The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season

ABSTRACT Fecal contamination of surface waters presents significant human health and environmental risks. While many methods for understanding fecal contamination cannot differentiate between human and animal sources, microbial source tracking (MST) marker methods are used to identify fecal sources....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claire M. Murphy, Daniel L. Weller, Tanzy M. T. Love, Michelle D. Danyluk, Laura K. Strawn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2025-02-01
Series:Microbiology Spectrum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.01972-24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540841648848896
author Claire M. Murphy
Daniel L. Weller
Tanzy M. T. Love
Michelle D. Danyluk
Laura K. Strawn
author_facet Claire M. Murphy
Daniel L. Weller
Tanzy M. T. Love
Michelle D. Danyluk
Laura K. Strawn
author_sort Claire M. Murphy
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Fecal contamination of surface waters presents significant human health and environmental risks. While many methods for understanding fecal contamination cannot differentiate between human and animal sources, microbial source tracking (MST) marker methods are used to identify fecal sources. To understand how to best employ MST marker data for managing fecal contamination risks, the present study compiled previously collected MST marker data (N = 12,878 samples) from across North America; each sample in the data set had been tested for fecal contamination from one or more of five sources (avian, canine, human, ruminant, swine). Using these data, this study aimed to characterize associations between non-methodological and methodological factors and detection of host-specific MST markers and determine how methodological differences may complicate the interpretation of these associations between studies. Variance partitioning analysis was used to quantify the variance in host-specific MST marker detection attributable to non-methodological and methodological factors. Conditional forest and regression analysis were utilized to assess the association between detection and select non-methodological and methodological factors. Between 10% (canine) and 38% (human) of total variance was uniquely attributable to non-methodological factors for any of the fecal sources considered, while between 50% (human) and 84% (canine) of variance could not be attributed to either methodological or non-methodological factors. This highlights the need for standardization of methods for MST marker detection across studies but also suggests that other factors, beyond those non-methodological variables considered here, influenced variation in the likelihood of MST marker detection.IMPORTANCEThis study underscores complications associated with comparing findings from studies that used different methodologies to detect the same fecal targets and highlights the difficulties associated with using non-comparable data to generalize findings and develop science-based risk management plans. These findings highlight the need for standardization of sampling and laboratory methods across microbial source tracking marker studies. Our findings build on previous research to suggest that one-size-fits-all approaches to managing fecal hazards in surface waterways may not be appropriate; instead, strategies tailored to specific water sources and conditions at the time of water use may be more effective.
format Article
id doaj-art-9695f331d98e42c6ab7d0014bbef012e
institution Kabale University
issn 2165-0497
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format Article
series Microbiology Spectrum
spelling doaj-art-9695f331d98e42c6ab7d0014bbef012e2025-02-04T14:03:41ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyMicrobiology Spectrum2165-04972025-02-0113210.1128/spectrum.01972-24The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and seasonClaire M. Murphy0Daniel L. Weller1Tanzy M. T. Love2Michelle D. Danyluk3Laura K. Strawn4School of Food Science, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, Washington, USADepartment of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USADepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USADepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, Florida, USADepartment of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USAABSTRACT Fecal contamination of surface waters presents significant human health and environmental risks. While many methods for understanding fecal contamination cannot differentiate between human and animal sources, microbial source tracking (MST) marker methods are used to identify fecal sources. To understand how to best employ MST marker data for managing fecal contamination risks, the present study compiled previously collected MST marker data (N = 12,878 samples) from across North America; each sample in the data set had been tested for fecal contamination from one or more of five sources (avian, canine, human, ruminant, swine). Using these data, this study aimed to characterize associations between non-methodological and methodological factors and detection of host-specific MST markers and determine how methodological differences may complicate the interpretation of these associations between studies. Variance partitioning analysis was used to quantify the variance in host-specific MST marker detection attributable to non-methodological and methodological factors. Conditional forest and regression analysis were utilized to assess the association between detection and select non-methodological and methodological factors. Between 10% (canine) and 38% (human) of total variance was uniquely attributable to non-methodological factors for any of the fecal sources considered, while between 50% (human) and 84% (canine) of variance could not be attributed to either methodological or non-methodological factors. This highlights the need for standardization of methods for MST marker detection across studies but also suggests that other factors, beyond those non-methodological variables considered here, influenced variation in the likelihood of MST marker detection.IMPORTANCEThis study underscores complications associated with comparing findings from studies that used different methodologies to detect the same fecal targets and highlights the difficulties associated with using non-comparable data to generalize findings and develop science-based risk management plans. These findings highlight the need for standardization of sampling and laboratory methods across microbial source tracking marker studies. Our findings build on previous research to suggest that one-size-fits-all approaches to managing fecal hazards in surface waterways may not be appropriate; instead, strategies tailored to specific water sources and conditions at the time of water use may be more effective.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.01972-24microbial source trackingfecal contaminationsurface watermethods
spellingShingle Claire M. Murphy
Daniel L. Weller
Tanzy M. T. Love
Michelle D. Danyluk
Laura K. Strawn
The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season
Microbiology Spectrum
microbial source tracking
fecal contamination
surface water
methods
title The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season
title_full The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season
title_fullStr The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season
title_full_unstemmed The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season
title_short The probability of detecting host-specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season
title_sort probability of detecting host specific microbial source tracking markers in surface waters was strongly associated with method and season
topic microbial source tracking
fecal contamination
surface water
methods
url https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.01972-24
work_keys_str_mv AT clairemmurphy theprobabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT daniellweller theprobabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT tanzymtlove theprobabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT michelleddanyluk theprobabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT laurakstrawn theprobabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT clairemmurphy probabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT daniellweller probabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT tanzymtlove probabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT michelleddanyluk probabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason
AT laurakstrawn probabilityofdetectinghostspecificmicrobialsourcetrackingmarkersinsurfacewaterswasstronglyassociatedwithmethodandseason