The Esophagogastric Anastomosis

Background:. The incidence of anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery is highest after esophagogastric anastomosis, with leakage rates of 10% to 38% still being reported, but little consensus as to cause or corrective. The role of anastomotic tension from a series of physiological forces act...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas N. Walsh, FRCSI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-03-01
Series:Annals of Surgery Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000231
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849419282844221440
author Thomas N. Walsh, FRCSI
author_facet Thomas N. Walsh, FRCSI
author_sort Thomas N. Walsh, FRCSI
collection DOAJ
description Background:. The incidence of anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery is highest after esophagogastric anastomosis, with leakage rates of 10% to 38% still being reported, but little consensus as to cause or corrective. The role of anastomotic tension from a series of physiological forces acting on the anastomosis from the moment of recovery from anesthesia may be underestimated. It was hypothesized that anchoring the conduit in the mediastinum would provide the greatest protection during the vulnerable healing phase. Patients and Methods:. A prospectively maintained database was interrogated for anastomotic leakage following the introduction of an anastomotic technique employing anchoring sutures where the gastric conduit was secured to the mediastinal pleura with 3 obliquely inserted load-bearing sutures. A contrast study was performed between days 5 and 7 and all intrahospital mortalities underwent autopsy. Clinical, radiological, and autopsy leaks were recorded. Results:. Of 146 intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomoses in 144 patients, 81 (55%) of which were stapled, there was 1 clinical leak and 1 patient with an aortoenteric fistula, considered at autopsy to be possibly due to an anastomotic leak, to give an anastomotic leak rate of 2 in 146 (1.37%). Conclusion:. The low anastomotic leak rate in this series is potentially due to the protective effect of anchoring sutures, the chief difference from an otherwise standard anastomotic technique. These sutures protect the anastomosis from a series of distracting forces during the most vulnerable phase of healing. It is intuitive that the absence of tension would also reduce any risk posed by a minor impairment of blood supply or any imperfection of the technique.
format Article
id doaj-art-9745f4e46ba64eda9af605e05acd55bd
institution Kabale University
issn 2691-3593
language English
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format Article
series Annals of Surgery Open
spelling doaj-art-9745f4e46ba64eda9af605e05acd55bd2025-08-20T03:32:11ZengWolters Kluwer HealthAnnals of Surgery Open2691-35932023-03-0141e23110.1097/AS9.0000000000000231202303000-00019The Esophagogastric AnastomosisThomas N. Walsh, FRCSI0From the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.Background:. The incidence of anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery is highest after esophagogastric anastomosis, with leakage rates of 10% to 38% still being reported, but little consensus as to cause or corrective. The role of anastomotic tension from a series of physiological forces acting on the anastomosis from the moment of recovery from anesthesia may be underestimated. It was hypothesized that anchoring the conduit in the mediastinum would provide the greatest protection during the vulnerable healing phase. Patients and Methods:. A prospectively maintained database was interrogated for anastomotic leakage following the introduction of an anastomotic technique employing anchoring sutures where the gastric conduit was secured to the mediastinal pleura with 3 obliquely inserted load-bearing sutures. A contrast study was performed between days 5 and 7 and all intrahospital mortalities underwent autopsy. Clinical, radiological, and autopsy leaks were recorded. Results:. Of 146 intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomoses in 144 patients, 81 (55%) of which were stapled, there was 1 clinical leak and 1 patient with an aortoenteric fistula, considered at autopsy to be possibly due to an anastomotic leak, to give an anastomotic leak rate of 2 in 146 (1.37%). Conclusion:. The low anastomotic leak rate in this series is potentially due to the protective effect of anchoring sutures, the chief difference from an otherwise standard anastomotic technique. These sutures protect the anastomosis from a series of distracting forces during the most vulnerable phase of healing. It is intuitive that the absence of tension would also reduce any risk posed by a minor impairment of blood supply or any imperfection of the technique.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000231
spellingShingle Thomas N. Walsh, FRCSI
The Esophagogastric Anastomosis
Annals of Surgery Open
title The Esophagogastric Anastomosis
title_full The Esophagogastric Anastomosis
title_fullStr The Esophagogastric Anastomosis
title_full_unstemmed The Esophagogastric Anastomosis
title_short The Esophagogastric Anastomosis
title_sort esophagogastric anastomosis
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000231
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasnwalshfrcsi theesophagogastricanastomosis
AT thomasnwalshfrcsi esophagogastricanastomosis