A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites
ABSTRACT Reliable and efficient population estimates are a critical need for effective management of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa). We evaluated the use of 10‐day camera grids for rapid population assessment (RPA) of wild pigs at 3 study sites that varied in vegetation communities and wild pig den...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1075 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850255293956489216 |
|---|---|
| author | Peter E. Schlichting James C. Beasley Raoul K. Boughton Amy J. Davis Kim M. Pepin Michael P. Glow Nathan P. Snow Ryan S. Miller Kurt C. VerCauteren Jesse S. Lewis |
| author_facet | Peter E. Schlichting James C. Beasley Raoul K. Boughton Amy J. Davis Kim M. Pepin Michael P. Glow Nathan P. Snow Ryan S. Miller Kurt C. VerCauteren Jesse S. Lewis |
| author_sort | Peter E. Schlichting |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Reliable and efficient population estimates are a critical need for effective management of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa). We evaluated the use of 10‐day camera grids for rapid population assessment (RPA) of wild pigs at 3 study sites that varied in vegetation communities and wild pig densities. Study areas included Buck Island Ranch, Florida; Tejon Ranch, California; and the Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA, during 2016–2018. Rapid population assessments grids were composed of baited camera traps spaced approximately 500 or 750 m apart. Two RPA grids were deployed per study site and each grid was deployed twice (4–6 months apart) to assess changes in response to season or population control efforts. We assessed the ability of RPA grids to track population trends, how camera number influenced estimate precision, and how relative abundance indices related to density estimates. We detected changes in occupancy probability, detection probability, and N‐mixture estimates following removal operations and between seasons, but the ability of RPA grids to track population trends was dependent on the statistical method used and number of cameras traps. Increasing the number of cameras traps used in RPA grids increased precision, and these results can be used in determining survey design and estimate choice. We found that estimates of occupancy probability, detection probability, and N‐mixture estimates were positively correlated with spatially explicit capture–recapture density estimates. Thus, these less labor‐intensive estimates from RPA grids showed potential to index the relative abundance of wild pigs in some systems. Our evaluation of RPAs indicates that using study‐specific combinations of statistical method and number of cameras can provide a useful tool for monitoring wild pig presence, tracking population trends, and evaluating the effectiveness of management actions. © 2020 The Wildlife Society. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-96b110b2f1e04f9f9fbb24400e294496 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2328-5540 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| spelling | doaj-art-96b110b2f1e04f9f9fbb24400e2944962025-08-20T01:56:55ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402020-06-0144237238210.1002/wsb.1075A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study SitesPeter E. Schlichting0James C. Beasley1Raoul K. Boughton2Amy J. Davis3Kim M. Pepin4Michael P. Glow5Nathan P. Snow6Ryan S. Miller7Kurt C. VerCauteren8Jesse S. Lewis9College of Integrative Sciences and Arts Arizona State University Polytechnic Campus, 6073 S Backus Mall Mesa AZ 85212 USASavannah River Ecology Laboratory, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia P.O. Drawer E Aiken SC 29802 USAUniversity of Florida, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 3401 Experiment Station Ona FL 33865 USAUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center 4101 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins CO 80521‐2154 USAUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center 4101 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins CO 80521‐2154 USAUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center 4101 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins CO 80521‐2154 USAUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center 4101 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins CO 80521‐2154 USAUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health 2150B Center Avenue Fort Collins CO 80526 USAUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center 4101 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins CO 80521‐2154 USACollege of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University Polytechnic Campus, 6073 S Backus Mall Mesa AZ 85212 USAABSTRACT Reliable and efficient population estimates are a critical need for effective management of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa). We evaluated the use of 10‐day camera grids for rapid population assessment (RPA) of wild pigs at 3 study sites that varied in vegetation communities and wild pig densities. Study areas included Buck Island Ranch, Florida; Tejon Ranch, California; and the Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA, during 2016–2018. Rapid population assessments grids were composed of baited camera traps spaced approximately 500 or 750 m apart. Two RPA grids were deployed per study site and each grid was deployed twice (4–6 months apart) to assess changes in response to season or population control efforts. We assessed the ability of RPA grids to track population trends, how camera number influenced estimate precision, and how relative abundance indices related to density estimates. We detected changes in occupancy probability, detection probability, and N‐mixture estimates following removal operations and between seasons, but the ability of RPA grids to track population trends was dependent on the statistical method used and number of cameras traps. Increasing the number of cameras traps used in RPA grids increased precision, and these results can be used in determining survey design and estimate choice. We found that estimates of occupancy probability, detection probability, and N‐mixture estimates were positively correlated with spatially explicit capture–recapture density estimates. Thus, these less labor‐intensive estimates from RPA grids showed potential to index the relative abundance of wild pigs in some systems. Our evaluation of RPAs indicates that using study‐specific combinations of statistical method and number of cameras can provide a useful tool for monitoring wild pig presence, tracking population trends, and evaluating the effectiveness of management actions. © 2020 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1075baitingcamera‐trappingferal swinerapid population assessmentsRPA gridSus scrofa |
| spellingShingle | Peter E. Schlichting James C. Beasley Raoul K. Boughton Amy J. Davis Kim M. Pepin Michael P. Glow Nathan P. Snow Ryan S. Miller Kurt C. VerCauteren Jesse S. Lewis A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites Wildlife Society Bulletin baiting camera‐trapping feral swine rapid population assessments RPA grid Sus scrofa |
| title | A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites |
| title_full | A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites |
| title_fullStr | A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites |
| title_short | A Rapid Population Assessment Method for Wild Pigs Using Baited Cameras at 3 Study Sites |
| title_sort | rapid population assessment method for wild pigs using baited cameras at 3 study sites |
| topic | baiting camera‐trapping feral swine rapid population assessments RPA grid Sus scrofa |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1075 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT petereschlichting arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT jamescbeasley arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT raoulkboughton arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT amyjdavis arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT kimmpepin arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT michaelpglow arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT nathanpsnow arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT ryansmiller arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT kurtcvercauteren arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT jesseslewis arapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT petereschlichting rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT jamescbeasley rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT raoulkboughton rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT amyjdavis rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT kimmpepin rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT michaelpglow rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT nathanpsnow rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT ryansmiller rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT kurtcvercauteren rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites AT jesseslewis rapidpopulationassessmentmethodforwildpigsusingbaitedcamerasat3studysites |