Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess Station
Systems are designed to perform specific task by giving certain input which produces the required output in an orderly manner known as process. The input, output, and the state variables should be known that will help in interacting with the system. The relation between these variables can be brough...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Complexity |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/7741473 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849695093748924416 |
|---|---|
| author | A. Annie Steffy Beula Geno Peter Albert Alexander Stonier K. Ezhil Vignesh Vivekananda Ganji |
| author_facet | A. Annie Steffy Beula Geno Peter Albert Alexander Stonier K. Ezhil Vignesh Vivekananda Ganji |
| author_sort | A. Annie Steffy Beula |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Systems are designed to perform specific task by giving certain input which produces the required output in an orderly manner known as process. The input, output, and the state variables should be known that will help in interacting with the system. The relation between these variables can be brought out by building a model that resembles or expresses the original performance of the system. The parameters of the model are estimated using the least squares approximation, maximum likelihood, maximum log-likelihood, and Bayesian parameter estimation methods by utilizing the experimental data from the multiprocess station. The selected parameters are converted to nine different transfer function models that represent the given dynamic system. The models framed are analyzed by the criterion curve technique using seven criterion functions evaluating the fitness of the model. Order of the model is found from Hankel matrix representation methods such as singular value decomposition and determinant method. Response of the models is compared with the original response to choose the best fit model by calculating ISE standard. All the above methods are used to model the system without physical and theoretical laws which is known as system identification. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-96cde41d5c9f449faba10a17868cc0ea |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1099-0526 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Complexity |
| spelling | doaj-art-96cde41d5c9f449faba10a17868cc0ea2025-08-20T03:19:53ZengWileyComplexity1099-05262024-01-01202410.1155/2024/7741473Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess StationA. Annie Steffy Beula0Geno Peter1Albert Alexander Stonier2K. Ezhil Vignesh3Vivekananda Ganji4Electrical and Electronics EngineeringCRISDSchool of Electrical EngineeringElectrical and Electronics EngineeringDepartment of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSystems are designed to perform specific task by giving certain input which produces the required output in an orderly manner known as process. The input, output, and the state variables should be known that will help in interacting with the system. The relation between these variables can be brought out by building a model that resembles or expresses the original performance of the system. The parameters of the model are estimated using the least squares approximation, maximum likelihood, maximum log-likelihood, and Bayesian parameter estimation methods by utilizing the experimental data from the multiprocess station. The selected parameters are converted to nine different transfer function models that represent the given dynamic system. The models framed are analyzed by the criterion curve technique using seven criterion functions evaluating the fitness of the model. Order of the model is found from Hankel matrix representation methods such as singular value decomposition and determinant method. Response of the models is compared with the original response to choose the best fit model by calculating ISE standard. All the above methods are used to model the system without physical and theoretical laws which is known as system identification.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/7741473 |
| spellingShingle | A. Annie Steffy Beula Geno Peter Albert Alexander Stonier K. Ezhil Vignesh Vivekananda Ganji Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess Station Complexity |
| title | Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess Station |
| title_full | Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess Station |
| title_fullStr | Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess Station |
| title_full_unstemmed | Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess Station |
| title_short | Behaviour Analysis of Modeling and Model Evaluating Methods in System Identification for a Multiprocess Station |
| title_sort | behaviour analysis of modeling and model evaluating methods in system identification for a multiprocess station |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/7741473 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aanniesteffybeula behaviouranalysisofmodelingandmodelevaluatingmethodsinsystemidentificationforamultiprocessstation AT genopeter behaviouranalysisofmodelingandmodelevaluatingmethodsinsystemidentificationforamultiprocessstation AT albertalexanderstonier behaviouranalysisofmodelingandmodelevaluatingmethodsinsystemidentificationforamultiprocessstation AT kezhilvignesh behaviouranalysisofmodelingandmodelevaluatingmethodsinsystemidentificationforamultiprocessstation AT vivekanandaganji behaviouranalysisofmodelingandmodelevaluatingmethodsinsystemidentificationforamultiprocessstation |