Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo study
AIM. The objective of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of sticky bone alone, sticky bone with a PRF membrane, as well as sticky bone having a GTR membrane in healing apicomarginal defects.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-seven patients with apicomarginal defects were randomly d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
LLC "Endo Press"
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Эндодонтия Today |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1401 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850045781614002176 |
|---|---|
| author | D. Das P. Mondal K. K. Saha S. Das D. Karmakar A. Bhagawati |
| author_facet | D. Das P. Mondal K. K. Saha S. Das D. Karmakar A. Bhagawati |
| author_sort | D. Das |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | AIM. The objective of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of sticky bone alone, sticky bone with a PRF membrane, as well as sticky bone having a GTR membrane in healing apicomarginal defects.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-seven patients with apicomarginal defects were randomly divided into three groups: Group I (sticky bone alone), Group II (sticky bone with GTR membrane), and Group III (sticky bone with PRF membrane). Clinical and radiographic assessments, including probing depth, bone density, and lesion size, were conducted. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and ANOVA with a remarkable level of p < 0.05.RESULTS. Notable improvements in all parameters were observed across groups (p < 0.05). Group III showed the most notable reductions in probing depth and lesion size and the highest increase in bone density. Group II exhibited moderate improvements, while Group I had the least favorable outcomes.CONCLUSION. Combining sticky bone with PRF or GTR enhances bone healing in apicomarginal defects, with PRF yielding the best results. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-97c07ddbc4674ea9b7e1c58dc8ea6df3 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1683-2981 1726-7242 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | LLC "Endo Press" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Эндодонтия Today |
| spelling | doaj-art-97c07ddbc4674ea9b7e1c58dc8ea6df32025-08-20T02:54:37ZrusLLC "Endo Press"Эндодонтия Today1683-29811726-72422024-12-0122433534310.36377/ET-00551110Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo studyD. Das0P. Mondal1K. K. Saha2S. Das3D. Karmakar4A. Bhagawati5Dr. R. Ahmed Dental College and HospitalDr. R. Ahmed Dental College and HospitalNorth Bengal Dental College and HospitalRamakrishna Sarada Mission Matri Bhavan HospitalNorth Bengal Dental College and HospitalGovernment Dental CollegeAIM. The objective of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of sticky bone alone, sticky bone with a PRF membrane, as well as sticky bone having a GTR membrane in healing apicomarginal defects.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-seven patients with apicomarginal defects were randomly divided into three groups: Group I (sticky bone alone), Group II (sticky bone with GTR membrane), and Group III (sticky bone with PRF membrane). Clinical and radiographic assessments, including probing depth, bone density, and lesion size, were conducted. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and ANOVA with a remarkable level of p < 0.05.RESULTS. Notable improvements in all parameters were observed across groups (p < 0.05). Group III showed the most notable reductions in probing depth and lesion size and the highest increase in bone density. Group II exhibited moderate improvements, while Group I had the least favorable outcomes.CONCLUSION. Combining sticky bone with PRF or GTR enhances bone healing in apicomarginal defects, with PRF yielding the best results.https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1401apicomarginal defectbone regenerationguided tissue regenerationplatelet-rich fibrinsticky bonewound healing |
| spellingShingle | D. Das P. Mondal K. K. Saha S. Das D. Karmakar A. Bhagawati Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo study Эндодонтия Today apicomarginal defect bone regeneration guided tissue regeneration platelet-rich fibrin sticky bone wound healing |
| title | Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo study |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo study |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet-rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology: An in-vivo study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of sticky bone with guided tissue regeneration and platelet rich fibrin membranes in healing of apicomarginal defects with periapical pathology an in vivo study |
| topic | apicomarginal defect bone regeneration guided tissue regeneration platelet-rich fibrin sticky bone wound healing |
| url | https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1401 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ddas comparativeevaluationofstickybonewithguidedtissueregenerationandplateletrichfibrinmembranesinhealingofapicomarginaldefectswithperiapicalpathologyaninvivostudy AT pmondal comparativeevaluationofstickybonewithguidedtissueregenerationandplateletrichfibrinmembranesinhealingofapicomarginaldefectswithperiapicalpathologyaninvivostudy AT kksaha comparativeevaluationofstickybonewithguidedtissueregenerationandplateletrichfibrinmembranesinhealingofapicomarginaldefectswithperiapicalpathologyaninvivostudy AT sdas comparativeevaluationofstickybonewithguidedtissueregenerationandplateletrichfibrinmembranesinhealingofapicomarginaldefectswithperiapicalpathologyaninvivostudy AT dkarmakar comparativeevaluationofstickybonewithguidedtissueregenerationandplateletrichfibrinmembranesinhealingofapicomarginaldefectswithperiapicalpathologyaninvivostudy AT abhagawati comparativeevaluationofstickybonewithguidedtissueregenerationandplateletrichfibrinmembranesinhealingofapicomarginaldefectswithperiapicalpathologyaninvivostudy |