On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)

The article reconstructs the researchers’ “subjective reality” in Teodor Shanin’s peasant studies projects. While there has been extensive research on methodological, epistemological and empirical dimensions of these projects, little attention has been paid to personal experiences, emotions and tran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ilya Presnyakov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA 2025-01-01
Series:Крестьяноведение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peasantstudies.ru/en/category/35-2025-10-1?download=471
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850108187477278720
author Ilya Presnyakov
author_facet Ilya Presnyakov
author_sort Ilya Presnyakov
collection DOAJ
description The article reconstructs the researchers’ “subjective reality” in Teodor Shanin’s peasant studies projects. While there has been extensive research on methodological, epistemological and empirical dimensions of these projects, little attention has been paid to personal experiences, emotions and transformations of the researchers. This study aims at filling this gap by reconstructing their subjective perceptions through oral histories, memories and published sources and also at ‘localizing’ such a subjective reality by examining its connection with the Peredelkino House of Creativity, where Shanin’s research team used to meet periodically. The article consists of the following parts: first, it outlines the broader conditions of Shanin’s peasant studies expeditions; then it focuses on “subjective reality of the first encounters” with Shanin and his ideas; the fieldwork is examined through the researchers’ observation of rural communities, their efforts to gain peasants’ trust and methodological challenges they faced; further, the study considers the long table discussions at Peredelkino, emphasizing their dual function as spaces for methodological and personal support; finally, the author explains institutionalization of the projects’ subjective reality through their lasting impact on research and educational initiatives of its participants. The findings show that the scholars’ subjective reality was deeply intertwined with the broader intellectual and social-political transformations of the 1990s, which resulted in the specific research culture of Shanin’s peasant studies projects — a combination of reflections on ethnographic experiences, analytical and methodological frameworks with personal experiences, friendship, and intellectual partnership.
format Article
id doaj-art-97a6ae373f4e4a928c75685eb8b70cca
institution OA Journals
issn 2500-1809
2949-2564
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA
record_format Article
series Крестьяноведение
spelling doaj-art-97a6ae373f4e4a928c75685eb8b70cca2025-08-20T02:38:26ZengRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPAКрестьяноведение2500-18092949-25642025-01-011011642On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)Ilya Presnyakov0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-637XZvi Yavetz School of Historical Studies, Tel Aviv UniversityThe article reconstructs the researchers’ “subjective reality” in Teodor Shanin’s peasant studies projects. While there has been extensive research on methodological, epistemological and empirical dimensions of these projects, little attention has been paid to personal experiences, emotions and transformations of the researchers. This study aims at filling this gap by reconstructing their subjective perceptions through oral histories, memories and published sources and also at ‘localizing’ such a subjective reality by examining its connection with the Peredelkino House of Creativity, where Shanin’s research team used to meet periodically. The article consists of the following parts: first, it outlines the broader conditions of Shanin’s peasant studies expeditions; then it focuses on “subjective reality of the first encounters” with Shanin and his ideas; the fieldwork is examined through the researchers’ observation of rural communities, their efforts to gain peasants’ trust and methodological challenges they faced; further, the study considers the long table discussions at Peredelkino, emphasizing their dual function as spaces for methodological and personal support; finally, the author explains institutionalization of the projects’ subjective reality through their lasting impact on research and educational initiatives of its participants. The findings show that the scholars’ subjective reality was deeply intertwined with the broader intellectual and social-political transformations of the 1990s, which resulted in the specific research culture of Shanin’s peasant studies projects — a combination of reflections on ethnographic experiences, analytical and methodological frameworks with personal experiences, friendship, and intellectual partnership.https://peasantstudies.ru/en/category/35-2025-10-1?download=471teodor shaninpeasant studiessubjective realityoral historylong table methodperedelkinomoscow school of social and economic sciences
spellingShingle Ilya Presnyakov
On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)
Крестьяноведение
teodor shanin
peasant studies
subjective reality
oral history
long table method
peredelkino
moscow school of social and economic sciences
title On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)
title_full On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)
title_fullStr On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)
title_full_unstemmed On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)
title_short On the “subjective reality” of Teodor Shanin’s peasant projects: Field studies, ‘long table’ method, and Peredelkino (an oral history approach)
title_sort on the subjective reality of teodor shanin s peasant projects field studies long table method and peredelkino an oral history approach
topic teodor shanin
peasant studies
subjective reality
oral history
long table method
peredelkino
moscow school of social and economic sciences
url https://peasantstudies.ru/en/category/35-2025-10-1?download=471
work_keys_str_mv AT ilyapresnyakov onthesubjectiverealityofteodorshaninspeasantprojectsfieldstudieslongtablemethodandperedelkinoanoralhistoryapproach