Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model

Goaf has become one of the most significant sources of hazard affecting the safety of metal and nonmetal mines. Evaluation of goaf stability is of paramount importance for mine safety production. First, 13 indices such as rock mass structure, geological structure, and goaf volume are selected based...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linning Guo, Kepeng Hou, Huafen Sun, Yong Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/3884586
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849403826696617984
author Linning Guo
Kepeng Hou
Huafen Sun
Yong Yang
author_facet Linning Guo
Kepeng Hou
Huafen Sun
Yong Yang
author_sort Linning Guo
collection DOAJ
description Goaf has become one of the most significant sources of hazard affecting the safety of metal and nonmetal mines. Evaluation of goaf stability is of paramount importance for mine safety production. First, 13 indices such as rock mass structure, geological structure, and goaf volume are selected based on engineering experience and literature review to assess the stability of goaf. These indices are classified according to the characteristics of each factor, and a stability evaluation system for underground mine goaf is constructed. Second, the analytic hierarchy process method based on group decision theory is utilized to calculate the subjective weight of each index. Additionally, the CRITIC method is used to calculate the objective weight of each index. Finally, game theory is used to combine the subjective and objective weights, thereby improving the accuracy of the index weight. The stability grade of the goaf is calculated using the normal cloud model. The FLAC3D numerical simulation is used to analyze the stability of the goaf and verify the accuracy of the model. The abovementioned model is utilized for assessing the stability of the goaf in the Duimenshan mine section. The results indicate that 90% of the goaf area is in a stable or relatively stable condition, while the remaining 10% is unstable. The evaluation outcomes were compared with FLAC3D numerical simulations, highlighting a scientific and reliable method with an accuracy rate of 90%.
format Article
id doaj-art-97013c72f67e4a77b5304ea3fe256085
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-97013c72f67e4a77b5304ea3fe2560852025-08-20T03:37:09ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942024-01-01202410.1155/2024/3884586Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud ModelLinning Guo0Kepeng Hou1Huafen Sun2Yong Yang3Department of Resource Development EngineeringDepartment of Resource Development EngineeringDepartment of Resource Development EngineeringDepartment of Resource Development EngineeringGoaf has become one of the most significant sources of hazard affecting the safety of metal and nonmetal mines. Evaluation of goaf stability is of paramount importance for mine safety production. First, 13 indices such as rock mass structure, geological structure, and goaf volume are selected based on engineering experience and literature review to assess the stability of goaf. These indices are classified according to the characteristics of each factor, and a stability evaluation system for underground mine goaf is constructed. Second, the analytic hierarchy process method based on group decision theory is utilized to calculate the subjective weight of each index. Additionally, the CRITIC method is used to calculate the objective weight of each index. Finally, game theory is used to combine the subjective and objective weights, thereby improving the accuracy of the index weight. The stability grade of the goaf is calculated using the normal cloud model. The FLAC3D numerical simulation is used to analyze the stability of the goaf and verify the accuracy of the model. The abovementioned model is utilized for assessing the stability of the goaf in the Duimenshan mine section. The results indicate that 90% of the goaf area is in a stable or relatively stable condition, while the remaining 10% is unstable. The evaluation outcomes were compared with FLAC3D numerical simulations, highlighting a scientific and reliable method with an accuracy rate of 90%.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/3884586
spellingShingle Linning Guo
Kepeng Hou
Huafen Sun
Yong Yang
Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model
title_full Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model
title_fullStr Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model
title_full_unstemmed Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model
title_short Stability Evaluation of the Goaf Based on Combination Weighting and Cloud Model
title_sort stability evaluation of the goaf based on combination weighting and cloud model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/3884586
work_keys_str_mv AT linningguo stabilityevaluationofthegoafbasedoncombinationweightingandcloudmodel
AT kepenghou stabilityevaluationofthegoafbasedoncombinationweightingandcloudmodel
AT huafensun stabilityevaluationofthegoafbasedoncombinationweightingandcloudmodel
AT yongyang stabilityevaluationofthegoafbasedoncombinationweightingandcloudmodel