohammad Saeed Najafi
Omid Alizadeh
Tobias Sauter
Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over Iran
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Gridded precipitation datasets
Rain gauge dataset
Climate zones
Iran
Dataset evaluation
title Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over Iran
title_full Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over Iran
title_fullStr Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over Iran
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over Iran
title_short Evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over Iran
title_sort evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets over iran
topic Gridded precipitation datasets
Rain gauge dataset
Climate zones
Iran
Dataset evaluation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825000588
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadsaeednajafi evaluationofgriddedprecipitationdatasetsoveriran
AT omidalizadeh evaluationofgriddedprecipitationdatasetsoveriran
AT tobiassauter evaluationofgriddedprecipitationdatasetsoveriran